Re: [Tagging] Automated edit of image tags suggestion

2020-06-27 Thread European Water Project
Move category links to commons_category=* +1 It might make sense to choose a more generic name like image_category or image_folder, so that any set of images, from any host, related to an osm object can be linked. On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 20:11, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 25.06.20 19:57,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On 6/27/20 09:55, Philip Barnes wrote: > Starbucks in my experience has seating, I am unaware of any which are > takeaway only. There are a couple out here that have outdoor seating only. Even if it was just a kiosk I would still tag amenity=cafe for consistency. -- Shawn K. Quinn

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 09:48 -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > On 6/27/20 09:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > I would be ok with fast food for bubble tea, although typically you > > say “food and drinks”, i.e. calling a place where you can get only > > things to drink and nothing to eat might seem a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 27. Jun 2020, at 16:03, Philip Barnes wrote: > > I would call that a takeaway in everyday language which we map as fast food > in OSM. I would be ok with fast food for bubble tea, although typically you say “food and drinks”, i.e. calling a place where you can get

Re: [Tagging] Automated edit of image tags suggestion

2020-06-27 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Jun 26, 2020, 20:09 by o...@tobias-knerr.de: > * Deprecate wikimedia_commons=* (because it unhelpfully mixes links to > categories, images, and other media types – I agree that's an issue) > * Move category links to commons_category=* > * Move image links to image=* > I strongly dislike idea

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On 6/27/20 09:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I would be ok with fast food for bubble tea, although typically you > say “food and drinks”, i.e. calling a place where you can get only > things to drink and nothing to eat might seem a bit strange? > > The fast food term has also some connotations

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 27. Jun 2020, at 16:59, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > Even if it > was just a kiosk I would still tag amenity=cafe for consistency. if it were just a kiosk you should not tag it as amenity=cafe, exactly for this reason: consistency. Cheers Martin

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Philip Barnes
On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 19:53 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > FWIW, I also believe these are very different from shop=beverages, as > they are selling drinks ready to consume, while shop=beverages is a > kind of shop that sells beverages to take home (while nothing > prevents you from buying a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 16:33 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > > > On 27. Jun 2020, at 16:03, Philip Barnes > > wrote: > > > > I would call that a takeaway in everyday language which we map as > > fast food in OSM. > > I would be ok with fast food for bubble tea,

[Tagging] 回覆﹕ Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread 德泉 談 via Tagging
In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place serving coffee drinks or a place providing seat for the consumer to have something like coffee or donut. Maybe a coffee kiosk is better to map with a kiosk + cuisine=coffee_shop? -Tan 於 星期六, 6月 27, 2020, 11:00 下午,Shawn K. Quinn

Re: [Tagging] 回覆﹕ Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 19:56, Cj Malone < me-osm-tagg...@keepawayfromfire.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 17:15 +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 17:03, 德泉 談 via Tagging > > wrote: > > > > > In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place > > > serving

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 11:10 Martin Koppenhoefer, wrote: > > > On 27. Jun 2020, at 16:59, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: > > > > Even if it [a Starbucks location] > > was just a kiosk I would still tag amenity=cafe for consistency. > > > if it were just a kiosk you should not tag it as amenity=cafe,

Re: [Tagging] 回覆﹕ Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 17:03, 德泉 談 via Tagging wrote: > In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place serving > coffee drinks or a place providing seat for the consumer to have something > like coffee or donut. > In British English, that is exactly the meaning of cafe, > >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 23:07, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > > And then someone comes round and "upgrades tags" to match iD brand presets > :) > Ah. The actual problem (last time I tried upgrading tags with iD) is that it doesn't tell you what it's going to change, it doesn't tell you what it has

Re: [Tagging] 回覆﹕ Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Cj Malone
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 17:15 +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 17:03, 德泉 談 via Tagging > wrote: > > > In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place > > serving coffee drinks > > or > > a place providing seat for the consumer to have > > something like coffee or

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Jarek Piórkowski
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020, 17:52 Paul Allen, wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 22:16, Jarek Piórkowski > wrote: > >> >> I wish you much luck convincing iD not to apply its presets ("upgrade >> tags") for those Starbucks locations that don't have seating. I tried >> insisting on tagging a local

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Don't know if it's only an Aussie thing (yet again! :-)), but we have (at least) one franchise of shops called Boost Juice https://www.boostjuice.com.au/, which only serve varieties of fruit juice & smoothies. Every one of them that I have seen are kiosks inside shopping centres, with no seating

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Paul Allen
On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 22:16, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > > I wish you much luck convincing iD not to apply its presets ("upgrade > tags") for those Starbucks locations that don't have seating. I tried > insisting on tagging a local location's actual posted name ("Starbucks > Coffee") and lost

Re: [Tagging] 回覆﹕ Re: Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 19:54 +0100, Cj Malone wrote: > On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 17:15 +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 17:03, 德泉 談 via Tagging > > wrote: > > > > > In previous discussion we haven’t clarify that “cafe” is a place > > > serving coffee drinks > > > or > > > a place

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=bubble_tea

2020-06-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 27. Jun 2020, at 23:16, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > > I wish you much luck convincing iD not to apply its presets ("upgrade tags") > for those Starbucks locations that don't have seating. we are not discussing iD presets on this list, it is about tagging. Cheers