2015-01-14 17:02 GMT+01:00 fly :
> Am 13.01.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
> > When writing the :lanes-proposal I used those tags in an example. But in
> > my opinion bicycle:lanes=...|designated|... fits better.
>
> I was irritated by your example, as well. Maybe, you can rework some
> exa
Am 13.01.2015 um 13:38 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
> When writing the :lanes-proposal I used those tags in an example. But in
> my opinion bicycle:lanes=...|designated|... fits better.
I was irritated by your example, as well. Maybe, you can rework some
examples and add them to the wiki. At least, mar
Well then: +1 to all. No exceptions.
Am 13. Januar 2015 14:01:16 MEZ, schrieb Martin Vonwald :
>2015-01-13 13:52 GMT+01:00 Hubert :
>
>> +1 to all. Except "none" in this case was meant to be the default
>value
>> from the :lanes proposal.
>>
>
>The "default value" is always an empty value, e.g. mi
2015-01-13 13:52 GMT+01:00 Hubert :
> +1 to all. Except "none" in this case was meant to be the default value
> from the :lanes proposal.
>
The "default value" is always an empty value, e.g. minspeed=|80|50. The
value "none" might be defined by the main key, e.g. maxspeed=none. If the
main key do
+1 to all. Except "none" in this case was meant to be the default value from
the :lanes proposal.
Am 13. Januar 2015 13:45:24 MEZ, schrieb Martin Vonwald :
>2015-01-13 13:38 GMT+01:00 Hubert :
>
>> I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes
>> defines es the type. So one
2015-01-13 13:38 GMT+01:00 Hubert :
> I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes
> defines es the type. So one could have cycleway:lanes:forward=none | lane
> and bicycle:lanes:forwad= yes | designated , for example.
>
That's correct. AFAIK it is common understanding, th
I would not. IMO bicycle:lanes is an access Tag while cycleway:lanes defines es
the type. So one could have cycleway:lanes:forward=none | lane and
bicycle:lanes:forwad= yes | designated , for example.
Am 13. Januar 2015 13:28:22 MEZ, schrieb Andrew Shadura :
>Hi,
>
>Some places in the wiki menti
When writing the :lanes-proposal I used those tags in an example. But in my
opinion bicycle:lanes=...|designated|... fits better.
"mass-replace" is a word that might cause some adverse reactions on this
mailing list ;-)
Have fun,
Martin
2015-01-13 13:28 GMT+01:00 Andrew Shadura :
> Hi,
>
> Som
Hi,
Some places in the wiki mention cycleway:lanes:* tags, and those are
indeed used in a few places (31 uses currently). It seems to me these
tags are obsolete and have been replaced by bicycle:lanes:*, is that
correct? Should I probably mass-replace them?
--
Cheers,
Andrew
_
