How am I supposed to do that? The requirements for cyclists and motorized
vehicles are vastly different. Even stronger, the very fact that something
is a good long-distance route for motorists would often make it a worse
candidate for cyclists,
This is exactly why you should not tag
Hi,
i.e. we have http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Class:bicycle
It has a -3...3 factor also for different groups of cyclists.
Am 02.10.2013, 14:27 Uhr, schrieb bredy bredy...@yahoo.it:
for me is not a good idea, there is just classification about it.
for me is not a good idea, there is just classification about it.
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/cycle-hierarchy-tp5779417p5779743.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Tagging mailing
2013/9/29 hamster hams...@suna.fdn.fr
I inform you that I have created a proposal for a set of tag to map
cycle hierarchy of roads, you can see here :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Hierarchy
One of the first things you point out is that the highway-classification
was a
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
One of the first things you point out is that the highway-classification
was a classification made for motorized vehicles, but this is not
completely true, instead, it is the classification of the road network
hello
I inform you that I have created a proposal for a set of tag to map
cycle hierarchy of roads, you can see here :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Hierarchy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
