[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=hop_garden

Hello, there is a new tagging proposal released for tagging hop gardens http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hop_garden I would like to hear your comments. Thank you. Regards, chrabros ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=hop_garden

] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=hop_garden 2014-03-05 17:02 GMT+01:00 Dalibor Jelínek dali...@dalibor.cz mailto:dali...@dalibor.cz : Hello, there is a new tagging proposal released for tagging hop gardens http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hop_garden I would like

Re: [Tagging] RFC: amenity=locker and amenity=luggage_locker

Well, do we really need two proposala? I do not see any big difference beween them. Dalibor From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:14 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: [Tagging]

Re: [Tagging] amenity=vending_machine and vending=public_transport_plans?

Well, I do not agree. As I understand it “vending” means “selling” and I do not care if it is an item or service beeing sold. I think that you are proposing too strict rules here. Regards, Dalibor From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16,

[Tagging] amenity=vending_machine and vending=public_transport_plans?

Hello, I have tried to document the tag vending=public_transport_plans used as an extension of amenity=vending_machine. This tag is a part of JOSM preset for a long time so it should be documented. But then I have reailized that I maybe do not understand this tag correctly. Do those plans

[Tagging] Proposal for creating working group categories on wiki

Hello, I just want to let you know that I have published the following proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Wiki#Proposal_for_creating_group_ca tegories So if you interested in wiki documentation structure, I would be pleased if you could read it and comment/vote on it. Thank

Re: [Tagging] fiddling with memorial and memorial:type

Hello, if you ask what we prefer then I vote for memorial=* keys. Dalibor > -Original Message- > From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 1:51 AM > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [Tagging] fiddling with memorial and memorial:type >

[Tagging] New access key for Segway needed

Hello, the center of my beautiful city of Prague has been marked in a large scale recently by new road signs stating that use of Segway PT and similar devices is prohibited there. (Search google - images for "zákaz segway".) I guess that some would like to map these. The discussion is here

Re: [Tagging] New access key for Segway needed

, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Tagging] New access key for Segway needed 2017-03-10 5:46 GMT+01:00 Dalibor Jelínek <dali...@dalibor.cz <mailto:dali...@dalibor.cz> >: the center of my beautiful city of Prague has been marked in a large scale

Re: [Tagging] Undiscussed changes for wki pages about access mode "designated".

I slightly modified your statement on highway=path and I think it’s fine. Just to clarify: there is no discussion about access=designated tag. It is clear that this tag makes no sense. The problem is that the page about access tag itself is used to define the values usable for all tags

Re: [Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots

+1 :-) Dalibor > -Original Message- > From: Wolfgang Zenker [mailto:wolfg...@lyxys.ka.sub.org] > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 1:52 AM > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots > > * Shawn K. Quinn

Re: [Tagging] Orientation of an adit?

Hello, +1 for direction tag. Dalibor > -Original Message- > From: Zecke [mailto:zecke@historic.place] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:12 PM > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Orientation of an adit? > > Please note that

Re: [Tagging] Undiscussed changes for wki pages about access mode "designated".

Of course it was there, he just moved it to the lower part of the table. Dalibor (chrabros) > -Original Message- > From: Mariusz [mailto:marius...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 9:09 PM > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > Subject: Re:

Re: [Tagging] Undiscussed changes for wki pages about access mode "designated".

Hello, I fully aggree that this change is undesirable. If you want to use an access type key lets say bicycle=* then you go to this page for documentation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle and you are refered to the Key:access page for values. And there you see that it is

Re: [Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots

Hi, this is not an example of troll tagging. Trolltag is a tag, not a value. landuse=disused is therefore not a troll tag landuse=something + disused=yes here disused=yes woudl be a trolltag as it negates another tag and data consumer must look for this tag to see what is the current status

Re: [Tagging] wikipedia links and copy + paste in tag definitions

Hi Martin, I am sorry but I do not agree with you. I think that the wikipedia link is sometimes essential for non-native speakers and should be included. I do not believe that the defintion of let's say Kremlin will ever change to mean something completely different. IMHO you have chosen a bad