On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 22:39, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> Last month I wrote about defining service=* tag values for
> railway=tram ways, which were previously not defined and used somewhat
> varyingly in the wild. Thanks Mateusz for your help refining the
> definitions!
>
> I have now written
>
Hi all,
Last month I wrote about defining service=* tag values for
railway=tram ways, which were previously not defined and used somewhat
varyingly in the wild. Thanks Mateusz for your help refining the
definitions!
I have now written
Jan 23, 2019, 3:53 PM by ja...@piorkowski.ca:
> I sense a potential difficulty in defining these with iron-clad
> accuracy. I'm not sure if that's needed, or is it acceptable to use a
> "you'll know it when you see it" guideline?
>
I would give up attempts at precise definitions that always
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 15:51, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Evertthing is right and welcome!
Cheers, thank you!
>> 1. no service tag recommended for tracks that are regularly used in
>> scheduled service, including loops and tail tracks
> Also part of loops that are never used to carry passengers,
Jan 19, 2019, 9:48 PM by ja...@piorkowski.ca:
> Hello,
>
> First time posting here, forgive if I've missed some rules.
>
Evertthing
is right and welcome!
>
> Summary: I wanted to refine tagging of some tram/streetcar tracks to
> show what they're used for, and found this isn't standardized
Hello,
First time posting here, forgive if I've missed some rules.
Summary: I wanted to refine tagging of some tram/streetcar tracks to
show what they're used for, and found this isn't standardized and
isn't documented.
I would like to suggest updating wiki for Key:service to specify
