Hi, John, > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:20:04 +0100 > From: John Sturdy <jcg.stu...@gmail.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Uses of parts of buildings > Message-ID: > <cafjf9kpouboq2kypav1_iereu7zxcbx+hq-nhhgp1ff5y5e...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Martin Vonwald (imagic) > <imagic....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > A quick question how you would tag this: > > * one building (looks from the outside mostly like a residential building) > > * the building is used for three different things: an office, a riding > > ground (just assume it's a pitch) and a stable. > > * the building is not separated - it's just one building > > * I'm not interested in the detail- tagging, just how you would tag three > > different uses. > > > > My idea right now is: > > * building=yes for the whole building. Or should it be residential? > > * for each part draw a separate polygon and tag with building:use=whatever. > > > > What I'm missing here is the connection between the building and its parts. > > So I thought I could use the 3D-extensions for this, namely > > building:parts=yes on the main polygon and building:part=yes on the parts. > > You'd certainly need 3D for many such buildings, as flats / apartments > over shops are quite common; the different uses will be in the same 2D > location. > I do have IMHO a simple suggestion, whats up against adding layers (+1, +2) if the functions are located at different levels ? If not, youll have to separate them by multipolygones as Martin stated. Or even -1 if the parking facilities are below ground level ? Its happening more and more when new residential areas are build. Private parking below !Greets Hendrik > > End of Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 44 > ***************************************
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging