Is it OK to tag linear pedestrian highways (highway=footway on way) as
highway=footway+area=yes areas?
Is it OK to tag linear pedestrian highways (highway=footway on way) as
highway=footway+area=yes areas and delete linear segments?
Is it OK to tag linear highways used by pedestrian and cyclists
areas for directional highways can be mapped _additionally_ as area:highway=*
but you should not delete the linear graph.
highway=* together with area=yes is for highway areas that are not directional
(I.e. they're omnidirectional).
footway and area=yes does not make sense to me, as this
2014-08-20 23:54 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
footway and area=yes does not make sense to me, as this would usually be
pedestrian, no?
In this case it makes sense as somebody want to map as area something that
clearly is a linear footway.
Il giorno 21/ago/2014, alle ore 00:00, Mateusz Konieczny
matkoni...@gmail.com ha scritto:
In this case it makes sense as somebody want to map as area something that
clearly is a linear footway.
as I've pointed out, s/he should use area:highway for this and keep the
linear
