From my experience with road bikes, a certain amount of mud will get flung
upwards by the wheels at an angle, missing the mudflaps but not the rider.
The same would likely be true of horse droppings.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can
On Fri Sep 4 18:40:55 2015 GMT+0100, John Eldredge wrote:
> Not to mention the amount of horse dung you are willing to have your bike
> wheels fling up onto you.
Many bridleways see very little horse traffic so its not often a problem. Mud
however, lots of that.
Phil (trigpoint)
>
> --
> John
This is why you ride with full fenders with mudflaps and use a chaincase.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:40 PM, John Eldredge wrote:
> Not to mention the amount of horse dung you are willing to have your bike
> wheels fling up onto you.
>
> --
> John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
> "Darkness can
Not to mention the amount of horse dung you are willing to have your bike
wheels fling up onto you.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
On Septe
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:49:56AM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> highway=footway+bicycle=designated is incorrect tagging (and JOSM
> validator keeps number of wrong tagging relatively low).
>
> I unsure about highway=bridleway+bicycle=designated but given that it
> appears 2 129 times worldwi
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 6:59 PM, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
>
> On Tue Sep 1 10:49:56 2015 GMT+0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>>
>> I unsure about highway=bridleway+bicycle=designated but given that it
>> appears 2 129 times worldwide it is likely that is also may be
>> considered as mistake.
>>
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 07:02:38 -0500
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:24:48 +0100
> > "Dave F." wrote:
> >
> > > On 01/09/2015 10:59, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:08:34 +0100
> > > > "Dave F."
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:24:48 +0100
> "Dave F." wrote:
>
> > On 01/09/2015 10:59, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:08:34 +0100
> > > "Dave F." wrote:
> > >
> > >> Your suggestion of decreasing the road class is "trol
On 01/09/2015 12:52, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
- I am speaking about value of highway tag in OSM, not the official
classification (in many places these may be the same or strongly
related - but it is not a strict rule).
Road reference classification tags relate to official road
classific
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 06:42:02 -0500
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
> wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a better name - but for example [highway=footway;
> > proposed=yes] may not be incorrect. It is not changing that such
> > tagging should not be used as it m
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:24:48 +0100
"Dave F." wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 10:59, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:08:34 +0100
> > "Dave F." wrote:
> >
> >> Your suggestion of decreasing the road class is "trolltaging"
> >> Please don't do that. Lane closures or access restrictions e
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> I am looking for a better name - but for example [highway=footway;
> proposed=yes] may not be incorrect. It is not changing that such
> tagging should not be used as it makes OSM data less usable.
>
How about highway=proposed, proposed=f
On 01/09/2015 10:59, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:08:34 +0100
"Dave F." wrote:
Your suggestion of decreasing the road class is "trolltaging" Please
don't do that. Lane closures or access restrictions etc, does not
change a road's classification.
Long-term closure/access res
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:08:34 +0100
"Dave F." wrote:
> Your suggestion of decreasing the road class is "trolltaging" Please
> don't do that. Lane closures or access restrictions etc, does not
> change a road's classification.
Long-term closure/access restriction is a valid reason to change
class
On Tue Sep 1 10:49:56 2015 GMT+0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> I unsure about highway=bridleway+bicycle=designated but given that it
> appears 2 129 times worldwide it is likely that is also may be
> considered as mistake.
>
Makes sense to me, bicycles can legally use a bridleway in England/Wa
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:11:46 +0200
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 01:41 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > It is not OK to use one tag (for example amenity=hotel) and add
> > second tag that negates or massively change its meaning (for
> > example adding involuntary=yes to amenity=hotel inste
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:32:37 +1000
Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For example somebody wants to produce map of cycleways. Simply
> > processing highway=cycleway and highway=path with bicycle=designated
> > should be enough.
>
> highway-=path with bicycle=yes
This is merely allowed cycli
On 31/08/2015 9:41 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:29:45 +0100
"Dave F." wrote:
What's a 'trolltag'?
It is not OK to use one tag (for example amenity=hotel) and add second
tag that negates or massively change its meaning (for example adding
involuntary=yes to amenity=hotel
That's why I would prefer a generalized life cycle tagging scheme in the
form of a prefix. (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix)
For example "disused:highway=cycleway".
It would eliminate the need for data consumers to filter for more tags than
you need. If you just look for cyclewa
On 31/08/2015, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Good
> luck with filtering out proposed=yes, abandoned=yes, vacant=yes,
> demolished=yes, construction=yes, empty=yes, ruins=yes, parsing
> start_date and end_date etc etc.
Case in point: have a look at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/
Hi,
On 08/31/2015 01:41 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> It is not OK to use one tag (for example amenity=hotel) and add second
> tag that negates or massively change its meaning (for example adding
> involuntary=yes to amenity=hotel instead of using amenity=prison).
> Additional tags should clarify
Thank you for clarifying. I wanted to be sure of your meaning before
replying:
Your suggestion of decreasing the road class is "trolltaging" Please
don't do that. Lane closures or access restrictions etc, does not change
a road's classification.
Please refrain from inventing words such as 't
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 01:29:45 +0100
"Dave F." wrote:
> What's a 'trolltag'?
It is not OK to use one tag (for example amenity=hotel) and add second
tag that negates or massively change its meaning (for example adding
involuntary=yes to amenity=hotel instead of using amenity=prison).
Additional tag
23 matches
Mail list logo
