sent from a phone
> On 25. Jul 2017, at 10:17, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> in which cases do you check the history ? If I have a photo (or any
> other survey material) that show a different reality than what is
> mapped, why would I then check the source ?
+1, I also see no point in these source t
Hello Ralph,
I also use josm and his history/changeset/diff function, is's nice.
But as you said yourself, all info you put at the chansetset level are
easy to read... if other mapper want it !
So if comment/source/date is in changeset tag, why duplicate it on every
object ? just in case that a
2 years old so it is not reliable for up-to-date
> information.
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
>
>
> From: marc marc
> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:11 PM
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> Subject: [Tagging] source tag on object <
marc
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:11 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [Tagging] source tag on object <> changeset
I create a new thread because it have no link with a tree :-)
Le 22. 07. 17 à 22:20, ael a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 08:51:16PM +0200, Si
On 23.07.2017 01:28, marc marc wrote:
JOSM ctrl-h
ctrl-h give the whole history and you need to diff manually
it is what i already do :-)
i'm talking about the history/source of ONE/EVERY tag
for exemple a object have a ele tag. witch changeset create/modify it ?
it parse the history, find tha
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:09 AM, marc marc
wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 08:51:16PM +0200, Simon Poole wrote:
> >> a) good practice to tag source on the changeset.
> > I always include a fairly comprehensive list
> > of sources on changesets, but *need* individual source tags
> > on ob
I create a new thread because it have no link with a tree :-)
Le 22. 07. 17 à 22:20, ael a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 08:51:16PM +0200, Simon Poole wrote:
>> a) good practice to tag source on the changeset.
> I always include a fairly comprehensive list
> of sources on changesets, but *
