On 07.07.2013 18:33, fly wrote:
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
task for a bot.
It was originally broad_leafed in the Wiki, but it was considered a spelling
error and therefore it was
There are species that are both broad-leaved and evergreen. One example would
be magnolia trees. They drop old leaves in the spring, as new leaves grow. At
no time is the tree leafless.
John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
Am 07.07.2013 19:32, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
On 07.07.2013 18:59, John Sturdy wrote:
On further thought, I'd go for type=deciduous, rather than
broad-lea[fv]ed. Not quite the same thing (I think larches are
deciduous but not broad-leaved) but I think it's the normal technical
term (the others
On 07/07/2013 17:33, fly wrote:
Hey
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is.
The Oxford English Dictionary has broad-leaved as the headword, with
broad-leafed as a variant form. The latest edition of the Shorter Oxford
English Dictionary has
Hey
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
task for a bot.
On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use type=* and not
tree_type=* or tree:type=* as type is the key for relations and it
Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly:
Hey
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
task for a bot.
Sorry, numbers are towards leaved.
On the other hand, I wonder if it is useful to use type=*
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:33 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
task for a bot.
I'm pretty sure it's broad-leaved. The other sounds only
On 07.07.2013 18:47, fly wrote:
Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly:
Hey
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
task for a bot.
Sorry, numbers are towards leaved.
Numbers are not
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly:
Hey
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is. Numbers are almost even in the data. Probably, a nice
task for a bot.
Sorry, numbers are
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 5:47 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 07.07.2013 18:33, schrieb fly:
Hey
Could an BE-speaking person please tell me what the right spelling for
broad_leafed is. Numbers are
On 07.07.2013 18:59, John Sturdy wrote:
On further thought, I'd go for type=deciduous, rather than
broad-lea[fv]ed. Not quite the same thing (I think larches are
deciduous but not broad-leaved) but I think it's the normal technical
term (the others being evergreen).
That would make the
11 matches
Mail list logo
