Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-08 Thread yo paseopor
Ok, It is not the easiest way of the World...but it is not the most complicated. First we think to start of the best aproximation: the REAL aproximation so: -If the marks are only marks and not physically separation...don't separate in different ways...because is not REAL. -If the way is double

Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-07 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > On 06-Apr-17 04:09 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: >> >>> Do we have a scheme for tagging such a beast? >>> >> > You can combine turn:lanes [1] with change:lanes [2], the first describe > which lane you have to use for which

Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-06 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-04-06 0:29 GMT+02:00 Tom Pfeifer : > Do _not_. Separate ways are used when the roads are physically separated, > not when a white line is painted. Lane mapping would get you reverted. > +1 if you map lanes as carriageways, as lot of stuff breaks, e.g. routing for

Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-06 Thread Colin Smale
On 2017-04-06 14:33, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > On 05.04.2017 23:42, Kevin Kenny wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >> Where the solid lines start have a separate way for each lane >> >> this way routing engines

Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-06 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 05.04.2017 23:42, Kevin Kenny wrote: On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: Where the solid lines start have a separate way for each lane this way routing engines will regard them as separate roads and stop trying to get

Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-05 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 05.04.2017 23:19, Warin wrote: Where the solid lines start have a separate way for each lane Do _not_. Separate ways are used when the roads are physically separated, not when a white line is painted. Lane mapping would get you reverted. this way routing engines will regard them as

Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-05 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Where the solid lines start have a separate way for each lane > > this way routing engines will regard them as separate roads and stop > trying to get you from one lane to another. > But then, won't routing engines announce

Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-05 Thread Warin
Where the solid lines start have a separate way for each lane this way routing engines will regard them as separate roads and stop trying to get you from one lane to another. Then do your turn restrictions. On 06-Apr-17 04:09 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: Near where I live, there are several places

[Tagging] Tagging 'advance' turn restrictions

2017-04-05 Thread Kevin Kenny
Near where I live, there are several places where lane restrictions continue for several city blocks. These 'advance' turn restrictions are confusing to human drivers, and so far it seems that navigation systems can't cope with them at all. I'm wondering if it's even possible under our current