Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment
> Am 16/feb/2014 um 01:06 schrieb Dave Swarthout : > I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more than > one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only that there is > at least one unit for rent on a short term basis. Therefore the plural > designation might often be wrong while the singular will not Ok, makes sense. But at least make sure that the documentation specifies what to do in case of multiple apartments for rent within one block: map all the apartments separately, or map the block only. -- Matthijs ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment
> Am 16/feb/2014 um 01:06 schrieb Dave Swarthout : > > I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more than > one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only that there is > at least one unit for rent on a short term basis. Therefore the plural > designation might often be wrong while the singular will not +1 cheers Martin___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment
bathtub furnished -- Alex On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Dan S wrote: > 2014-02-16 8:29 GMT+00:00 Philip Barnes : > > On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:06 +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote: > >> >I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. > >> > >> > >> I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more > >> than one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only > >> that there is at least one unit for rent on a short term basis. > >> Therefore the plural designation might often be wrong while the > >> singular will not. > >> > > +1 > > The plural also implies that all of the apartments in the building are > > available for short term holiday rental, whereas in reality there is > > likely to be a mix of rental and residential apartments in the building. > > > > Phil (trigpoint) > > FWIW, I too am happy with the singular tourism=apartment. > > I'll repeat what I said on the talk page: beds=* would be better as > capacity=*. Otherwise, looks OK to me. > > Best > Dan > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment
2014-02-16 8:29 GMT+00:00 Philip Barnes : > On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:06 +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote: >> >I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. >> >> >> I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more >> than one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only >> that there is at least one unit for rent on a short term basis. >> Therefore the plural designation might often be wrong while the >> singular will not. >> > +1 > The plural also implies that all of the apartments in the building are > available for short term holiday rental, whereas in reality there is > likely to be a mix of rental and residential apartments in the building. > > Phil (trigpoint) FWIW, I too am happy with the singular tourism=apartment. I'll repeat what I said on the talk page: beds=* would be better as capacity=*. Otherwise, looks OK to me. Best Dan ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 07:06 +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote: > >I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. > > > I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more > than one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only > that there is at least one unit for rent on a short term basis. > Therefore the plural designation might often be wrong while the > singular will not. > +1 The plural also implies that all of the apartments in the building are available for short term holiday rental, whereas in reality there is likely to be a mix of rental and residential apartments in the building. Phil (trigpoint) > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Matthijs Melissen > wrote: > I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. In the picture > in the > wiki page, you will not tag every individual apartment, but > rather the > entire block of apartment, right? > > -- Matthijs > > On 15 February 2014 20:30, nounours77 > wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > According to the results of the first RFC on my original > proposal tourism=holiday_flat, I renamed the tag > tourism=apartment. > > > > I therefore open a second (short) RFC phase on this: > > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apartment > > > > Many thanks for your inputs. > > > > greetings, nounours77 > > ___ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > > -- > Dave Swarthout > Homer, Alaska > Chiang Mai, Thailand > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment
>I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that *more than one unit is available* to rent while the singular implies only that there is *at least one *unit for rent on a short term basis. Therefore the plural designation might often be wrong while the singular will not. On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. In the picture in the > wiki page, you will not tag every individual apartment, but rather the > entire block of apartment, right? > > -- Matthijs > > On 15 February 2014 20:30, nounours77 > wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > According to the results of the first RFC on my original proposal > tourism=holiday_flat, I renamed the tag tourism=apartment. > > > > I therefore open a second (short) RFC phase on this: > > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apartment > > > > Many thanks for your inputs. > > > > greetings, nounours77 > > ___ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment
I would prefer the plural tourism=apartments. In the picture in the wiki page, you will not tag every individual apartment, but rather the entire block of apartment, right? -- Matthijs On 15 February 2014 20:30, nounours77 wrote: > Hi there, > > According to the results of the first RFC on my original proposal > tourism=holiday_flat, I renamed the tag tourism=apartment. > > I therefore open a second (short) RFC phase on this: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apartment > > Many thanks for your inputs. > > greetings, nounours77 > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment
Hi there, According to the results of the first RFC on my original proposal tourism=holiday_flat, I renamed the tag tourism=apartment. I therefore open a second (short) RFC phase on this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apartment Many thanks for your inputs. greetings, nounours77 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
