Re: [Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-04 Thread Ulf Lamping

Am 04.11.2010 06:17, schrieb Paul Johnson:

On 11/03/2010 01:39 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:

The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should
be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times
more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database.


I don't think it's a common agreement by any means, URL is more
universal and includes websites;


Well, url is a bit too generic IMHO and comes from the days when it was 
completely unclear how urls and alike will be tagged by our mappers.



In common use today is:

website=
image=
wikipedia=
email=
(... and url=)

Don't know if that qualifies as url being deprecated though ;-)

For some time there was quite a confusion between url and website, and 
people used url where website really would fit better as it is more 
specific both for mappers and data users alike.


That doesn't mean you shouldn't use url at all, but if you tag the 
website for a specific object, you should use website rather than url.


Think of use url if you know what you are doing, website probably 
better suits what you want to tag :-)



websites excludes many types of URLs.


I've not seen a lot else used than the above mentioned so far ...

Regards, ULFL

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-03 Thread Tobias Knerr
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should
 be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times
 more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database.

website is intended for the official website for a feature.

url was never as clearly defined and is therefore used for lots of
different stuff, including Wikipedia links, photographs and internal
(= intended for other mappers) documentation.

Therefore, website does *not* replace url - it should only replace
url for those cases where the URL is the official website for the
tagged feature.
Similarly, the wikipedia key should partially replace url, for those
cases where the URL is a Wikipedia link, and image should be used for
URLs of images.

Tobias Knerr

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-03 Thread Noel David Torres Taño
On Miércoles 03 Noviembre 2010 19:14:45 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió:
 2010/11/3 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
  M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
  The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should
  be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times
  more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database.
  
  website is intended for the official website for a feature.
  
  url was never as clearly defined and is therefore used for lots of
  different stuff, including Wikipedia links, photographs and internal
  (= intended for other mappers) documentation.
  
  Therefore, website does *not* replace url - it should only replace
  url for those cases where the URL is the official website for the
  tagged feature.
  Similarly, the wikipedia key should partially replace url, for those
  cases where the URL is a Wikipedia link, and image should be used for
  URLs of images.
 
 If there is consensus for this interpretation, the mapfeatures are
 wrong IMHO. They depict url as deprecated (stroked through).
 
 Cheers,
 Martin
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Tobias's interpretation sounds very good to me

Noel
er Envite


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-03 Thread Paul Johnson
On 11/03/2010 01:39 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
 The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should
 be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times
 more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database.

I don't think it's a common agreement by any means, URL is more
universal and includes websites; websites excludes many types of URLs.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging