Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-09-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Do., 19. Sept. 2019 um 09:20 Uhr schrieb Valor Naram via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > Let me summarize > > Why `phone`: > - It's more used > - It's shorter > - Better to find in wiki > > Why `contact:phone`: > - It's more structured because it's a subkey of `contact` > - It's better

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-09-19 Thread Valor Naram via Tagging
Let me summarizeWhy `phone`:- It's more used- It's shorter- Better to find in wikiWhy `contact:phone`:- It's more structured because it's a subkey of `contact`- It's better to find in wiki (for people who think in a "more structured" way)- It's the approved oneBoth let us add more subkeys like

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-26 Thread Colin Smale
On 2019-08-26 15:53, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > sent from a phone > > On 25. Aug 2019, at 18:06, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > there are at least two possibilities: > phone= > phone:emergency= > phone:staff= > > and: > phone= > emergency:phone= > staff:phone= > > Neither of which requires

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25. Aug 2019, at 18:06, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > there are at least two possibilities: > > > phone= > phone:emergency= > phone:staff= > > and: > > phone= > emergency:phone= > staff:phone= > > Neither of which requires "contact:" exactly, I was about to reply the

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Warin
On 26/08/19 00:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 25. Aug 2019, at 07:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: Type 'phone' into the OSMwiki search box and you get redirected to the key 'phone=*'. This gets preferential treatment to the key 'contact:phone=*'. seems fair

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 05:58, marc marc wrote: > > phone=number1;number2 > ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26861282 But that wouldn't allow you to specify what the different numbers are for, would it? eg phone=general_enquiries:number1;service:number2 Thanks Graeme

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread marc marc
Le 25.08.19 à 17:42, Colin Smale a écrit : > Your model (using only phone=*) only allows an object to have a single > phone number. not true. phone=number1;number2 ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26861282 18219 discint value for a total of 19694 count > one for general enquiries, one for

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Andrew Hain
August 2019 17:40 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact don't provide any tagging method to tag numbers

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Valor Naram
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact don't provide any tagging method to tag numbers for emergency, general enquiries etc. Both keys just allow the tagging of one phone number on one object.But feel free to write a proposal to extend the

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 16:42, Colin Smale wrote: > > Your model (using only phone=*) only allows an object to have a single phone > number. How do you propose modelling multiple phone numbers on a single > object? For example, one for general enquiries, one for emergencies, one for > staff,...

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Paul Allen
On Sun, 25 Aug 2019 at 16:46, Colin Smale wrote: > Your model (using only phone=*) only allows an object to have a single > phone number. How do you propose modelling multiple phone numbers on a > single object? For example, one for general enquiries, one for emergencies, > one for staff,... >

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Colin Smale
ing `contact:phone` > > Original Message ---- > Subject: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one > purpose > From: Martin Koppenhoefer > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > CC: > >> sent from a phone >>

Re: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Valor Naram
> What about deprecating the contact: prefix, at least for phone? It doesn’t seem it will ever make it and is basically a deliberate tag fragmentation.Yes, I recommend deprecating `contact:phone` Original Message Subject: [Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for

[Tagging] phone vs contact:phone WAS Re: Multiple tags for one purpose

2019-08-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25. Aug 2019, at 07:20, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Type 'phone' into the OSMwiki search box and you get redirected to the key > 'phone=*'. > This gets preferential treatment to the key 'contact:phone=*'. seems fair that “key:phone” shows up first for a