Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
2015-01-14 17:02 GMT+01:00 fly : > Am 13.01.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Martin Vonwald: > > When writing the :lanes-proposal I used those tags in an example. But in > > my opinion bicycle:lanes=...|designated|... fits better. > > I was irritated by your example, as well. Maybe, you can rework some > examples and add them to the wiki. At least, marking the original ones > as outdated would be really appreciated. > Good point, although I wouldn't touch the original proposal. But we need some more examples, I think either at the end of the main article "Lanes" or at least linked from there. I hope I'll find the time in the next days or week, then I'll see to it. Best regards, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
Am 13.01.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Martin Vonwald: > When writing the :lanes-proposal I used those tags in an example. But in > my opinion bicycle:lanes=...|designated|... fits better. I was irritated by your example, as well. Maybe, you can rework some examples and add them to the wiki. At least, marking the original ones as outdated would be really appreciated. Thanks fly ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
Well then: +1 to all. No exceptions. Am 13. Januar 2015 14:01:16 MEZ, schrieb Martin Vonwald : >2015-01-13 13:52 GMT+01:00 Hubert : > >> +1 to all. Except "none" in this case was meant to be the default >value >> from the :lanes proposal. >> > >The "default value" is always an empty value, e.g. minspeed=|80|50. The >value "none" might be defined by the main key, e.g. maxspeed=none. If >the >main key does not specify the value "none", one should not use this >value >in any suffixed key. > > > > >___ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
2015-01-13 13:52 GMT+01:00 Hubert : > +1 to all. Except "none" in this case was meant to be the default value > from the :lanes proposal. > The "default value" is always an empty value, e.g. minspeed=|80|50. The value "none" might be defined by the main key, e.g. maxspeed=none. If the main key does not specify the value "none", one should not use this value in any suffixed key. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
+1 to all. Except "none" in this case was meant to be the default value from the :lanes proposal. Am 13. Januar 2015 13:45:24 MEZ, schrieb Martin Vonwald : >2015-01-13 13:38 GMT+01:00 Hubert : > >> I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes >> defines es the type. So one could have cycleway:lanes:forward=none | >lane >> and bicycle:lanes:forwad= yes | designated , for example. >> > >That's correct. AFAIK it is common understanding, that some kind of way >with access tags bicycle=designated and vehicle=no (or similar) is more >or >less identical to a cyclelane. > >My problems with cycleway:lanes=...|lane|none|... are: >* The value none is not specified for the key cycleway >* The tag cycleway=lane tells use, there is a cyclelane, but it doesn't >tell us where. > >Best regards, >Martin > > > > >___ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
2015-01-13 13:38 GMT+01:00 Hubert : > I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes > defines es the type. So one could have cycleway:lanes:forward=none | lane > and bicycle:lanes:forwad= yes | designated , for example. > That's correct. AFAIK it is common understanding, that some kind of way with access tags bicycle=designated and vehicle=no (or similar) is more or less identical to a cyclelane. My problems with cycleway:lanes=...|lane|none|... are: * The value none is not specified for the key cycleway * The tag cycleway=lane tells use, there is a cyclelane, but it doesn't tell us where. Best regards, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes defines es the type. So one could have cycleway:lanes:forward=none | lane and bicycle:lanes:forwad= yes | designated , for example. Am 13. Januar 2015 13:28:22 MEZ, schrieb Andrew Shadura : >Hi, > >Some places in the wiki mention cycleway:lanes:* tags, and those are >indeed used in a few places (31 uses currently). It seems to me these >tags are obsolete and have been replaced by bicycle:lanes:*, is that >correct? Should I probably mass-replace them? > >-- >Cheers, > Andrew > >___ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
When writing the :lanes-proposal I used those tags in an example. But in my opinion bicycle:lanes=...|designated|... fits better. "mass-replace" is a word that might cause some adverse reactions on this mailing list ;-) Have fun, Martin 2015-01-13 13:28 GMT+01:00 Andrew Shadura : > Hi, > > Some places in the wiki mention cycleway:lanes:* tags, and those are > indeed used in a few places (31 uses currently). It seems to me these > tags are obsolete and have been replaced by bicycle:lanes:*, is that > correct? Should I probably mass-replace them? > > -- > Cheers, > Andrew > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] bicycle:lanes=designated|... vs cycleway:lanes=lane|...
Hi, Some places in the wiki mention cycleway:lanes:* tags, and those are indeed used in a few places (31 uses currently). It seems to me these tags are obsolete and have been replaced by bicycle:lanes:*, is that correct? Should I probably mass-replace them? -- Cheers, Andrew ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
