Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes on foot-cycle-paths

2020-02-05 Thread Hubert87

Hi,

I did some thing similar, too.

highway:lanes=cycleway|footway
surface:lanes=
width:lanes=

in addition to all the normal (fallback) tags.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27131742

Didn't use bicycle:lanes=designated|no or foot:lanes=no|designated though.
But I like it. I'm going to also do that in the future.


Yours

Am 04.02.2020 um 10:40 schrieb Volker Schmidt:

Thanks, Marc, for spotting the spelling error.

you seem to have a typo in the "foot:lanes=no|dsgnated"
But when I look at the Mapillary photo's I think there are 2 bicycle
lanes (one for each direction) and a sidewalk (there is a kerb) for
pedestrians.

Yes, there is a (mini-) kerb) and hence I could tag this as as two
separate ways.

Let's move to a nearby foot-cycle-way: Mapillary foto

I mapped it as a separate foot-cycle-path
 with segregation, because
it is separated from the main carriageway by metal arcs. So let me
repeat my question for this one:
how can I tag the relative position of the foot lane and the cycling
lane on this segregated foot-cycle-path?
Would
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=yes
bicycle:lanes=designated|no
foot:lanes=no|designated
width:lanes=2.5|1.5
width=4
a correct tagging?

Volker


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes on foot-cycle-paths

2020-02-04 Thread Volker Schmidt
Thanks, Marc, for spotting the spelling error.

you seem to have a typo in the "foot:lanes=no|dsgnated"
> But when I look at the Mapillary photo's I think there are 2 bicycle
> lanes (one for each direction) and a sidewalk (there is a kerb) for
> pedestrians.
>
Yes, there is a (mini-) kerb) and hence I could tag this as as two separate
ways.

Let's move to a nearby foot-cycle-way: Mapillary foto

I mapped it as a separate foot-cycle-path
 with segregation, because it
is separated from the main carriageway by metal arcs. So let me repeat my
question for this one:
how can I tag the relative position of the foot lane and the cycling lane
on this segregated foot-cycle-path?
Would
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=yes
bicycle:lanes=designated|no
foot:lanes=no|designated
width:lanes=2.5|1.5
width=4
a correct tagging?

Volker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes on foot-cycle-paths

2020-02-04 Thread Marc Gemis
Hello Volker,

you seem to have a typo in the "foot:lanes=no|dsgnated"
But when I look at the Mapillary photo's I think there are 2 bicycle
lanes (one for each direction) and a sidewalk (there is a kerb) for
pedestrians.

regards

m

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:02 PM Volker Schmidt  wrote:
>
> Please have a look at way 41506101 where I have used bicycle:lanes and 
> foot:lanes to indicate the relative position of the foot/cycle lanes on a 
> foot-cycle path with segregation.
> Is that a good approach to map this ?
> Are there better approaches to map the relative position?
> NB: I would not map this as two separate parallel ways as they are not 
> physically separate.
>
> Volker
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes on foot-cycle-paths

2020-02-03 Thread Volker Schmidt
I forgot to mention that you can look at the Mapillary photos
 to better
understand the situation.


On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 23:00, Volker Schmidt  wrote:

> Please have a look at way 41506101
>  where I have used
> bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes to indicate the relative position of the
> foot/cycle lanes on a foot-cycle path with segregation.
> Is that a good approach to map this ?
> Are there better approaches to map the relative position?
> NB: I would not map this as two separate parallel ways as they are not
> physically separate.
>
> Volker
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes on foot-cycle-paths

2020-02-03 Thread Volker Schmidt
Please have a look at way 41506101
 where I have used
bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes to indicate the relative position of the
foot/cycle lanes on a foot-cycle path with segregation.
Is that a good approach to map this ?
Are there better approaches to map the relative position?
NB: I would not map this as two separate parallel ways as they are not
physically separate.

Volker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging