Le 12.10.22 à 11:51, Illia Marchenko a écrit :
fixme=Review
I dislike the idea to add fixme for stuff that doesnn't
require to be fixed but are old (and old items should be
rechecked from time to time)!
if someone want to express the survey date, let's use survey:date
if someone want to
I think that retagging confirmed to be existing refugee sites and
deleting clearly invalid data would be better than turning it into more
camouflaged
suspect data.
Oct 12, 2022, 11:59 by annekadis...@web.de:
>
> I left 3 fixmes, even tried one in French, just in case.
>
>
> Anne
>
> On
I left 3 fixmes, even tried one in French, just in case.
Anne
On 12/10/2022 10:51, Illia Marchenko wrote:
I think that amenity=refugee_site & fixme=Review may be solution, it
isn't the ideal, but are better then leave "as is".
ср, 12 окт. 2022 г., 11:54 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
On
I think that amenity=refugee_site & fixme=Review may be solution, it isn't
the ideal, but are better then leave "as is".
ср, 12 окт. 2022 г., 11:54 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> On 12/10/22 02:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to re-tag those refugee camps in an
On 12/10/22 02:05, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> Would it be possible to re-tag those refugee camps in an automated
edit? … I'm not even sure if they all still exist 12 years later.
It would not be possible, because we do not know if they still exist.
So you leave them with an incorrect tag?
> Would it be possible to re-tag those refugee camps in an automated edit?
… I'm not even sure if they all still exist 12 years later.
It would not be possible, because we do not know if they still exist.
However a local mapper or someone who has visited the area could re-tag
them, after
Hello,
I noticed that many of the refugee camps in Haiti are tagged as
tourism=camp_site which made me uneasy. Turns out there is the tag
amenity=refugee_site. Would it be possible to re-tag those refugee camps
in an automated edit? There are about 60 or 70 mapped. I'm not even sure
if they all
