Anthony wikim...@inbox.org writes:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes:
But I've come across situations where the unnamed road is not a
roundabout, though. In one of these cases I used
highway=unclassified, because it was just
Please don't take the following as me arguing with you. I'm just
trying to understand.
No problem - it's a useful discussion and a hard question.
I think the bottom line is that one has to understand the actual
legal/use distinctions made by the experts, and then figure out how much
of
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net writes:
With regard to apartment complexes, condo complexes, mobile home complexes,
and gated single-family-home complexes, I usually tag:
- The ways that cross the boundary line from public street into the complex
are highway=service*** +
Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net writes:
Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net writes:
Roy Wallace wrote:
How should a parking lot be tagged, that is provided for customers,
e.g. at a restaurant, or retail business? It may be signed as such
(e.g. Customers only), or may not.
I would add
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Err no. highway=cycleway indicates that the used way is mainly or
exclusively for bicycles; the route is designated for bicycles
I've been left pondering for a while on how to accurately describe
weird opening hours, things like a church might only operate on the
third sunday of a month, however opening hours tagging currently only
allows for days of the week and hours during the day.
Has anyone else come across
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
On 21 February 2010 22:59, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
END:VCALENDAR
I don't think vcal/ical is suitable, simply because it doesn't merge
the information into a single line/tag...
Agreed; I meant They've already figured out the hard
ℳ∡ℝℸⅈℿ Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2010/4/6 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com
In the US, I am not aware of the concept of a place name for a pair of
houses.
just to make it clear: this is not about a pair of houses but about 1 to
max. 2 households which is generally 1 single
I'm trying to get some input on how to tag a shop selling fish and
seafood from some english speaking users.
I would go for shop=fish. In the US, no one would hear someome saying
they were going to the fish store and say but they sell crustaceans and
they aren't technically fish.
Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com writes:
* Baskin Robbins (fast food?)
This is the missing ice cream shop I think. But if they serve other
food, it's made to order, and they have table service - restaurant.
* Fuddruckers (restaurant or fast food?)
tough call
* Panera Bread (restaurant or
Liz ed...@billiau.net writes:
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Greg Troxel wrote:
cafe - food is made to order, and while fast, it's real food.
Basically my rules are:
snip
so how would you classify the shop which sells magnificent hamburgers,
ordered at the counter, cooked to order, no table
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
On 5 May 2010 11:15, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Would you call dunkin donuts fast food? I do, because I get more of a
megacorp volume feel than a quality food feel there. I think most
I think you are being a tad bias, since small corner
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com writes:
Ok, I'll give up. But I will just point out that, while you insist it
is just asking for trouble, imagine a wiki page that says something
like:
If you're not sure whether the place should be tagged as an
amenity=restaurant, cafe or fast_food, this
Seventy 7 seven...@operamail.com writes:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access says access=permissive means
The owner gives general permission for access.
This doesn't seem consistent with parking restricted to customers. Do
you think this is a problem? I think, if access=* is to mean
Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com writes:
Classifying by runway length does make some sense to me, but I really have
no idea how Mapnik or any other renderer works. Not sure if this would in
fact be easy or not. It also means a renderer needs the runway tagged as a
way or polygon in order
The only problem is that, in this case, it's not a normal-looking
sliproad/ramp, but a surface street that would normally be tagged
highway=residential or unclassified. Here are a few examples:
Pieren pier...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 2:25 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
-1, AFAIK we use soccer in Germany, Italy and probably elsewhere,
while football refers to american football (looking at the icons,
preset icons, etc.).
- -1
AFAIK we
This discussion, although amazingly lengthy is seeming useful. Someone
already explained that much of New England is different from most of the
United States in terms of not having unicorporated areas, and it might
help to explain details.
In Massachusetts, we have counties. Counties don't do
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/20/2010 03:14 PM, Anthony wrote:
Only in those 11 states, right?
I'm surprised admin level isn't already handled defined on a state by
state level.
Why treat it
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
Read the link you provided: In the remaining nine town or township
states (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin), there is no
geographic overlapping of these two
I agree with the notion of not having surprises, but I think going down
the path of judgement about bike lanes being inadequate and not tagging
them is going to lead to a mess. I lean towards saying if there is a
cycle lane painted on the road (and more or less if the road authority
says there
I agree with the notion of not having surprises, but I think going down
the path of judgement about bike lanes being inadequate and not tagging
them is going to lead to a mess. I lean towards saying if there is a
cycle lane painted on the road (and more or less if the road authority
says there
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com writes:
This raises an interesting philosophical question: Does OSM map what
*we* consider to be a bike lane (or a park, or a service road, or a
tertiary highway...) or what *someone else* says it is? The latter
path is sometimes simpler and gives more
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
In the US there are two long federally-maintained roads, the Blue
Ridge Parkway and Natchez Trace Parkway, that were built for the sole
purpose of sightseeing. Since they are surrounded by a narrow strip of
parkland, access is only allowed at
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On 2/24/2011 8:18 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
On the other hand, some apparently non-local user has messed up tagging
of Route 2 near Boston/Cambridge (from alewife to the science museum)
and made them trunk when they obviously aren't (to anyone who has
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On 7/29/2011 7:21 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I think the underlying problem is that there's a big gap between
tertiary, which should be a road that really is used to go somewhere and
residential, which more or less means a road that you wouldn't care
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On 8/31/2011 8:35 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I thought the issue was that there are two distinct concepts:
boundaries, where there is some legal distinction and a precise edge
place names, which have more or less indistinct boundaries
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2011/8/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
place names, which have more or less indistinct boundaries.
just because they have no legal status does not mean there aren't
distinct limits. Usually / often there are. There can be natural
limits
I've often been confused by the suburb tag and maybe someone can clear it
up for me.
The tags place=city, place=town, place=village, and place=hamlet are
mutually exclusive; if a spot is in a place=village, then it's not in an
adjacent place=town. It seems to be that place=suburb is
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
I'd like to propose shop=pastry. (Currently there are 13 of these
according to taginfo)
There is some recommendations for similar features
1.
amenity=cafe
cuisine=cake
and
2.
shop=confectionery
I interpret the first as a place to
1) stars=4 What system does this refer to? Is this according to
Hotelstars Union? If I see this right, Belgium isn't part of this
union.
I think the stars notion should be removed from OSM. It's either
confused, or some particular rating body's opinion, and neither of those
seem
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On 1/13/2012 7:17 AM, SomeoneElse wrote:
When I was adding this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/52984927
which is something that you do need an actual permit to access (on a
horse) I left the horse access as permissive but added a note
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net writes:
This is the standard for FCC (communications) and FAA (airspace) in
the US. Well, close at least - elevations are generally above mean
sea level - I don't know how that relates to the WGS84/GPS and/or
survey elevation but I'd expect them to be
I favor railway=abandoned and then if necessary specialize from there.
The point about data consumers not knowing about new tags and therefore
building a semantic hierarchy to optimize for sensible behavior is a
strong one.
You probably already know this, but: in OSM railway=abandoned is what we
Pieren pier...@gmail.com writes:
tourism=information
information=trail_blaze
hiking=yes
operator=
support=tree|pole|rock
description=
That seems reasonable. But, there are various kinds of markers for
trails I have encountered, and some of them would not necessarily be
called blazes.
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On the other hand, private says Only with permission of the owner on
an individual basis. But the owner is the homeowners association, and
the individual residents can allow people in.
That's creating nits where they don't even exist! Owner is a
Pieren pier...@gmail.com writes:
All in title (question seen on our local forum)
amenity=restaurant + access=private ?
While I understand the notion of access=private, my reaction is that the
fundamental concept of restaurant is that it is open to the public, and
a private dining facility
Werner Poppele popp...@hm.edu writes:
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged
landuse=trailer_park. Is that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag
tourism=camp_site seems to be not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
landuse=trailer_park 8
amenity=trailer_park 23
tourism=camp_site
In built-up areas, almost all land is used.
straightfoward; but in the countryside houses often have large grounds
attached to them, and even fields. In particular there are quite a few
I think the question is if the lot that the house is on (assuming lots
in England work like lots in the
Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com writes:
http://www.ahlzen.com/misc/trailmarker.jpg
I saw some like that in Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge (22, 23,
etc.). But that it is 'around here' relative to you.
information=guidepost
name=... or ref=...
seems reasonable. It would be nice,
Reading over your comments about turn restrictions and the NY state
code, I feel like we will end up with tortuous reasoning and miss the
mark. Stepping way back and ignoring legal details, it seems like we
need a schema to express what kinds of people/vehicles/etc. may do what,
and a way to use
admin boundary levels 9 10 are unused in the US.
i see some usage of level 9 for fire district boundaries in the US.
I don't think we should use 9/10 for fire/school/etc. Those are not
necessarily subsets of admin_level 8. If a state has a formal notion of
something less than town
I have been using mkgmap for about 3 years. I am not clear on it doing
turn restrictions, because the garmin format is reverse-engineered, and
the new version not understood. I am unaware of any other GPSr units
being capable of being translated to.
It's certainly possible to have a style file
Chris Baines cbain...@gmail.com writes:
1: http://www.rhok.org/problems/granular-health-map
2: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Catchment
The problem with representing catchment areas in OSM is that it rapidly
gets into the one database, one man's treasure, another's junk
Dave Sutter sut...@intransix.com writes:
This may be a radical suggestion for OSM but I think POIs should be
removed from the map database and put in an external database. Each
POI should have an address and the address is used to match the POI to
the map.
This can also be extended to ref
Svavar Kjarrval sva...@kjarrval.is writes:
Hi.
How does one tag buildings which are both commercial and residential?
There are two main situations I'm thinking of:
1) The part which is residential is besides the part which is
commercial, but they do have the same housenumber. Do I separate
Balgofil balgo...@gmx.net writes:
1. Radfahrstreifen: cycle lanes which are mandatory indicated by a
sign and a solid lane (cycleway=lane)
2. Schutzstreifen cycle lanes with dashed lines not so wide as a
Radfahrstreifen and therefore only advisory and no sign (cycleway=?)
I think the
closed_until is overengineered* and does not match my local reality.
When a restaurant closes, it often posts closed for renovations.
Sometimes they open again, sometimes they don't.
So I think if it's a 2-week advertised window, ignore it or perhaps use
the tag. But if there's no firm,
Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com writes:
Removing things is not such a good idea when you have
people downloading offline data and use data that is 6 months to a
year of of date,
I don't think we should optimize the database for bugs in people's
processing pipelines. I have not encountered
My standard plea: we are building a taxonomy of the world, and our
tagging scheme should be jointly exhaustive and mutually exclusive, when
that makes sense.
For marking the area of land used by the resort area (including
buffers), I think a landuse= value is appropriate. It isn't
residential,
I don't know what those mean, but there are two separate concepts being
blurred:
A) There used to be a (logical) railway station at a site. This
really doesn't have anything to do with buildings. Subclasses
could be if the station is no longer in use but the railway is
active,
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
can mean two legally different things:
out of service
abandoned (tracks present)
Sorry, I didn't explain these:
out of service means the railroad chooses not to run trains. But
they might change their mind.
abandonment is a big legal step
fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com writes:
I was trying to get a common tower preset working for JOSM [1], when I
started reading about the terms on wikipedia (english).
As I am not a native speaker, I like to ask natives about there
thoughts but as far as I understood it.
What we call
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Jonathan Bennett jonobenn...@gmail.com
wrote:
There was this discussion on talk-gb recently:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2013-January/014376.html
Yeah, that's actually what prompted this
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/2/7 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
... because in the present, railway=station means the
site and we don't really denote the building. In the historic:,
railway=station is the building and railway=station_site is the place.
-1, better
[First, I understand what you mean, and what you're trying to do. My
town certainly has places like this for medevac helicopters.]
I think this information clearly does belong in OSM. It's a fact about
the real world, and it's easy to verify.
But, I don't think they are helipads.
It might be
Pieren pier...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de
wrote:
Could it be stored inside the emergency key?
so leave away the aeroway and store as emergency=helipad?
Since it is informal and applies to level grassy areas, what will
be
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/3/30 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
Something unverifiable on the ground. What you describe is just a contract
between an organization and a landowner.
well, a contract is in many circumstances verifiable. You could also see an
actual
Alexander Jones happy5...@gmail.com writes:
What is the proper way to tag places that make and sell juice and fruit
smoothies? Examples in the U.S. include Jamba Juice and Orange Julius.
I could call them amenity=cafe cuisine=juice, because they are not so
different from a coffeeshop, except
Brian Wolford // HOT brian.wolf...@hotosm.org writes:
1 http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/name=Jamba%20Juice
Right now there is a minor majority given to amenity=fast_food over cafe
for the worlds Jamba Juices.
Is the argument out there that juice and smoothies should be considered
hannes.janet...@gmail.com hannes.janet...@googlemail.com writes:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/j3d/edits
have you tried to contact him? AFAIK these mechanical edits haven't been
done following the
Brian Wolford // HOT brian.wolf...@hotosm.org writes:
I often differentiate fast_food as counter service and restaurant as sit
down with a menu and order from a waiter service.
I basically agree, but there's also an intermediate order at counter,
have someone bring it to you. But the key
Tac Tacelosky tac...@gmail.com writes:
Yeah, tag keys should follow that, but not key values. I'm sure there
are values with single and double quotes, commas and semi-colons.
Sorry, I meant tag values that are essentially keywords, such as
amenity=fast_food. Basically the values for amenity
fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com writes:
When was landuse=reservoir [1] deprecated ?
There was only little discussion on tagging@ about water=* [2][3]. Now
we have to different uses which do not fit together (eg,
water=lake;intermittent ?).
Anyway landuse=reservoir was never deprecated and
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/6/6 Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com
We have gotten several notes reported from craigslist users saying this
lake is missing from the map but I think it turns out that craigslist is
not rendering landuse=reservoir so unless lakes have
Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de writes:
Because the Water details proposal¹ included the deprecation. It was
even mentioned on this list that the proposal included deprecation -
although learning which tags exactly were proposed for deprecation
required clicking the wiki link iirc. Still,
fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com writes:
But how to we proceed ?
If we agree that landuse=reservoir should be used for the whole area. Do
we need a temporary tag or adding water=reservoir to all of them?
Only simple case are where a water=reservoir is already tagged (either
on the same
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
I'd rather prefer to have the water protection as a different tag then
landuse, something like protected_area, because my guess is that reservoir
protection is not necessarily the only or main landuse of any such area
with obligations to
fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com writes:
Having been away from this for a bit, I would propose:
Add a landuse=reservoir_protection (or some other name, not in use) to
be for the landuse of a parcel that is used for containing a reservoir
and protection zones. (I have an
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
Again, I'm still not hearing a suggestion that would keep this valuable
information in OSM, or a compelling reason not to keep it.
It's not clear that it's valuable. If you want to propose a scheme for
desired corridors by only-slightly-authoritative
Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com writes:
I am sure this has been asked many times before:
How do I tag correctly a path/track/road that bears the label access at
your own risk
Don't use the access tag :-) That's about right of access, and that
sort of sign is usually either:
a real
John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com writes:
On the other hand, a road labeled as use at your own risk may well
be one that is not currently being maintained, meaning that you have
increased odds of finding it impassable due to washouts, landslides,
and the like. I have seen some one-lane
Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com writes:
I suppose it could be done programmatically. It is clear which node
is the first one, so it could be rendered differently, with extra
detail extracted from the tags on the track itself. However,
explicit is better than implicit, so I'd like to
Trailheads are not necessarily start/end or associated with a particular
trail. It's more like a train station, a place you go to change from
one transport mode to another, from which perhaps multiple trails can be
accessed.
pgpv5kHKK4rzr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I don't think the distinction in their governance is important for a
map. There's a slippery slope somewhere where osm becomes wikipedia.
What's important is that there's a hardware store, and the name it is
known by.
I would use franchise. If you want to make up weak_franchise for
stores that
amrit karmacharya amrit...@gmail.com writes:
OSMNepal community is standardizing the administrative boundary tags. We
have the following heirarchy.
one way is to give them level from 2-7 according to heirarchy. Would this
be an appropriate tagging scheme?
As Frederik points out,
Jonathan Bennett jonobenn...@gmail.com writes:
A plot is the individual parcel of land within and allotment site that
is let (rented, hired, or other synonym) to one tenant.
No argument with the reality, but note that in the US parcel means an
area of land that is delineated by a deed (at the
Does social market make sense to native English speakers?
No. I (US native, northeast) have no idea what that means.
We have things called food pantry, which is a charity; people donate
food (or money, which the organization use to buy low-cost food from
supermarkets). People who don't have
Gilbert Hangartner kuessemondtaegl...@gmail.com writes:
I wrote a proposal to correctly tag Crèches or Childcare-centres
or Daycare-centrers or Kindertagesstätte. Thank you in advance for
your comments and thoughts.
My reaction on seeing the subject was that creches are not amenities,
but
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2013/11/17 The definition given for the landuse-polygon seems too
restrictive, I'd
ditch the second part are constructed up to a boundary or barrier
separating this land from private property.
(Because there doesn't have to be private
cracklinrain cra_klinr...@gmx.de writes:
German roads are built similar. But usually this is not dependent on
stuff like property. Usually land owners are forced to fit onto the
local prescriptions. So maybe a ditch is part of the property of a
private person, but part of the street.
Jonathan bigfatfro...@gmail.com writes:
Very important that we can mark roads that are officially designated
as unsuitable for certain vehicles. Don't see a problem with this use
of this tag?
Sure, but designated as unsuitable is not about right of access; it's a
different kind of
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net writes:
dieterdreist wrote:
this might depend on the circumstances/jurisdiction. Maybe it would
already put you legally in a bad situation if you drove your hgv into
that road with the sign suggesting you don't do so, and something
(i.e. damage)
SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk writes:
Some (but very few) BOATs near me say service road to you when you
look at them; most just say track or even bridleway. The only
unclassified ones I can find are as a result of some newbie's*
mapping and probably could benefit from a resurvey
Sure, I realize I can (with enough spare time) render what I want. The
mkgmap style I have does in fact mark dirt roads (by abusing track, as
you suggest, which needs fixing), and I'll get around to making osmand
show them too.
My point was that for almost all map users (in cars or road bikes),
Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl writes:
On 20 August 2014 18:45, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Wood: Woodland with no forestry
Forest: Managed woodland or woodland plantation.
How do you define forestry or 'managing' forests?
Most forests in the Netherlands are
I don't think we should have tags for particular proprietary services.
Instead, a URL to various pages can be given in the url tag, with ; if
necessary.
pgpejuxb2fe5M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org wrote:
One open question for me, which we I would appreciate guidance on, is
whether or not to import address points for each unit number in a building,
where we have them. Right
I'm in favor of two nodes/elements, one for gas and one for the shop.
The main reason is that while designign complicated tagging seems to be
what people do, tagging designs should be done from the point of view of
those writing code to consume the database and do something useful. Two
nodes
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
the common rule of thumb is counter service vs. table service. even
so, there are occasional grey areas (e.g., at Hardees you order at
the counter but they deliver to your table, still fast food in my book.)
and it produces slightly quirky
johnw jo...@mac.com writes:
1) there are large open concrete areas for pedestrians, but there are also
covered walkways through them as well.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/36.38380/139.07281
I mapped the open sections as highway=pedestrian+area=yes, while I
traced the
johnw jo...@mac.com writes:
perhaps use the =destination tag instead of =private on the road you are
supposed to use.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
I agree. There's also access=customers that I use for parking lots.
Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com writes:
As I said earlier, I am also a hobby photographer. The light levels we are
talking about are anyway in a range that old-fashioned hand-held light
meters are useless. Then it's the question of the different metering
Many current photo meters will read
Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com writes:
Went out last night .. light level pointing up to street light was 0.0
lux... so less than 0.1 lux. Meaning I could not measure it this
way. I'll think about it. A talk to an expert might be worth while?
That doesn't make sense. I would expect several
Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de writes:
Am 18.01.2015 um 07:14 schrieb John F. Eldredge:
You could use a light meter to measure how bright the light is. That
isn't the only factor in the suitability of the lighting, but it is
objective.
... provided that you measure on a dark night
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com writes:
Have a peek here to see what residential power lines might look like, if
added to the database:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/37.64529/-118.97450
A few thoughts:
There's a big difference between transmission and distribution.
Those may
Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us writes:
The trailhead proposal is long overdue. They are common around areas I've
lived in the US. They usually have limited parking, signage, sometimes a
place to pay, and some even have permanent or portable restrooms. Thanks
for creating the proposal.
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
Hi,
On 06/03/2015 05:59 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
I am encountering the tags SHAPE_Leng, SHAPE_Area, GIS_ACRES on US
National Forests. If I am making other edits to the OSM element in
question, can these be deleted? Converted to some other tag?
Daniel Koć dan...@xn--ko-wla.pl writes:
1. First is rather easy - there is fenced area with a few big
apartment houses. You can enter only if you have a key or somebody
open it. Should the highways inside be tagged with access=private?
It's like few hundred people inside, so I just want to
Ilpo Järvinen ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi writes:
You seem to admit that there's need for some hierarchy, however, on the
same time you seem to oppose the idea that such hierarcy would exists
based on physical properties (man-made vs informal). I find it strange
since it shouldn't be that
1 - 100 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
