Re: [Tagging] Route members: ordered or not

bus route relations can get very complexe if they are not ordered. I order them to make sure I haven't missed anything On Thu, May 3, 2018, 11:28 AM Yves, wrote: > Un-ordered route members make it very hard to detect a broken route. > Best practice : > 1. If you edit a route,

Re: [Tagging] When was the deprecation of location=kiosk for power=substation discussed?

@Peter, Same here in Canada. No one calls a substation a kiosk here On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 6:16 AM Peter Elderson, wrote: > Looks like it's australian, to call a power substation a power kiosk. It > converts the high voltage to low voltage and distributes power to >

[Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers?

https://i.imgur.com/eigT5hX_d.jpg?maxwidth=640=thumb=medium How should this be tagged in housenumber? Using unicode ( ½ ) or ASCII( 1/2 )? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers?

uld be 1/8 for you? Or 8/8? Does unicode even have 8/8? I haven't > been able to find a decisive answer. > -- Původní e-mail -- > Od: James <james2...@gmail.com> > Komu: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Datum: 12

Re: [Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers?

ca/maps/search/40%C2%BD+Rue+de+Carillon,+Gatineau,+QC+J8X+2N7,+Canada/@45.4284038,-75.7238724,19z/data=!3m1!4b1 > > So for the other project, we had to strip out the numerical modifiers (½, > bis ...) before trying to geocode. We could have tried to interpolate but > that would hav

Re: [Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers?

it is indeed an upstaires. 40 and 40a are the units downstaires. No 40a ½ On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 5:48 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick, <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 March 2018 at 21:22, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> in case it wasnt bad enough, there's 40A to the

Re: [Tagging] Tagging fraction house numbers?

penstreetmap.org/search?q=%C2%BD#values It's used very >> few times (~200) and many are by the same user, which seems like more >> argument against using UTF-8. >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:17 AM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> so f

Re: [Tagging] Identifying language regions

Martin that reminds me of what someone did in Northern Canada: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/107355436#map=14/68.7653/-81.2156 Inuktitut and English, despite Inuktitut not really being used(it's a way to write what they speak invented by European settlers/priests), problem is it's only for

Re: [Tagging] Still RFC — Drop stop positions and platforms

on top of that documentation is not clear atleast when I was trying to learn how to tag bus routes. The only way I understood was a google hangout video on youtube(OSM US?) showing how they tagged it. Add relations and direction of ways (forwards, backwards) and it's a very time consuming task to

[Tagging] Shop=tailor vs craft=tailor

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3126#issuecomment-373963431 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dtailor 10 000 uses vs https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/craft=tailor#overview 5000 Should we support both or just one(if so which?)

Re: [Tagging] Shop=tailor vs craft=tailor

i see craft=* as * skill set or prefession services are offered here. On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 3:17 PM Martin Koppenhoefer, wrote: > > > 2018-03-18 11:22 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > >> So if we tag a building "craft=tailoring" then that says "tailoring

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

well shop=cannabis is going to be needed in Canada in a couple months as it's going to become legal nation wide with goverment run shops July 1st. The preposal looks good On Fri, Mar 16, 2018, 8:22 PM Michael Patrick, wrote: > Here, Cliff :-) > ( from

[Tagging] Bus routes tagging question

For bus routes I understand the whole concept of route and route_master and you map multiple routes into route_master if there is a fork in the route. My question is say the bus schedule at one specific time of day(school morning) has one stop it uses only once a day, but does not deviate from

Re: [Tagging] Bus routes tagging question

2019, 12:13 James wrote: > >> For bus routes I understand the whole concept of route and route_master >> and you map multiple routes into route_master if there is a fork in the >> route. >> >> My question is say the bus schedule at one specific time of day(school >

Re: [Tagging] Bus Routes PTv2

>> >> على ٢٦‏/٩‏/٢٠١٩ ‫١:٣٦ م، كتب James: >> > If you have a bus route that doubles back on itself, do you have to >> > add the way twice to the relation or add it once and let the router >> > figure out that it's already in the relation? >> >> I add

[Tagging] Bus Routes PTv2

If you have a bus route that doubles back on itself, do you have to add the way twice to the relation or add it once and let the router figure out that it's already in the relation? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] bicycle=no

Hi all, Because we were having *so* much fun repeating the footway-cycleway-path debate again, here's another related question: what does bicycle=no actually mean, no bicycles or no cycling? Last night I asked on IRC whether anyone know how to tag a Cyclists must dismount sign, and would

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

On 06/12/2009, at 5:17 PM, John Smith wrote: 2009/12/6 James Livingston doc...@mac.com: I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For example I would guess that where horse=no is used, you

Re: [Tagging] bicycle=no

On 09/12/2009, at 3:30 AM, Mike Harris wrote: Personally - and I'm probably wrong! - I had always thought that foot / bicycle = yes / no etc. did not say anything one way or the other about formal legal status (hence leaving this to designation= ) but merely whether the evidence on the

Re: [Tagging] Tagging highway=cycleway without explicit knowledge of the law?

On 11/12/2009, at 5:44 PM, Roy Wallace wrote: The current wiki definition of highway=cycleway is mainly or exclusively for bicycles. This I cannot be sure of from the aerial imagery, nor can I of anything to do with the law. What to do... Ah, the curse of NearMap being too good. The current

Re: [Tagging] Bridges and layers

personally). -- James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] tag groupings

=roundabout could be tagged with implies=oneway=yes. -- James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Non Proposed Features

On 17/08/2010, at 2:09 AM, Matthias Meißer wrote: Yes soft moderation by the community but therefore the community needs some central space and some guidelines. You already see the lack of voters, just cause it's to decentral communication atm. It's also because some people (myself included)

Re: [Tagging] sneaking in tags in the wiki

://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:type%3Dtraffic_control -- James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Combo Weight Bridges

in the 2009 MUTCD, or even the 2003 one. So, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Combo Weight Bridges

the normal limit now and wait for some more consensus on how to tag the second weight later if I wanted to. -- James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency Traffic Signals

I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are typically found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Emergency_Traffic_Signals -- James

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Emergency Traffic Signals

On 13 January 2011 16:10, Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org wrote: On 01/12/2011 11:33 PM, James Mast wrote: I've created a proposal for Emergency Traffic Signals, which are typically found in front of fire stations and highway tunnels at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features

Re: [Tagging] Counterflow Lanes

Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the following: lanes=3 lanes:counterflow=center That should work for now. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24873632 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Counterflow Lanes

...@gmail.com To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] Counterflow Lanes On 2/18/2011 5:00 AM, James Mast wrote: Alright, I've tagged the roadway that I was asking this about with the following: lanes=3 lanes:counterflow=center I believe the word is contraflow

Re: [Tagging] Counterflow Lanes

I've personally heard Contraflow mentioned for the switchover's some DOT's have on Interstates for Hurricane (or other) evacuations in the press. I know I-95 in Georgia happens to have two such crossovers, but they don't specifically say contraflow on the signs. Here are links to how they do

Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a highway that isn't divided

on a highway that isn't divided On 4/13/2011 1:45 AM, James Mast wrote: So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like this? Here's my example: Here in Pittsburgh, when you're coming off I-579 going towards the South Hills across the Liberty Bridge, you

Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a highway that isn't divided

To: tagging@openstreetmap.org CC: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com On 13 April 2011 17:06, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote: Not the same situation here NE2. There are no traffic lights at all installed in either place for the inbound direction, just outbound. Is the 2 directions

Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a highway that isn't divided

...@ursamundi.org Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:11:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [Tagging] Traffic Lights, but only for one direction on a highway that isn't divided On 04/13/2011 12:45 AM, James Mast wrote: So does anybody have any suggestions on how to deal with something like this? Here's my example: I'm pretty

[Tagging] Tagging HOV lanes that have strict times (and are completely separate from main highway)

I was just about to create some new relations for the I-279/I-579 HOV lanes to reflect the times that they are open and closed. http://www.dot.state.pa.us/penndot/districts/district11.nsf/traffic_HOV_hours?OpenForm That shows the current times when they are open and when Outbound is

[Tagging] Tagging split exit ramps

wondering how the split exit numbers would be rendered, don't worry, there will be an example in the proposal if you guys think this is a good idea to go ahead with. -- James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging HOV lanes that have strict times (and are completely separate from main highway)

when they are open. Motorcycles are except of the HOV restrictions when they are active, so how would you suggest I tweak the relations to show this properly? Thanks. - James From: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:41:35 -0400 Subject

Re: [Tagging] Tagging split exit ramps

Well, I'm working up an official proposal for this right now. Will updating this thread and also send out a RFC once it's done. ;) -- James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=motorway_junction Tagging Extension

motorway when both are tagged as motorways (instead of motorway and motorway_link). You can see the proposal here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorway_junction_Extension -- James (rickmastfan67

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=motorway_junction Tagging Extension

info like brown or smaller green signs here [like this: http://goo.gl/maps/220D - #5C now #69C (I-376) and #7A now #1B] in the USA). I hope I have answered your question fully. If not, please let me know. -- James To: tagging@openstreetmap.org From: da...@debian.org Date: Sun, 22 May 2011

[Tagging] maxheight - Feet Inches

(~14'-8) overpasses that cross over it in Oak Hill that I noticed on a recent trip. So, if there is a general consensus on which way to tag it, I'll also update the wiki to put in an example to *help* prevent having 4+ different ways to show the same info. -- James

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

All I know is that service=drive-through was rendered already in Mapnik while service=drive_through is not. Look here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.525952lon=-80.006203zoom=18layers=M I had originally tagged the Drive Thru's for Taco Bell and Arby's here as service=drive-through

Re: [Tagging] service=drive-through or drive_through?

on this on the Wiki talk page so we will not need to have a discussion about this ever again. :) -- James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] rest_area and service road

Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging This is what I do as well. I consider them as motorway_link's till they either the ramp splits for trucks and cars OR the parking lane starts (when it isn't a split rest area). -- James

Re: [Tagging] Remove odbl tags?

I would love to see a bot run after the database officially was declared odbl to delete them and the odbl:note tags. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Turn Restrictions

for the one direction that the sign says you can't go. -James (Here's the link to the page again if you want quick access to it: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction ) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link

://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging I could revive that if everybody thought it was a good idea since I came up with it. --James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Stop sign?

of Downtown Pittsburgh). They are the only known examples I can think of in this area that doesn't have a divider separating the traffic. -James [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/684666723[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/684666821 - StreetView so you can see what I'm talking

Re: [Tagging] exit_to on motorway_junction

really commented about here on the Tagging list or on the Wiki page for it.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorway_junction_Extension --James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Proposed relation give_way

Why wouldn't something like a node tagged highway:forward=give_way work? -James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Micro mapping traffic signals

would be needed as we don't want to penaltize the Inbound traffic since they never have to stop for a traffic light in both of those places. -James [1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/684666723 [2] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/684666821 [3] - http://goo.gl/maps/E9gD8

Re: [Tagging] telephone lines (and marking other things we don't map)

But what if the pole has both telephone and power on it? ;) That's what's common here in my neighborhood. I can look out my front door and see a pole with both of them using it. -James Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:05:38 +0200 From: francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu To: tagging

Re: [Tagging] Center Turn Lane Tagging?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:centre_turn_lane ? This is what I've been using. -James Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 18:11:11 -0500 From: ba...@ursamundi.org To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] Center Turn Lane Tagging? lanes:both_ways=1turn:lanes:both_ways=left On Sat

Re: [Tagging] Center Turn Lane Tagging?

understand that needs to be done sometimes. And another note here, I don't think you should really be attacking people here on-list when they can't defend themselves, Paul. It just isn't right and not fair. -James Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 01:13:18 -0500 From: ba...@ursamundi.org To: tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tram tracks running in a road

streetcar tracks from when that line was decommissioned in the 1980's still embedded in it, and is a brick road to boot. I don't think we have any other examples like that, but I haven't tried to do any research on all the old streetcar routes from before I was born here in Pittsburgh. -James

Re: [Tagging] Maxspeed

the ramp speed (if that option is turned on). -James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] To mark as covered, or to not mark as covered?

know if he fully read the wiki page or not. Any help/opinions on this subject would be greatly appreciated. -James ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

Re: [Tagging] Turn Lane Tagging?

I honestly think Mapbox needs to stop immediately editing ways that they think are invalid. I've seen several ways that I've work hard on, know are valid, and are being damaged by edits. The 'NONE' tag in turn lanes is COMPLETELY VALID

Re: [Tagging] Wharf

Apologies but I've never come across the term mole, the equivalent English article on the Wikipedia for the German article Mole and the French article Brise-lames is the article Breakwater which has a tag page on the openstreetmap wiki[1] is a approved proposal and seems to have almost 14000 ways,

Re: [Tagging] Unsigned portions of signed routes

Well, here's an example of how I dealt with US-19 Truck over here in Pittsburgh were it isn't signed on I-279 or I-376 except inside of the I-376 exit 69 mess on the south side of the Fort Pitt Tunnels. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/571349 (signed)