Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Training

2022-09-26 Thread Illia Marchenko
Maybe also amenity=university, but this out of scope of this proposal. вт, 27 сент. 2022 г., 1:27 Graeme Fitzpatrick : > > On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 02:10, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > >> >> What about universities where future sailors/pilots are training

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - pickup

2022-09-26 Thread Martin Fischer
Many retailers let you order online and pick up what you ordered at a store (this is often called click and collect). However such retailers also often provide dedicated pick up points — these are not stores — you cannot buy anything there, you can only pick up products there that you

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble

2022-09-26 Thread Asa Hundert
Nearly two weeks passed since the RfC started. Quite some changes have happened. I’d like to invite a second reading, to help weed out remaining problems. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway=scramble Please comment in the medium of your choice. Thank you in advance

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Training

2022-09-26 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 02:10, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > What about universities where future sailors/pilots are training > (often these are military schools). > They should then be under military=base + base_function=training Thanks Graeme

[Tagging] Are different definitions for same key/value OK? – was: Re: Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?

2022-09-26 Thread Georg
Dear all, stevea wrote Mon Sep 26 2022 01:36:26 GMT+0200 Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination? while the EN wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype does not explicitly exclude it [...] the DE wiki page >>

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble

2022-09-26 Thread Georg
Dear all, Hungerburg wrote Mon Sep 26 2022 22:19:03 GMT+0200 Nearly two weeks passed since the RfC started. Quite some changes have happened. I’d like to invite a second reading, to help weed out remaining problems. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway=scramble "use

Re: [Tagging] Are different definitions for same key/value OK? – was: Re: Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination?

2022-09-26 Thread stevea
On Sep 26, 2022, at 5:14 PM, Georg wrote: > Dear all, > stevea wrote Mon Sep 26 2022 01:36:26 GMT+0200 > Is tracktype=grade1 surface=compacted a valid combination? >>> >>> while the EN wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype >>> does not explicitly exclude it [...] the

Re: [Tagging] incline=up_and_down

2022-09-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
26 wrz 2022, 09:02 od o...@tobias-knerr.de: > On 26.09.22 02:21 Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> But what can be done in cases where there is no real incline but >> path goes through series of up and down hops? >> > > I would intuitively prefer if you put the information about the presence of >

Re: [Tagging] incline=up_and_down

2022-09-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Still, splitting into 60 segments withinaccuracy greater than their lengthseems to not be a good idea. 26 wrz 2022, 07:09 od y...@mailbox.org: > You can't really micromap until you micromap for real ;-) > More seriously, there may be no need to split ways down to the *exact* meter > to give the

Re: [Tagging] incline=up_and_down

2022-09-26 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 26.09.22 02:21 Mateusz Konieczny wrote: But what can be done in cases where there is no real incline but path goes through series of up and down hops? I would intuitively prefer if you put the information about the presence of "hops" into a specialized tag instead of making the value space

Re: [Tagging] incline=up_and_down

2022-09-26 Thread Brad Haack
Any good cycling router needs to use a digital elevation model in it's algorithm, or use elevation tied to the paths somehow (such as with a gpx track).   These odd OSM tags are a sideshow. On 9/26/22 03:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: 26 wrz 2022, 09:02 od o...@tobias-knerr.de:

Re: [Tagging] incline=up_and_down

2022-09-26 Thread martianfreeloader
To me, it seems that the root of the problem is that the mtb:scale:uphill=* key is flawed. Instead, these keys should be name mtb:scale:forward=* and mtb:scale:backward=* . This would make everything unambiguous. And, of course, an additional incline=up/down would be optional but very

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Training

2022-09-26 Thread Illia Marchenko
Training centers (reactivated proposal). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training Please discuss this proposal on its Wiki Talk page. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Training

2022-09-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Probably worth mentioning how places which are officially classified as schools and part of school system would be affected. What about for example https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmusic_school ? What about universities where future sailors/pilots are training (often these are

Re: [Tagging] incline=up_and_down

2022-09-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
Though note that for areas without very good DEM this tags may still provide useful info on short section of way. There is a difference between gradual drop with a normal slope and case where you have bunch of 10 cm high cliffs/kerbs - especially when going uphill. Or 2m long section which is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble

2022-09-26 Thread Asa Hundert
Thank you Alan for the insightful comment. The scrambles I have in mind require little to no generalization step. This is the concept that I was missing to understand some previous comments. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org