Re: [Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff

2017-10-08 Thread Richard
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 08:39:51PM +, marc marc wrote: > Hello, > > Le 03. 10. 17 à 21:46, Kevin Kenny a écrit : > > is there particular tagging that I should > > be using where ways cross because of natural topography? > > 'covered=yes'? Something else? > > you can/should put layer to parts

Re: [Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff

2017-10-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone On 3. Oct 2017, at 22:39, marc marc wrote: >> is there particular tagging that I should >> be using where ways cross because of natural topography? >> 'covered=yes'? Something else? > > you can/should put layer to parts of ways that don't cross +1, I’d do both, covered and

Re: [Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff

2017-10-03 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Bill Ricker wrote: > This obviously doesn't qualify as a tunnel since the ?north? side is open to > air; nor is it a cave, quite. Do we have a way attribute or area attribute > for undercut/overhang area ? "covered=yes", I think... >> And, yeah, 'natural=cliff'

Re: [Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff

2017-10-03 Thread Bill Ricker
> > Nominally layer=0 is 'ground level'. In these situations the 'ground > level' > > folds back on itself - so both 'layers' are nominally 0. > ​I think Kevin has adequately refuted that: ​ > OK, yeah, I forgot 'layer' - and I think I'd use the rule, if you look up > to > the zenith and see rock

Re: [Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff

2017-10-03 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04-Oct-17 07:39 AM, marc marc wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Le 03. 10. 17 à 21:46, Kevin Kenny a écrit : >>> >>> is there particular tagging that I should >>> be using where ways cross because of natural topography? >>> 'covered=

Re: [Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff

2017-10-03 Thread Warin
On 04-Oct-17 07:39 AM, marc marc wrote: Hello, Le 03. 10. 17 à 21:46, Kevin Kenny a écrit : is there particular tagging that I should be using where ways cross because of natural topography? 'covered=yes'? Something else? you can/should put layer to parts of ways that don't cross Nominally

Re: [Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff

2017-10-03 Thread marc marc
Hello, Le 03. 10. 17 à 21:46, Kevin Kenny a écrit : > is there particular tagging that I should > be using where ways cross because of natural topography? > 'covered=yes'? Something else? you can/should put layer to parts of ways that don't cross Regards, Marc ___

[Tagging] Way beneath overhanging cliff

2017-10-03 Thread Kevin Kenny
I'm just wondering how best to tag to clarify a situation that I've encountered twice now. If you look at the Indian Ladder and Escarpment trails on http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/42.6529/-74.0150 you'll see that there are several points where they nearly cross. Actually, at a couple of thos