Re: [Tagging] Formally informal sidewalks

Le 13. 07. 17 à 15:28, Svavar Kjarrval a écrit : > the local public transport authority started utilising OSM good :-) > 1. Sometimes streets don't have formal sidewalks (no markings on the > street nor signs) but there is an "common sense expectation" that > pedestrians are allowed to traverse

Re: [Tagging] Formally informal sidewalks

sent from a phone > On 13. Jul 2017, at 15:28, Svavar Kjarrval wrote: > > 1. Sometimes streets don't have formal sidewalks (no markings on the > street nor signs) but there is an "common sense expectation" that > pedestrians are allowed to traverse on the edge of that

[Tagging] Formally informal sidewalks

Hi. A few months ago the local public transport authority started utilising OSM data to offer a service where people can type in two addresses and receive an interactive map with suggested bus routes, including the path between the addresses and the suggested bus stops. The estimated walking

Re: [Tagging] Formally informal sidewalks

> On Jul 13, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Svavar Kjarrval wrote: > > when the "common sense" approach would be to "just go > across the street". This is a question I have too, and I’m wondering if this is something you solve at the tagging or engine level. Afaik, this is why the

Re: [Tagging] Formally informal sidewalks

Perhaps a few links to photos would help? It'd make it a lot easier for other people to visualise. Best Regards, Andy ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] direction value for panorama view?

Since OpenTopoMap announced [1] a customize rendering for the tourism=viewpoint [4] symbol depend on direction, we discuss [2] what would be the correct value for the 360 panorama view. The wiki [3] defined values from 0 to 359 (!). Range values aren't defined yet, but are in use, because it's