W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34, John Willis napisał(a):
I know there is a way to tag what the building as to what it was
initially used for - but i don't think that is the proper way (afaik).
So what do you think about building=church + amenity=museum then?
I think we need some clear, general
On 29 May 2015 at 12:42, Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl wrote:
W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34, John Willis napisał(a):
I know there is a way to tag what the building as to what it was
initially used for - but i don't think that is the proper way (afaik).
So what do you think about building=church +
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 12:47 +0100, pmailkeey . wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 12:42, Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl wrote:
W dniu 29.05.2015 13:34, John Willis napisał(a):
I know there is a way to tag what the building as to
what it was
Sent from my iPhone
On May 29, 2015, at 9:28 PM, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
Although not the type of amenity estate agents usually describe.
[pure speculation on my part] that is because the amenity tag originally was
for the amenities of a town.
Over time, as tagging
