sent from a phone
> On 13. Sep 2019, at 17:28, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> part_of_a_group=yes tag. And even without any of that,
> an overpass query in the general area for artwork_type=statue + other tags
> they have in
> common will find them.
actually there is a relation for groups:
I would absolutely agree with this use case. Especially for cases such as the
regularly mentioned Burger King. If somebody from out of town is either
traveling through or armchair mapping they could be confused. If they are
using the ID editor, it suggests that you "upgrade the tags" which
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 16:49, Ruben wrote:
>
> There has been discussion about this on the forum:
> https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66456
>
> I had drafted a (in retrospect not perfect) proposal as well:
>
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 16:27, Janko Mihelić wrote:
So maybe the right way is to go case by case, and see how to deal with
> them.
>
Sounds like a plan. If you find something exceptional, we'll try to figure
out what to do with
it.
For example, a lot of rails and motorways have all ways
I am leaning to supporting the tag, because it offers a standard way to
give specific hints for some special cases. The risk is that the tag could
in theory be added with infinite value lists to any object, but we should
not expect it to happen ;-)
Cheers,
Martin
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:07:13 +0100, Paul Allen wrote:
> I'm not sure if there's a generally-accepted
> term for this
> in British English yet. I've seen "zero waste" (misleading, because it's
> not zero) and
> "unpackaged" (also misleading as it is in a package, just not a package
> that you can
"noname=yes" is used when a feature like a road doesn't have a name.
The tag :not:name=XXX" is used when mappers might think that the name
is actually "XXX" but it's not. Usually the "name=" field is already
set with the correct name: 96% of objects with "not:name" have a
"name=*" - see
Am Sa., 14. Sept. 2019 um 07:05 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <
joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>:
> I've added "amenity=music_school" back to the Map Features list, since
> it looks like there is consensus that this is different than
> amenity=college and there is not other tag for this feature at this
+1 for the not: namespace. It stops people inventing new negation tags with
slightly different wording. Searches could take it into account even.
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019, 07:25 Joseph Eisenberg,
wrote:
> "noname=yes" is used when a feature like a road doesn't have a name.
>
> The tag :not:name=XXX"
I think so?
The definition is "an educational institution specialized in the
study, training, and research of music. ...
"... There are also private music schools which can have the same
offer as public music schools or are limited to some part of musical
education."
So it's probably a
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 08:17, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> +1 for the not: namespace.
>
+1
It may be applicable to other tags on objects which are prone to
misidentification and
which are not better handled by lifestyle prefixes. Where an object is no
longer used as
an X (or used for anything else
I think "not:brand" and "not:brand:wikidata" should only be used when
the name of the feature or the brand of the feature is identical (or
nearly identical) to a well-known brand.
- Joseph
On 9/14/19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I am leaning to supporting the tag, because it offers a standard
And type=site - but none of those three types of relation are widely
supported by database users.
On 9/14/19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 13. Sep 2019, at 17:28, Paul Allen wrote:
>>
>> part_of_a_group=yes tag. And even without any of that,
>> an overpass query
What I got out of this discussion is, part:wikidata will probably not be
widely used, but people still agree that most of the wikidata tags that are
on multiple OSM objects are wrongly tagged. So maybe the right way is to go
case by case, and see how to deal with them.
For example, a lot of rails
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:59:29 +1000, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 'opening_hours="By appointment, phone "' (the ### is the phone number
> that I don't recall of the top of my head.
>
> I think this is more versatile than yet another value as it allows an
> individual response in
sent from a phone
> On 13. Sep 2019, at 19:42, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> BTW, a better way for marking Roman roads would be to use
> historic=roman_road. It's a
> lapsed proposal, and doesn't show even on lutz's historic places map, but it
> would allow
> a simple overpass-turbo query and
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:59 AM Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Anyone who thinks the preceding paragraph is off-topic because it's about
> Wikimedia should try to recall all the times on this list when somebody has
> insisted that rules is rules, even when the outcome of following those
> rules is
Am Fr., 13. Sept. 2019 um 14:09 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen :
>
> In British English (which OSM generally uses) "bulk" means "being large
> in size, mass or
> volume (of goods, etc.)." See https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bulk
>
it also means "Unpackaged goods when transported in large volumes, e.g.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 21:06, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> 13 Sep 2019, 20:28 by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
>
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 13:41, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>>> You have examples like tagging all ways that are a part of a street with
>>> the wikidata item about that street. You can't
On Sat, 14 Sep 2019 at 19:22, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> yes, or historic=road with historic:civilization=ancient_roman
>
> I’ve used both variants in the past but just had a second thought: is this
> about roads that are still with the original paving or also applicable to
> roads that were
On 15/09/19 01:59, Ruben wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:59:29 +1000, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
'opening_hours="By appointment, phone "' (the ### is the phone number that
I don't recall of the top of my head.
I think this is more versatile than yet another value as it allows an
Also, the English page was originally translated from the German page,
which has the description "Musikschule" - so it fits.
"Darüber hinaus bieten auch private Musikschulen ein gleichwertiges
oder ein auf bestimmte Bereich der Musikbildung beschränktes Angebot
an."
On 9/14/19, Joseph Eisenberg
22 matches
Mail list logo
