Re: [Tagging] Benches and hostile architecture

sent from a phone > On 26. Aug 2020, at 00:37, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > If we put access=no on a road, we (usually) don't then show if the road is > physically blocked, or it just has a "No Entry" sign. actually we do, access is about legal access. Cheers Martin

[Tagging] Tagging multiple images on one object

Hi, It seems like there (still) isn't a proper tagging system to put multiple images on one node/way/relation. Having the ability to link other images as well would be useful I think. Either via: `image=url1;url2;url3` or ``` image=url1 image:2=url2 image:3=url3 ``` That later would allow for any

Re: [Tagging] Hands Off !, respect my (our) space

On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 06:38, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Off list. > It looks like you accidentally Bcc'd the list. If not, then Gmail has some serious problems. If not a Gmail problem then I have serious mental problems and think I'm somebody else. > > This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

sent from a phone > On 25. Aug 2020, at 02:07, pangoSE wrote: > > What I mean is that its a bad idea to keep the exact same data in multiple > places and thinking about it postal addresses follows land plots and legal > boundaries and not POIs. it is often not the exact same data.

Re: [Tagging] Benches and hostile architecture

sent from a phone > On 25. Aug 2020, at 11:02, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > > Better. But why not sitting=no, etc it is not clear whether you cannot physically sit there or whether it is legally forbidden Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Benches and hostile architecture

Joseph Eisenberg: > RE: "Would something like hindrance:target = lying_down or hindrance:target = > sitting > be more clear?" I do no like negative formulations. > > While this is somewhat less ambiguous, it looks and sounds quite strange in > English, > and it's quite long. > > How about

Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

Martin Koppenhoefer skrev: (25 augusti 2020 09:18:08 CEST) > > >sent from a phone > >> On 25. Aug 2020, at 02:07, pangoSE wrote: >> >> What I mean is that its a bad idea to keep the exact same data in >multiple places and thinking about it postal addresses follows land >plots and legal

[Tagging] Confusion bicycle_road <> cyclestreet

Hi, I have come across a new (to me) street sign In Italy: https://italy-cycling-guide.info/tips-advice/riding-in-italy/ The road is a one-lane residential road on which bicycles and pedestrians can circulate. I don't know the legal status, however (I am inquiring). In that contest I have noticed

Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

On 24/08/2020 16.25, pangoSE wrote: Martin Koppenhoefer skrev: (24 augusti 2020 02:16:27 CEST) Also useful when the POI is approximately placed (e.g. in a neighbouring building, happens quite often, at least as long as most POIs are not yet mapped) Really? Can you link to an example? I have

Re: [Tagging] Hands Off !, respect my (our) space

On 25/08/2020 06.04, Paul Allen wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 06:38, Warin wrote: Off list. It looks like you accidentally Bcc'd the list. It looks like Warin tried to send it to "80hnhtv4agou---" without noticing that address is a spoofed¹ tagging@OSM. (The reply-to: address should have

[Tagging] Have our tagging voting rules changed recently?

Dear all, I'm the author of the proposal of natural=bare_soil. I didn't expect this modification to the voting process would have (correctly) raised this issue. As you can imagine and guessed, the motivation was to convey negative

Re: [Tagging] Confusion bicycle_road <> cyclestreet

Hi Volker, I tried to clarify the German bit on the cyclestreet page. It wasn't clear enough that the German section on cyclestreet had as point to say: "in Germany cyclestreet=* does not exist, they have bicycle_road instead". These two concepts maybe could have had the same tag from the start

Re: [Tagging] Benches and hostile architecture

On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 19:45, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > On 25. Aug 2020, at 11:02, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > > > > Better. But why not sitting=no, etc > > it is not clear whether you cannot physically sit there or whether it is > legally forbidden > Does it really matter? If we put

Re: [Tagging] Hands Off !, respect my (our) space

On 25/8/20 11:37 pm, Matthew Woehlke wrote: On 25/08/2020 06.04, Paul Allen wrote: On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 06:38, Warin wrote: Off list. It looks like you accidentally Bcc'd the list. It looks like Warin tried to send it to "80hnhtv4agou---" without noticing that address is a spoofed¹