Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-11-01 Thread Richard
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:44:50AM +0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged > type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign if similar stuff occurs frequently I would suggest

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
28 Oct 2019, 18:29 by pla16...@gmail.com: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 17:17, Kevin Kenny <> kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:54 AM Tom Pfeifer <>> t.pfei...@computer.org >> >> > wrote: >> > >>>

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Jorge Pinho
A segunda, 28 de out de 2019, 08:46, Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com> escreveu: > "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged > type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign > > For me it seems a horrible

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Simon Poole
Am 28.10.2019 um 11:11 schrieb marc marc: > Le 28.10.19 à 09:44, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : >> "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged >> type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign > Yes it's horrible > > the

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Paul Allen
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 17:17, Kevin Kenny wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:54 AM Tom Pfeifer > wrote: > > >>> type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" > > >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign > > I concur with all those who said this is a horrible idea. > So

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:54 AM Tom Pfeifer wrote: > >>> type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" > >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign I concur with all those who said this is a horrible idea. > I had a look at the original proposal, and it does not contain the

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Simon Poole
There are some other "weird" things, for example using "intersection" instead of "via" for the via role, which means that the handling needs to be special cased relative to turn restrictions and similar relations. Am 28.10.2019 um 15:51 schrieb Tom Pfeifer: type=destination_sign +

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread François Lacombe
Le lun. 28 oct. 2019 à 09:46, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > For me it seems a horrible and unacceptable tagging - amenity=hospital > should be on hospitals > and nothing else. > +1 Same kind of directions are given for marker=* key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:marker#How_to_map

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Tom Pfeifer
type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign I had a look at the original proposal, and it does not contain the word 'amenity'. Thus I conclude it had been later fiddled into the wiki page. Anyway looking into the voting results the

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Andrew Harvey
+1 I'd support updated the wiki page to favour tagging the symbol and not using amenity=hospital. On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 21:13, marc marc wrote: > Le 28.10.19 à 09:44, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > > "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged > > type=destination_sign +

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Andy Townsend
On 28/10/2019 10:11, marc marc wrote: Le 28.10.19 à 09:44, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign Yes it's horrible the next line said

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Dave F via Tagging
On 28/10/2019 09:42, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: On 10/28/19 03:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign For me it seems a horrible and

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread marc marc
Le 28.10.19 à 09:44, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged > type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign Yes it's horrible the next line said destination:symbol=hospital it's

Re: [Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On 10/28/19 03:44, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > "sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged > type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign > > For me it seems a horrible and unacceptable tagging - amenity=hospital >

[Tagging] amenity=hospital on things that are not hospitals - is it a good idea?

2019-10-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
"sign having a hospital icon and no name can simply be tagged type=destination_sign + amenity=hospital" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign For me it seems a horrible and unacceptable tagging - amenity=hospital should be on hospitals and nothing else. Is it just me,