On 16/10/19 19:08, David Marchal wrote:
Mateusz,
The first thing is that this tagging scheme is mainly used in Poland,
so that sounded like a local, not widely approved, tagging scheme.
The second thing, which is the real problem to me, is that I don't see
how to link these with the forest,
sent from a phone
> On 16. Oct 2019, at 10:08, David Marchal wrote:
>
> The second thing, which is the real problem to me, is that I don't see how to
> link these with the forest, as a parcel number is valid only in a given
> forest. With a relation? What kind?
no need for a relation, the
16 Oct 2019, 10:08 by pene...@live.fr:
> Mateusz,
>
> The first thing is that this tagging scheme is mainly used in Poland, so that
> sounded like a local, not widely approved, tagging scheme.
>
Well, every tagging scheme starts from that.
> The second thing, which is the real problem to me, is
in a given forest.
With a relation? What kind?
Awaiting your answer,
Regards.
De : Mateusz Konieczny
Envoyé : mercredi 9 octobre 2019 21:29
À : Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Objet : Re: [Tagging] Tagging forest parcels
boundary=forest_compartment
There may be a misunderstanding here: what I mean about forest parcels is a
piece of forest which is numbered and whose number is displayed on site, with a
plate or a painted text. Such data can be useful for orientation in a forest
and, until some years ago, these numbers were displayed on
Am Mi., 9. Okt. 2019 um 22:05 Uhr schrieb Leif Rasmussen <354...@gmail.com>:
> I'd go with landuse=forestry on the property, a tag that was suggested
> here a while back. This isn't official or anything, but moving towards
> tagging forest parcels differently from the trees seems important.
>
Similar problems with other features.
Possibly use a site relation?
Map each individual parcel as a simple way with the reference.
Then place each parcel into a site relation and then the common tags on
the site relation.
Something like that, look up the site relation on the wiki for
I'd go with landuse=forestry on the property, a tag that was suggested here
a while back. This isn't official or anything, but moving towards tagging
forest parcels differently from the trees seems important.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 3:32 PM Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
>
>
>
> 9 Oct 2019, 18:11 by
9 Oct 2019, 18:11 by pene...@live.fr:
> Hello, there.
>
> My question is simple: how do we tag such things? The
> boundary=forest_compartment relation is not rendered, and what is rendered is
> tagging as landuse=forest both the forest and its parcels, which leads to
> rendering it twice,
Hello, there.
My question is simple: how do we tag such things? The
boundary=forest_compartment relation is not rendered, and what is rendered is
tagging as landuse=forest both the forest and its parcels, which leads to
rendering it twice, as you can see here:
10 matches
Mail list logo
