2018-05-11 14:04 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 11. May 2018, at 14:35, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
> >
> > similar for the other two streets. With the proposed relation, I would
> create a relation with this tags
>
sent from a phone
> On 11. May 2018, at 14:35, Javier Sánchez Portero
> wrote:
>
> similar for the other two streets. With the proposed relation, I would create
> a relation with this tags
>
> type=address
> addr:housenumber=1-25
> addr:postcode=10018
>
2018-05-11 10:53 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> May be it would be good to have a relation to keep in only one place an
>> address and link there the affected elements: entrances, buildings, POI's
>> and area for this address. This would be necessary only for some cases
2018-05-11 10:40 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero :
> In Spain, there isn't a relation one-to-one between entrances and
> addresses, but it's pretty common to have a building with more than one
> address. They may be a building with access from different streets or a
>
2018-05-09 22:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> Is there a way to indicate a housenumber is a feature, vs. a property?
>
> In many places, housenumbers refer to buildings or sites, and you might
> omit addresses on contained features (because you can hope for
.
--
Andrew
From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>
Sent: 09 May 2018 22:41
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] address property vs. housenumber as a feature
Is there a way to indicate a housenumber is a feature, vs. a property?
I
Is there a way to indicate a housenumber is a feature, vs. a property?
In many places, housenumbers refer to buildings or sites, and you might omit
addresses on contained features (because you can hope for inheritance from the
containing address object). Unfortunately the situation in Italy is