I appreciate the pointed questions offered here. See responses in-line:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:37 AM Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my opinion is that stuff that is not visible on the ground and not
> meaningfully editable by mappers needs a very strong reason to be mapped
> at all.
>
> 1.
Hi,
my opinion is that stuff that is not visible on the ground and not
meaningfully editable by mappers needs a very strong reason to be mapped
at all.
1. Are SEZ boundaries visible on the ground (signage, physical separation)?
2. If not, do SEZ boundaries usually coincide with existing
I would say that the Chinese mapping community should decide which of these
areas fit the definition of an SEZ, and tag those areas accordingly. The
Wikipedia article on SEZs (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_economic_zone) has both a definition
as well as a list of sub-categories of SEZs
How do you identify different types of soecial ecobomic zones? For exmaple,
in China, you have Hainan, which is a special economic zone for tourism,
you have Shenzhen, which is for policy innivation, you have Tianjin Binhai
new area, which is for logistics, you have a Cloud computing special
Folks:
Last week I opened an RFC for the proposed new tag
boundary=special_economic_zone. That announcement generated only minimal
discussion, resulting in a minor change to the proposal to address the
concern raised. I am sending this update to ensure that the community has
adequate
