Re: [Tagging] Waste_collection - a new Feature Proposal - RFC
Am 14.02.2015 um 02:41 schrieb Dave Swarthout: > I think amenity=waste_disposal with sub tags for the type of waste being > disposed of could be a workable solution. It's more complicated than using > another top level tag like dump_station, etc., for sewage but allows for > more specificity when desired. This seems to be a good, general purpose, > top level tag. +1 It will work far better than waste=* or rubbish=* on there own if you also think about the amenity=recycling and the possible overlaps. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Waste_collection - a new Feature Proposal - RFC
I think amenity=waste_disposal with sub tags for the type of waste being disposed of could be a workable solution. It's more complicated than using another top level tag like dump_station, etc., for sewage but allows for more specificity when desired. This seems to be a good, general purpose, top level tag. On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:33 AM, David Bannon wrote: > > OK folks, here it really is ! A small group have identified a need for > a new high level tag, waste_collection= > > Likely values to be identified in a latter and separate process. Not > unlike those used for waste=, a subtag of amenity=waste_disposal;waste=* > > The background is that while we started talking about improving tags > that apply to campsites, we quickly realised that waste (rubbish, trash, > garbage, human waste, animal waste) exists on its own, usually far too > much of it ! I consider the small amount of data in OSM referring to > waste a sure indication that this is an unaddressed need. > > Please comment on the proposed name : key:waste_disposal and its high > levelness. > > A discussion about possible values would be useful but we consider that > we should get the key up first and then talk about values. Please see > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal > and > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waste > > David > > > > > On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 12:00 +1100, Warin wrote: > > On 14/02/2015 11:43 AM, David Bannon wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:16 +1100, Warin wrote: > > > . > > > > I'd split the voting up into > > > . > > > > waste, collection is the more frequent case. > > > > waste_collection > > > Agreed, you said that in your previous note but it slipped my mind by > > > time I responded. Sigh ... > > > > > > When you say, "split the voting", are you suggesting that its > > > sufficiently 'ripe' to be asking for a formal (ie in the wiki) vote > > > yet ? Bearing in mind we have had only you, me and Dave S contribute to > > > the discussion ? > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > You asked for 'lets have some hands up' .. that implies a vote of > > sorts.. .. but I'd not move to a formal vote yet? > > > > I'd like some more peoples thoughts on the issue and words.. more > > comments. Support .. and criticism .. just an interest. > > > > There is a required minimum time for comments - two weeks .. with a > > name change to waste_collection perhaps two weeks from the change of > > name? I'd suggest a new proposal page with the new name .. provided > > there is some support for the name .. apart from you & me? And any > > better names put forward? > > ___ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Waste_collection - a new Feature Proposal - RFC
OK folks, here it really is ! A small group have identified a need for a new high level tag, waste_collection= Likely values to be identified in a latter and separate process. Not unlike those used for waste=, a subtag of amenity=waste_disposal;waste=* The background is that while we started talking about improving tags that apply to campsites, we quickly realised that waste (rubbish, trash, garbage, human waste, animal waste) exists on its own, usually far too much of it ! I consider the small amount of data in OSM referring to waste a sure indication that this is an unaddressed need. Please comment on the proposed name : key:waste_disposal and its high levelness. A discussion about possible values would be useful but we consider that we should get the key up first and then talk about values. Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waste David On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 12:00 +1100, Warin wrote: > On 14/02/2015 11:43 AM, David Bannon wrote: > > > On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:16 +1100, Warin wrote: > > . > > > I'd split the voting up into > > . > > > waste, collection is the more frequent case. > > > waste_collection > > Agreed, you said that in your previous note but it slipped my mind by > > time I responded. Sigh ... > > > > When you say, "split the voting", are you suggesting that its > > sufficiently 'ripe' to be asking for a formal (ie in the wiki) vote > > yet ? Bearing in mind we have had only you, me and Dave S contribute to > > the discussion ? > > > > David > > > > > > You asked for 'lets have some hands up' .. that implies a vote of > sorts.. .. but I'd not move to a formal vote yet? > > I'd like some more peoples thoughts on the issue and words.. more > comments. Support .. and criticism .. just an interest. > > There is a required minimum time for comments - two weeks .. with a > name change to waste_collection perhaps two weeks from the change of > name? I'd suggest a new proposal page with the new name .. provided > there is some support for the name .. apart from you & me? And any > better names put forward? > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
