Re: [Tagging] office=healthcare deprecated or bad documentation ?

On 12/05/2023 21:16, Marc_marc wrote: Hello, in 2020, the wiki was changed [|] for this tag (I don't remeber that we talk about it, no link in the comment of the change) [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:office%3Dhealthcare=prev=2062630 See also discussion at

[Tagging] office=healthcare deprecated or bad documentation ?

Hello, in 2020, the wiki was changed [|] for this tag (I don't remeber that we talk about it, no link in the comment of the change) it is obviously wrong to use it for amenity=doctors or other examples of reported errors. however the correct usage (an office dealing with health but not a

Re: [Tagging] office=therapist??

sent from a phone > On 14. Apr 2017, at 11:23, Thilo Haug OSM wrote: > > "office" is really strange well, it is strange in Italian and German, but maybe not in English as I found out. But still, looking at the other office values it is kind of an outlier. I agree with Marc

Re: [Tagging] office=therapist??

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Thilo Haug OSM wrote: > I think it's similar to : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage > > "office" is really strange For me it's part of the healthcare 2.0 mapping. see

Re: [Tagging] office=therapist??

I think it's similar to : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage "office" is really strange Am 13.04.2017 um 23:23 schrieb John Willis: > > > Javbw > > On Apr 14, 2017, at 4:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > > wrote: > >> Looking

Re: [Tagging] office=therapist??

Javbw > On Apr 14, 2017, at 4:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > Looking through the current list of documented office values I came across so > that really sound odd to me, e.g. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dtherapist > > wouldn't this

[Tagging] office=therapist??

Looking through the current list of documented office values I came across so that really sound odd to me, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dtherapist wouldn't this be much better suited for the amenity tag? cheers, Martin sent from a

Re: [Tagging] office=kjuilmn ?

it is fairly self explanatory and is in common usage, ngo that means nothing to me. Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 13/08/2013 18:07 Volker Schmidt wrote: There is another frequently used value in the same category: office=ngo Want to change that as well? I am unsure how strict

[Tagging] office=kjuilmn ?

During my updates of some wiki translations, I discovered the map featured tag office=it. When you asked yourself what means my message title office=kjuilmn, then you feel like an average contributor reading office=it for the first time. Here is our wiki about it:

Re: [Tagging] office=kjuilmn ?

Il giorno 13/ago/2013, alle ore 14:28, Pieren pier...@gmail.com ha scritto: means we should really avoid abbreviations in main tags (sub-tags can be discussed). That's why I would like to change the wiki to e.g. office=information_technology and check (on talk list) if it can be changed in

Re: [Tagging] office=kjuilmn ?

There is another frequently used value in the same category: office=ngo Want to change that as well? I am unsure how strict we should be in this no-abbrevation business For me it seems OK as is. On 13 August 2013 15:26, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Il giorno 13/ago/2013,

[Tagging] office=administrative...

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:officeoldid=573918diff=next That is kind of contradictive, since local authorities are also government and I don't think there is sufficient need to distinguish between local, state and federal (where applicable) offices, the

Re: [Tagging] office=*

On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:19 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote: Others disagree strongly that there is even a point to voting, if there is a problem this usually shows during discussions. We all agree that voting is not appropriate. Replace it by opinion poll. Pieren

Re: [Tagging] office=*

On 29 July 2010 19:45, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: We all agree that voting is not appropriate. Replace it by opinion poll. What about general agreement on the mailing list? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] office=*

I'm confused because I was thinking that tags on Map_Features page were all approved tags.. Sometimes even approved tags are not useful. I tagged a large number of approved contact:phone= , but found that OSM map data consumers I looked at all used the *disapproved* tag phone=. Tagwatch

Re: [Tagging] office=*

On 29 July 2010 01:19, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote: - Should I just put a redirect to office= on the proposal pages? Up to you, alternatively you can just copy and paste bits of content/text that would be useful... ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] office=*

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote: There is no process. That's simply not true and you know it. It's a big difference between there is no process and I don't want to follow a process. Pieren ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] office=*

On 29 July 2010 15:13, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: 5-10k mappers doesn't work, but skipping discussion and inventing tags Don't confuse discussion with voting, voting is flawed and many things are still discussed on the tagging list before being documented on the wiki. based on

Re: [Tagging] office=*

John Smith wrote: On 29 July 2010 15:13, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: 5-10k mappers doesn't work, but skipping discussion and inventing tags Don't confuse discussion with voting, voting is flawed and many things are still discussed on the tagging list before being documented on