> Hi Joseph, the mappers will survey the buildings with mapillary imagery that
> we upload for them, these buildings are already mapped in the Openstreetmap
> Database, but as a generic tag like "building=yes"
Great. It is helpful to update the building tag to a more precise value.
But as
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
disused:building=service
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 19:13, s8evq wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> How would you tag a small building that used to be an electricity building
> where the army put power generators for the (backup) power of an airfield.
>
building=service
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 5:24 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
>
> disused:building=service
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 19:13, s8evq wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> How would you tag a small building that used to be an electricity
>>
Hi everyone,
How would you tag a small building that used to be an electricity building
where the army put power generators for the (backup) power of an airfield. This
is not used anymore by the army. They transformed these little house to provide
ideal conditions for bats to live in. (close
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 12:51, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> man_made=nesting_site is a good addition. But the current description
> suggests that it is "mounted on a support". Is that a requirement for
> using the tag?
>
It is clear from the first image on the page that "support" has a broader
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 12:24, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
>
> disused:building=service
>
This, and:
man_made=nesting_site
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dnesting_site
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 19:13, s8evq wrote:
>
>> Hi
I don't think disused:building is the correct key. This is still a
building=service, it's just being used to house bats instead of
equipment. It is still a building.
man_made=nesting_site is a good addition. But the current description
suggests that it is "mounted on a support". Is that a
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 02:08, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I refer to the 'address' of the Barkly Homestead;
>
>
> "PRIVATE MAIL BAG 32
> Tennant Creek
> Northern Territory 0862
>
I would tag the building as addr:housename=Barkly Homestead,
addr:city=Tennant
Creek, etc. Actually,
I guess it depends on what state the building is in, eg if it's been gutted
and in need of a lot of maintenance to be a functional service building
then I'd probably still use the lifecycle prefix.
I thought about disused:building:use=service but not sure...
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 23:51, Joseph
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 13:26, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> I guess it depends on what state the building is in, eg if it's been
> gutted and in need of a lot of maintenance to be a functional service
> building then I'd probably still use the lifecycle prefix.
>
At the risk of awakening an old
Unfortunately the original proposal did not really define
tunnel=flooded, nor did it clearly list it as a proposed new tag.
Now this page says: "A long (>100m) tunnel where flowing water or
other fluid prevent humans from safely walking inside"
It needs to be more clear when mappers should use
Joseph Eisenberg writes:
> I agree with "addr:mail=*" as a tag to add to guesthouses, shops,
> farms and other businesses, as a way to send letters and perhaps small
> parcels, which might be delivered to a PO Box or some rural delivery
> system, rather than to the physical address of the shop,
sent from a phone
> On 22. Mar 2020, at 00:46, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> How safe for walking does the tunnel have to be?
waterways often will have quite different levels depending on the atmospheric
conditions in the past days and weeks in the upstream area.
When does it have to be
13 matches
Mail list logo
