Re: [Tagging] Documentation issues of PT tagging schemes

2018-08-04 Thread Jo
Hi Roland, I made a fresh attempt to explain things as simple as it gets: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Polyglot/Public_transport_proposal_for_simplification I might expand this to how I see we could extend this tram and metro mapping. For trains I would add such nodes for each sub

[Tagging] building:flats

2018-08-04 Thread Andrew Harvey
The building:flats key[1] is documented on the wiki as "number of residential units (flats, apartments) in an apartment building, residential building, house, detached house or similar building". It's a useful tag indicating the density of the building when combined with geometry and height (or

[Tagging] healthcare : nurse <> nursing_home <> nursing

2018-08-04 Thread marc marc
Hello, I'm trying to help a mapper to add the premise where a nurse works According to taginfo, several healthcare=* value look like similar https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=healthcare#values nurse 44 nursing_home 39 nursing 24 Home_Nursing 1 wiki seem to only have one of them (and

Re: [Tagging] building:flats

2018-08-04 Thread marc marc
Le 05. 08. 18 à 00:47, Andrew Harvey a écrit : > What's the process to change the Status from "In use" to "Approved"? write a propal, request for comment, call for voting https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process it would be interesting to see how much to see the tag was used exept by

Re: [Tagging] building:flats

2018-08-04 Thread Warin
On 05/08/18 08:59, marc marc wrote: Le 05. 08. 18 à 00:47, Andrew Harvey a écrit : What's the process to change the Status from "In use" to "Approved"? write a propal, request for comment, call for voting https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process it would be interesting to see how

Re: [Tagging] landuse=clearing

2018-08-04 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: Presently landcover=clearing is fourth on the list of how to map, with > discouraging words attached. > That list doesn't read that way to me. It appears to conflate two different things: a list of increasingly-better

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Line clamps

2018-08-04 Thread François Lacombe
Hi 2018-08-03 15:34 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen : > > The documentation is a little unclear. What I think you may mean (because > it doesn't lose information if you > do it this way) isline_clamp:1 is the top row, and you might have > line_clamp:1=suspension;pin;suspension. If that is > what you mean

Re: [Tagging] landuse=clearing

2018-08-04 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you have any ideas on how to write a wiki page that discourages the use > of the tag but documents it, I'm all ears. > A further thought. Create landuse=clearing and landcover=clearing pages but make them redirects to a

Re: [Tagging] landuse=clearing

2018-08-04 Thread Warin
On 04/08/18 22:21, Paul Allen wrote: On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: Presently landcover=clearing is fourth on the list of how to map, with discouraging words attached. That list doesn't read that way to me.  It

Re: [Tagging] landuse=clearing

2018-08-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 4. Aug 2018, at 01:43, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As this is not a 'landuse' but a landcover I think moving it to > landcover=clearing would be a good first step. -1, “clearing” is neither a landuse nor a landcover. cheers, Martin

Re: [Tagging] landuse=clearing

2018-08-04 Thread Warin
On 04/08/18 16:28, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 4. Aug 2018, at 01:43, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: As this is not a 'landuse' but a landcover I think moving it to landcover=clearing would be a good first step. -1, “clearing” is neither a landuse nor a