On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Christoph Hormann
wrote:
> In other words: if you are aware of the problem you are unlikely to
> create a formal error while doing normal editing of the coastline even
> if you don't shy away from coastline edits.
>
I've actually learnt
On Tuesday 06 September 2016, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> I'll be following this discussion with interest, because I suspect
> that a good many mappers have the same approach that I do in
> estuarine areas: "don't mess with the coastline, you're too likely to
> break something."
Note this is acutally
I'll be following this discussion with interest, because I suspect that a
good many mappers have the same approach that I do in estuarine areas:
"don't mess with the coastline, you're too likely to break something."
My understanding is that the coastline is *supposed* to follow the
high-water
During a day kayaking I noticed that the OSM map in the area was less than
perfect so I thought I’d see what I could do to improve it. But I have not
worked on this type of feature very much and am a little uncertain of some
tagging details.
The area is a “back bay”, a tidal area with some