sent from a phone
Am 28.07.2015 um 11:29 schrieb Kotya Karapetyan kotya.li...@gmail.com:
information=reception
I see information slightly different from reception: information is for
everybody and does not include something like a kind of check in, a reception
treats people different
Hi,
we have a following issue at mapy.cz (zooms cca 13 are OSM data). We try
to render primary road overview in Czech republic, so the drivers could
easily see where its possible to drive. But sometimes the primary road ends
and continues as a secondary road - it could be in cites, or possibly
sent from a phone
Am 28.07.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Pavel Zbytovský zbytov...@gmail.com:
1) technically the small secondary roads part works as primary road network.
So we would suggest a tag similar to works_as_highway=primary. Do you think
its ok? Any suggestions?
from what you have
2015-07-28 23:59 GMT+02:00 Hubert sg.fo...@gmx.de:
On 28. Juli 2015 22:32 Ruben Maes [mailto:ruben.mae...@gmail.com] wrote:
2015-07-25 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com:
It's also perhaps worth mentioning that the 18th Feb change (which you
- and I - preferred the previous version
On 28/07/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 28.07.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Pavel Zbytovský zbytov...@gmail.com:
1) technically the small secondary roads part works as primary road
network. So we would suggest a tag similar to works_as_highway=primary. Do
you think its ok?
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:14 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com
wrote:
That ideal doesn't match the practical reality. highway=primary has a
very different definition between Ethiopia and Germany, by necessity.
While they can be very different, a router should still be able to prefer a
On 28/07/2015, Pavel Zbytovský zbytov...@gmail.com wrote:
Since nobody objected much, i would probably go with
works_as_highway=primary - i think it reflects the state of reality, so its
useful to be added in OSM dataset.
FWIW, I'm not a big fan of this, because it is just a variation of
sent from a phone
Am 28.07.2015 um 16:14 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com:
Sorry but no, too simplistic. A lot of local OSM communities follow
the official national road classification where possible.
That's too simplistic ;-)
That ideal doesn't match the practical
Thanks for updates, yes, we have similar rules as Ireland.
Since nobody objected much, i would probably go with
works_as_highway=primary - i think it reflects the state of reality, so its
useful to be added in OSM dataset.
Regards,
Pavel
út 28. 7. 2015 v 16:33 odesílatel Marc Gemis
On 28/07/2015, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:14 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com
wrote:
That ideal doesn't match the practical reality. highway=primary has a
very different definition between Ethiopia and Germany, by necessity.
While they can be
On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:29 AM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote:
One routing error that came up recently is a trunk with a lower than
typical maxspeed, and a trunk_link without a maxspeed tag. The router
used its default idea of maxspeed for that link, and tried to use it
as a
uto, 28. srp 2015. 11:53 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com je
napisao:
from what you have written it seems to me that these are tagging errors:
if a road works as primary it should get the primary tag in osm.
Country specific deviations that result from following different criteria
FYI: I just took the liberty of changing the highway=footway definition back to
the pre Feb 18th Version.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Townsend [mailto:ajt1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Samstag, 25. Juli 2015 15:25
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] access=designated wiki
On
sent from a phone
Am 28.07.2015 um 17:57 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com:
That said, I don't see a better tag that your style could use to
decide displaying that road
rather than adding a tag: render like a primary you should check what it is
that you are after (e.g.
On 28/07/2015 17:35, Hubert wrote:
FYI: I just took the liberty of changing the highway=footway definition back to
the pre Feb 18th Version.
\o/
Thanks for that.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2015-07-25 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com:
On 25/07/2015 13:43, Hubert wrote:
It's also perhaps worth mentioning that the 18th Feb
change (which you - and I - preferred the previous version to) was made by a
wiki editor who's since been blocked (3).
(3)
For clarification: I didn't write that.
On 28. Juli 2015 22:32 Ruben Maes [mailto:ruben.mae...@gmail.com] wrote:
2015-07-25 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com:
On 25/07/2015 13:43, Hubert wrote:
It's also perhaps worth mentioning that the 18th Feb change (which you
- and I -
17 matches
Mail list logo
