Hi,
the wiki page of leisure=garden says that every ordinary garden, which
is not accessible by the public (not even once), can be tagged as
leisure=garden. You just have to tag it to access=private.
I actually do not think that this is helpful for anybody.
On the other hand: Isn't it already
It should not be changed, garden is garden - private or not.
Filtering out access=private to show only public ones is trivial.
I see also no arguments for changing meaning of tag used over 150k times.
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 01:37:06 -0800 cracklinrain
lt;cra_klinr...@gmx.degt; wrote
Hello,
I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used
military equipment.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus
my english is limited ...
cordially.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2013/12/5 cracklinrain cra_klinr...@gmx.de
What do you think?
have a look at garden:type and garden:style if you are interested in
further details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Garden_specification
cheers,
Martin
___
Axelos wrote:
I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used
military equipment.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus
If you think that it makes sense to tag a particular shop that way just
go ahead and use it. You can use any tags you like. Taginfo
On 2013-12-05 12:16, SomeoneElse wrote :
Axelos wrote:
I proposed the tag shop=military_surplus for the shops selling used
military equipment.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Military_surplus
my english is limited ...
We did not notice (limited).
If you think that it makes sense to tag
2013/12/5 Wolfgang Hinsch osm-lis...@ivkasogis.de
how should it be tagged? Is it ok to tag the whole residential area
between the streets as one leisure=garden including all buildings etc.
or shall every garden be tagged as leisure=garden separately in it's
place and only there?
I would
Am 05.12.2013 18:46, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
I would only use it on the effective garden area, overlapping the
landuse=residential area. Buildings and non-garden areas should not be
included.
This in combination with garden:type and garden:style does make sense.
But until now I did not
2013/12/5 cracklinrain cra_klinr...@gmx.de
Some building=hut maybe included - in my opinion this does not
matter.
if it's in the garden, why not.
Actually usually gardens are distinct from each other. How will you map
this? I mean leisure=garden is not like landuse covering hundreds of
+1, it seems quite obvious.
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:46:55 -0800 Martin Koppenhoefer
lt;dieterdre...@gmail.comgt; wrote
2013/12/5 Wolfgang Hinsch lt;osm-lis...@ivkasogis.degt;
how should it be tagged? Is it ok to tag the whole residential area
between the streets as one
I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private) ground
in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees,
sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in the OSM database.
Cheers,
Masi
Am
Hi list,
I have created a proposal page to describe Baby care schema.
It's now on RFC stage with this mail.
Please feel free to add your comments on the page.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/babycare
Previous discussion log on this ML is found here.
Am 06.12.2013 02:05, schrieb Masi Master:
I think we don't should tag something at a private (really private)
ground in a residential (except the house, entrance and way to it).
IMO we don't need any private things like swimmingpools, ways, trees,
sandboxes or playgrounds at the backyard in
13 matches
Mail list logo
