Re: [Tagging] wall and block that aren't a barrier

2018-06-12 Thread Lionel Giard
The main idea that i got for barrier=retaining_wall is to indicate that between the lower ground and the upper ground, there is a retaining wall preventing the movement to got this way (most probably, car or bicycle can't go through the retaining wall easily, as it act like a small "cliff"). That's

[Tagging] wall and block that aren't a barrier

2018-06-11 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 09.06.2018 23:13, marc marc wrote: > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/Rehbrunnen_04.jpg/800px-Rehbrunnen_04.jpg Based on this picture, the current mapping is clearly incorrect. This basin doesn't qualify as a barrier=retaining_wall even if we allow for a very generous r

Re: [Tagging] wall and block that aren't a barrier

2018-06-09 Thread Paul Allen
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/ > Rehbrunnen_04.jpg/800px-Rehbrunnen_04.jpg > It strikes me that the water container was modelled after a horse trough. Some public fountains with that form may even have originated as horse troughs (and some may even be used as such tod

Re: [Tagging] wall and block that aren't a barrier

2018-06-09 Thread marc marc
Le 09. 06. 18 à 22:59, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > 9. Jun 2018 22:02 by marc_marc : > > man_made=pillar ? but it's obsoleted > > > If it is the best fit it may be used. > > > Image of the fountain would be helpful. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/Rehbrunnen_04.

Re: [Tagging] wall and block that aren't a barrier

2018-06-09 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
9. Jun 2018 22:02 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com : > man_made=pillar ? but it's obsoleted > If it is the best fit it may be used.  Image of the fountain would be helpful. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstr

[Tagging] wall and block that aren't a barrier

2018-06-09 Thread marc marc
Hello, a mapper map small fountain with polygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/8322503 I have nothing against the idea even if I would have used a node for such a small object Of course amenity=fountain must be moved to the MP relation with 2 polygons in stead of a invalid one. B