> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:42:36 +0100 > > Send Tagging mailing list submissions to > tagging@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > tagging-ow...@openstreetmap.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Tagging digest..." >
> 8. Re: Clarify tag access doc (Martin Koppenh?fer) > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:42:23 +0200 > From: Martin Koppenh?fer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Cc: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Clarify tag access doc > Message-ID: <d02b5280-a56b-4d00-8610-280f11b8e...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > Am 11/set/2012 um 14:17 schrieb Pieren <pier...@gmail.com>: > > > > I'm currently trying to refresh a wiki translation of the Access key page: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access > > > > I think too that a signle value is enough as already mentionned there. > > If we keep "customer", we need another one for "employee" (vs > > "custormer" parkings/entrances). Or I may suggest a subtag like > > "access=destination" + "destination=customer/employee". > > > Employee would be private IMHO, not destination > > > > > > > - "designated" vs "official". If I understand the wiki, the first is > > "not compulsory and often marked by a traffic signal" where the second > > is "complusory and always marked by a traffic signal". Is that correct > > ? > > > IIRR those were initially intended to mean the same. > > > > So, for instance, as a router for > > cars, how should I handle a road tagged with "access=official" (or > > "designated") + "bicycle=yes" ? > > > Strange tagging. Access=designated does not follow the convention <mode of > transport>=designated. You cannot infer access restrictions for cars from > this (I.e. fall back to the default, which depends on the highway class). > > > > > > - is "permissive" a legal status, as the introduction says that values > > are all about "legal access" ? > > > Yes, it is a legal status that says you don't have an official right of way. > > > Cheers, > Martin > Hi, I stumbled over this dispute, when I tagged a cycleway, designated as being special build, in my mind covering the allowed, with motorvehicles - permissive, allowed to go with a permit or a road with inhabitants only or HGV only ?What to use for a parkingaisle just for HGV ?Whats the difference between designated and allowed, when i started to tag I would like to fill it in ? > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > End of Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17 > ***************************************
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
