Am 16.08.2014 17:50, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
>> Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 23:52, St Niklaas ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building
>
>
> actually a bridge isn't a building according to standard terminology, it is a
> structure. But si
On 16.08.2014 17:50, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 23:52, St Niklaas ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building
>
> actually a bridge isn't a building according to standard terminology, it is a
> structure. But since in o
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 05:50:06PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> > Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 23:52, St Niklaas ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building
>
>
> actually a bridge isn't a building according to standard terminology, it i
> Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 23:52, St Niklaas ha
> scritto:
>
> I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building
actually a bridge isn't a building according to standard terminology, it is a
structure. But since in osm it seems we are using building synonymously for all
k
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: [Tagging] bridges
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I d like to contribute to the bridge discusson
One
remark I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building, if you ad
it completely as a bridge to OSM. Th
