Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] how to map a fr:talus?

I have had a look on the Wallonia website. If you zoom out you will see that this feature runs exactly parallel to the road to the south of it. It is man made. It would have been created at the same time as the road. It was done to raise the road to a higher level as a flood defence against the

Re: [Tagging] opening_hours for public transport routes?

On 13-11-17 01:51, Albert Pundt wrote: Is it common practice to represent the starts/ends of public transport route schedules with the opening_hours tag? For example, Red Rose Transit Route 1 in Lancaster, PA uses this

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk-be] how to map a fr:talus?

On 2017-11-24 10:55, ralph.ayt...@ntlworld.com wrote: > > I have had a look on the Wallonia website. If you zoom out you will > see that this feature runs exactly parallel to the road to the south > of it. It is man made. It would have been created at the same time as > the road. It was done to

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:05:10AM +0100, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > Hi > > How is this kind of road barrier that prevents access for motor > vehicles but allows pedestrians and cyclists to pass on both sides > best tagged? > > > I have

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

Most data consumers seem to treat barrier=* as access=no by default; it's a good idea with barriers to explicitly tag for access on barriers. On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:24 PM, marc marc wrote: > Le 25. 11. 17 à 00:05, Selfish Seahorse a écrit : > >

[Tagging] Road barrier

Hi How is this kind of road barrier that prevents access for motor vehicles but allows pedestrians and cyclists to pass on both sides best tagged? Is barrier = yes (+ bicycle = yes + foot = yes + motor_vehicle = no) enough information

Re: [Tagging] Road barrier

Le 25. 11. 17 à 00:05, Selfish Seahorse a écrit : > > > Is barrier = yes (+ bicycle = yes + foot = yes + motor_vehicle = no) > enough information for routing engines? This sign doesn't block mofa. I tag this as : motorcar=no