it can't be helped that several relations are needed?
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
In Ghent (Belgium) I find the following in the name tags:
Henri Farmanstraat ((Luchthavenpionier, 1874-1958))
Vincent Evrardlaan ((Oud burgemeester van Gentbrugge, 1896-1995))
Guido Gezelle straat ((Dichter, 1830-1899))
Interesting information, but technically not really part of the name of the
Sounds good to me.
Polyglot
2011/5/23 Andrew Chadwick (lists) a.t.chadwick+li...@gmail.com
I'm suggesting that we remove the language on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden which recommends
leisure=garden for tagging private residential gardens. The talk page
entry is at
I'm translating a message from talk-fr:
After having added the emergency escape lanes in France (or at least a good
part of them) on this page:
http://routes.wikia.com/wiki/Utilisateur:Sylvain_59/test4
which is my user page, I wanted to reuse this information and add to
openstreetmap.
I
the first thing the 1,5 year old noticed. Does it make sense to
mention them?
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
the suggestion like that, I thought
he wanted pictures for the wiki. So I'll try to take some better ones,
than the ones I have now, when I get back there.
Jo
2011/11/21 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2011/11/20 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
On 11/13/2011 02:15 AM, Jo wrote
bakker' (everything is prepared
in-house) en 'koude' bakker. The products are prepared either in another
'warme bakker' or industrially.
Jo
2011/11/27 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
I'd like to propose shop=pastry. (Currently there are 13
state=alternate is used in Belgium and The Netherlands for the cycle and
hiking node networks with numbered nodes. It means that there are 2 routes
connecting 2 numbered nodes. A 'default'/'preferred'/'normal' one and an
alternative one. (shortcut, more pittoresque). This implies that 2 route
to keep those up to date anyway.
What is missing at the moment, is a deep link to the website of Toerisme
Vlaanderen, where interested people can consult all the information as well.
When I have those, should I use
website:ToerismeVlaanderen=
for that?
Jo
when the entry is no/false. But if
they are available, on site or off site, is it OK to mention them?
Jo
2011/12/5 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Jo,
please stop right there and take a deep breath.
On 12/05/2011 12:45 PM, Jo wrote:
Toerisme Vlaanderen wants to share its databases
2011/12/6 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
2011/12/5 Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
2011/12/5 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
7) Instead of hotel:garden = yes it might be more useful to
actually draw the garden (leisure=garden, garden:style=,
garden:type=hotel or similar
You mean that spot where the bus can get out of the way of the other
traffic to load/unload passengers?
We have many of them here. I don't tend to tag the specifically, they look
a bit like a rather short extra lane...
Jo
2011/12/6 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
Is there a way to tag
, playground...
Why not for hotels ?
With a multipolygon or with a site relation? Can you show me a few examples
of schools mapped this way?
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi Michael,
It would really help if you had added a link to this proposal. I look at
the recent changes on the wiki, but didn't see anything relevant.
Polyglot
2011/12/20 Michael Wickert michael.wick...@googlemail.com
Dear Sir or Madam,
please would you be so kind to comment my Proposal for
On the one hand I wouldn't bother tagging them, but for the ones that you
did tag, I think you should go back and tag them private. The tennis courts
too.
Every time I see solar panels shining on Bing, my fingers itch to tag them
as power plants, but I don't think it makes a lot of sense to do
For what it's worth. When I start rendering/printing maps based on OSM, I
think it's extremely ugly if the landuse is not 'connected' to the roads,
i.e. that the landuse uses separate parallel ways with a small space in
between for its definition.
I also prefer to create landuses as big as
2012/1/22 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
On 17/01/2012 15:41, Jo wrote:
For what it's worth. When I start rendering/printing maps based on OSM, I
think it's extremely ugly if the landuse is not 'connected' to the roads,
i.e. that the landuse uses separate parallel ways with a small space
there are different types of errors and you focus on one only. I am not
going to argue with examples or explanations. If you don't want to see it
you won't see it.
I'll try to give another example, which may or may not help Pawel to see
what you mean:
I'm gathering information about bus
For which purpose would the two highways be reassembled?
Split highways may be reassembled when you're not interested in the
attributes that do change between them. For example when you want to
reassemble the portions of the same road with the same class and name
together but aren't
The dye added is not the common denominator. We need the British term
for the tax break status of it.
2012/11/12 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
I was thinking about organising fuel nodes in my country, and that requires
more tags than the wiki has.
First, I think we have no tags for a fuel
What you really want to do is apply the speed limits to the OSM ways:
maxspeed=30
source:maxspeed=zone30.
But the source file has nodes.
Is there a way to feed all these nodes into Openstreetbugs automatically
and then ask the Belgian population to fix those 'bugs'/'improvement
requests' in
I'm mapping them as highway=stop as a node of the way, just before where it
crosses the main road. I would map a traffic_sign=stop as a node next to
the road. But that just makes it harder to work with the data, so I prefer
the first approach.
What I never do anymore is to tag the node of the
. So it's not the same situation.
It also depends on the quality of the Bing imagery. It has now become
possible to indicate where highway=give_way applies for many places in
Europe.
Polyglot
2012/11/21 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote
anyone see a way on how to achieve this?
Да. Jo the Polyglot, winfi...@gmail.com as he wrote this afternoon
On 2012-11-21 16:53, Jo wrote :
I may have a way to upload them to OSB. The API is indeed quite
accessible. In order to take out the ones that are already in the OSM data,
I can
I wrote a Python script to upload them to Openstreetbugs. Now I'm looking
at OSMOSE and I noticed it also has a category for Openstreetbugs. I think
it still needs to be synchronized, as I see only the bugs that were already
present yesterday. If people prefer to use OSMOSE, this is certainly
important than the other.
Jo
2012/11/23 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I (would) do this mostly for consistency. I have to admit I never HAD to
do it, most stop signs in Belgium are used for their intended purpose: give
priority to the main road, not inhibit
What I'm doing right now is tag the roads inside this zone with
maxspeed=50 and
source:maxspeed=city_limit.
This doesn't fit entirely, as it doesn't only influence maxspeed. Maybe
adding a tag city_limit=yes would be more appropriate?
Besides there is a conflict when inside those city limits
I'm a bit unhappy with the term urban instead of built-up or
city_limit/city_limits. But it's better than source:maxspeed=city_limits,
so I'll start using it.
Hopefully it gets out of the proposed state one day, it was proposed in
2009
Jo
2012/11/23 Kytömaa Lauri lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi
zone:traffic=**:rural
zone:traffic=**:urban
source:maxspeed=zone30
highway=living_street
have an effect on other traffic rules as well, so it's important to know
that's the 'regime' the street is under.
As a data consumer I also prefer to have the maxspeed be tagged explicitly.
That's true for
2012/11/30 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
wrote:
Are we sure that those relations provide more information than they
prevent to be provided?
In the example you are pointing, 6 of the 9 relations are for the Bus
311. I never
2012/12/4 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com
Hi!
After reading all the responses I have to conclude that we don't
really have a perfect solution right now. I guess the best would be a
cleanup of the relations: on ways where more than one (or two)
relations are present, create a new
relations. There are some
relations where it is already in use. If I'm not mistaken long foot/hiking
routes.
Rather than 'winning' a vote we should try to get support from öpnv-karte,
transportmap and OSMtransport. Once those big players render it, the rest
will most likely follow.
Jo
, but of course, this means several
sources are used and mixed in one changeset. In fact I stopped adding
sources. It's true that it doesn't make a lot of sense to clog the objects
with them, but when uploading, I always tend to forget to mention it on the
changeset anyway.
Jo
It seems that you would like a specific role, which you can add to 2
members of a route relation (I'd add it to the two ways around your
imaginary gap).
If you do it that way, you don't need a non-existing member. And you don't
need to add nodes to a relation which consists of ways.
This doesn't
2013/2/23 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de
Am 23.02.2013 20:02, schrieb Jo:
It seems that you would like a specific role, which you can add to 2
members of a route relation (I'd add it to the two ways around your
imaginary gap).
If you do it that way, you don't need a non-existing
I added a wikidata tag to our main church:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/15183730
What is the (intended) effect?
Will it be possible to visualise it somewhere?
Jo
2013/2/26 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com
Hi,
I made a wikidata tag proposal, here is the link:
http
on your stops, you
could use zone:ptv, but it seems better to add operator=ptv or operator=PT
Victoria.
Cheers,
Jo
2013/3/3 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I don't see any wiki documentation on public transport zones: that
is, how to tag that station X is in zone 3, station Y
or a crossing.
Although even that is normal. Because traffic that makes a turn has to
yield for traffic traveling straight on.
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
FWIW I also prefer one way per track. When the tracks are embedded in the
tarmac of a normal 2 way street, I'll draw 3 ways (2 railways and 1
highway), each with the name included. When I bother to add
associatedStreet relations I'd add all of them into it.
When it's 1 track on a one way street
have shops
specialised in chocolate confectionery ('pralines' in French/Dutch)
Jo
2013/6/3 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
On 03/giu/2013, at 08:55, Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com wrote:
So we can had the tag baking=no for those shop without oven.
there is a tag oven
they are not allowed to call those
extension outlets 'warme bakker'.
Would we have to recognise it from the absence of the craft tag? That seems
a bit broken, as absence of a tag can mean that it was unknown, or
forgotten to add.
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging
On talk-fr somebody was wondering how to tag a building where a fire had
been. So the building is still there, but it's not usable anymore until
some major reconstruction takes place.
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
of the street lights which does the same in my street.
If we're going to be mapping all that, it may be interesting to indicate
whether sewage is already split in water that fell from the sky and actual
sewage...
Jo
2013/9/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
2013/9/4 Bryce Nesbitt bry
That sounds like the better tags Martin. In Belgium we also have social
restaurants.
Jo
Op 22 sep. 2013 11:25 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
het volgende:
2013/9/22 Andreas Labres l...@lab.at
Hi!
Does social market make sense to native English speakers?
I'm looking
Because we already have the social_facility keys, which are a lot more
suitable for the purpose. They are not really shops.
Jo
2013/9/23 Gilbert Hersschens gherssch...@gmail.com
Yet another ameniity...
Why not shop = food + access = social_pass (or something along this line) ?
Gilbert
People in Alaska might disagree with you... I have no idea whether dog
sledges are banned on certain streets, of course.
Jo
2013/10/16 Stefan Tiran stefan.ti...@student.tugraz.at
Hello,
SomeoneElse wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I have no doubt that these situations occur, I
Or possibly somebody changed the meaning of the tag on the wiki, without
telling dinosaurs like myself. At first it was a tag that went on ways
which are a dead end for cars. It got an icon in JOSM when put on nodes and
people started using it on end nodes.
Op 3 dec. 2013 15:28 schreef Mike N
The 4th option is to use turn restrictions on the crossing where the
'virtual' sign is placed.
Jo
2014-02-02 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
On 2014-02-01 10:05, Pee Wee wrote :
On the Dutch
forumhttp://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=394396#p394396there
is some
Recently I noticed the speed cameras I've been adding a few years ago at
exactly the positions they are (next to the street of couse, lest drivers
would bump into them) have become part of the highways.
So I'm in the process of correcting that once again. I also corrected the
wiki. Now it's up to
While I was adding name:etymology:wikidata=Q336977 tags to the many streets
in Belgium and the Netherlands that were name after the poet Guido Gezelle,
I encountered his tombstone.
I marked this with a subject:wikidata=Q336977 tag. I hope this is correct.
Does it make sense to add something to
What do you mean by 'factorize'?
Jo
2014-03-13 15:00 GMT+01:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi,
How great to finally more than an empty
pagehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet!!!
But now, if that relation factorizes (2) street name shouldn't
I've been experimenting with wikidata tagging in OSM a bit lately. One
doubt I have is when tagging tombstones with subject:wikidata. Is that
correct? Normally that one is used when an artistic image is made of
someone. What if it's a family grave with more than one 'subject'?
What if it's only
or rather brand:wikidata (which is already in the list)
2014-04-02 12:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
On 2 April 2014 11:08, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
in the case of a Franchise operator:wikidata would
not be McDonald's Corp. but the company
In order to apply the name:etymology:wikidata=Q... tags, I created
associatedStreet relations for most cases.
Polyglot
2014-04-02 14:47 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
2014-04-02 13:46 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
Is the assumption that one Wikidata object
I'm afraid I don't fully understand the reasoning behind OSM having its own
wikidata DB. What extra (different) data would we store in it, which
couldn't go in Wikidata? I understand it in the case of Commons to store
metadata like diaphragma and lenses used when taking those pictures.
Oh, maybe
I was thinking the same thing, but couldn't put it into words properly. If
40% of noexit tags are on ways, this is meaningful, not some sort of
accident. FWIW I also prefer to put the tag on the way, I don't care about
the gratification that it gets rendered with a nifty icon in JOSM when put
on a
OK, I didn't check. Maybe I consulted the wiki at the wrong point in time
and got it wrong for the past 6 years.
Polyglot
2014-04-04 17:53 GMT+02:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
On 03.12.2013 17:08, Jo wrote:
Or possibly somebody changed the meaning of the tag on the wiki, without
page, with links that can
be clicked in a convenient way to edit with JOSM remote control.
Jo
2014-06-26 14:21 GMT+02:00 Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com:
2014-06-26 12:44 GMT+01:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
Hi, I wonder if this phrase without an explanation link
http
Bayford:
operator:wikidata=Q4874513
The ones of my previous mail should also have been operator:wikidata
Polyglot
2014-06-30 12:27 GMT+02:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
The University of Derby would be:
wikidata:operator=Q3183295
Devonshire Royal Hospital
wikidata:operator=Q5267877
Does
Indeed, sorry about that.
2014-06-30 12:46 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2014-06-30 12:27 GMT+02:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
The University of Derby would be:
wikidata:operator=Q3183295
Devonshire Royal Hospital
wikidata:operator=Q5267877
wouldn't
I'm strongly in favour of having the order as described here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
The advantage is that they sort near to what they apply to,
name:etymology:wikidata is near to name, operator:wikidata is near to
operator and so on.
I'm not sure why we
the upstream data and the data from
an Overpass Query is in a PostGIS DB, it's not very hard to analyse it to
one's heart content and create reports for the wiki with clickable links so
they can be opened with JOSM or Merkaartor by remote control.
Jo
2014-06-30 15:44 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa
I've been experimenting with Wikidata a bit. I'm not a Wikipedian, rather a
convinced Openstreetmapper. One of the problems I had with Wiktionary and
Wikipedia is how data is duplicated over and over again. Wikidata finally
started solving that.
We should take advantage from that.
Here are some
I tend to understand your concern, but I don't happen to share it and
this is based on practical experience built up over the past years, doing
exactly what we want to do with the TEC data: importing stops and creating
route relations based on them.
Jo
PT.overpass
Description: Binary data
The same is true for cycling and equestrian networks with numbered nodes.
There are a few of those networks in Germany as well.
These are not collections/categories. They are networks of route relations.
Jo
2014-07-16 5:23 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
In Belgium
We have been tagging these networks this way since the beginning of
Openstreetmap.org. The network relations combine the nodes and the route
relations for a given network of numbered walking/cycling/horsback riding
network.
equestrian networks get rhn. lhn. nhn and ihn don't exist, as far as I
which connect the nodes.
Where they insisted on adding the nodes to the routes as well, I gave up.
Of course, this also means I also gave up on checking those routes for
continuity in the Netherlands, hence the inconsistency.
Jo
2014-07-16 16:10 GMT+02:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul
Again, you are obviously not talking about the same thing.
2014-07-16 16:59 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
I'm going to have to side with Pieren against the network relation. Just
spitballing, but that would roughly mean one network per county, and an
additional 1-8 networks
Once upon a time, I created a wiki page about the subject:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging
This is one of the more complex situations. Most are simpler than that.
Jo
2014-07-16 17:23 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:57 AM
.
It's simply a matter of moving the 'complexity' from one place to another.
Oh well, we'll have to discuss this on the Belgian and Dutch mailing
lists/forums.
Jo
2014-07-16 18:05 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
your
. Are you sure yours aren't speed
cameras as well?
Jo
2014-07-22 10:38 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
I hesitate to just invent a new highway=*_camera tag, beause I don't
actually like it to be under the highway key (something accepted for the
speed_camera probably only
FYI it will remain a numeric ID, so it's unlikely you will ever become
unagainst it.
Editor support may help in displaying a human readable tag, but that will
depend on the software, of course.
Jo
2014-08-19 8:52 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
2014-08-19 0:38 GMT+02:00
maybe it should be nudism/naturism=not_anymore or paradise_lost
Jo
2014-08-19 11:13 GMT+02:00 Heiko Wöhrle m...@heikowoehrle.de:
i was also thinking about that. i think it is only neccesary if a former
nudist place is changed to a place where clothing is expected
Am 19.08.2014 09:37
In bus route relations the ways don't get roles. In this case some ways
would be members twice.
In walking and cycling route relations we do use them. Those are
bidirectional, whereas the bus and tram routes describe start to terminus
for all variations.
Jo
On Sep 5, 2014 1:04 PM, Dave F. dave
This is one example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3612781
This is another:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3908930
Jo
2014-09-05 21:07 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Most bus routes in Belgium have
in this route_master. Where the
routes go over the highway between Brussels and Leuven and Leuven and
Aarschot, it's obvious they are using the side of the highways which goes
in their direction of travel.
Hopefully this clarifies what I mean by variations. This one has 4, 2 in
each direction.
Jo
2014-09-06 5
I hope noboby is still using the older way of adding bus routes for adding
new bus routes to OSM.
Jo
2014-09-06 8:33 GMT+02:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com:
If that is the case, then this street will be present in some variations
of the bus routes for that line and the parallel street
, except for those
which are only to let people off or on. But usually I add a platform role
anyway. Even though it's obvious that a node tagged with
public_transport=platform/highway=bus_stop is a platform and a way is part
of the route.
Jo
2014-09-06 12:10 GMT+02:00 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
.
This is enough information to calculate the stop_positions automatically.
Adding them would mean constantly validating whether they are still correct
though.
Jo
2014-09-06 15:12 GMT+02:00 Éric Gillet fear.hardcore+...@gmail.com:
Now if it were me, I wouldn't add roles to stops either
While experimenting a bit with Wikidata, I added some subject:wikidata tags
to tombstones:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%3Cquery%20type%3D%22node%22%3E%0A%20%20%3Chas-kv%20k%3D%22subject%3Awikidata%22%20v%3D%22Q336977%22%2F%3E%0A%3C%2Fquery%3E%0A%3Cprint%2F%3EC=51.1936;3.23812;18
Jo
2014-10-01
the list. I'm sorry, but it's not because 7;8;10;11 are there that 9
necessarily is missing from the list.
I deleted everything which was hidden under the three dots.
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
It's an actual example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/80725474
https://delijn.be/nl/haltes/halte/303059 (real time information)
121 characters... there's still some breathing room. I guess the risk of
the street getting congested is higher than hitting the 255 characters
limit.
Jo
Rattling on about those bus stops, I have an other example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/485938967
bus http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus?uselang=en-US yes highway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway?uselang=en-US bus_stop
. You can work with it
any way you like.
By now, it should be clear you're not finding any support here for
converting semicolon delimited lists to some more verbose format.
The only consensus I see emerging is that we should avoid them where this
is practical and possible.
Jo
2015-01-23 21:53 GMT+01:00 moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com:
On 22/01/2015, Johan C osm...@gmail.com wrote:
From an OSM point-of-view, which includes being friendly towards novice
users, relations should be avoided whenever possible. And
associatedStreet
relations are avoidable.
The
I think relation street applies to all the way segments of the whole street
with the same name (if in the same municipality), but I didn't check to be
honest.
2015-02-06 19:44 GMT+01:00 Luca Sigfrido Percich luca.perc...@gmail.com:
Many thanks Jo!
Volker also suggests that I should see how
That's how it was initially done in most places, before we started mapping
those tracks in more detail, which became possible thanks to improved
resolution of the aerial imagery (and in the case of Brussels, thanks to
UrbIS opening the data)
Jo
2015-02-07 4:02 GMT+01:00 James Mast rickmastfa
.
Jo
2015-02-07 0:31 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
2015-02-06 17:29 GMT+01:00 Luca Sigfrido Percich luca.perc...@gmail.com:
We could also user a lanes modifier:
lanes=3
lanes:backward=2
tram:lanes:backward=yes|no
tram:forward=yes
I think this is the best way to tag
makes sense?
Jo
2015-02-06 17:29 GMT+01:00 Luca Sigfrido Percich luca.perc...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
first time I write to the list (after lurking for a while), so I introduce
myself. I am from Milano - Italy, I work for the municipality's agency for
environment and mobility, and we'we been working
(on the
straight parts) for the highway. An exception to that are dual
carriageways, with the rails embedded, but usually the rails are between
the carriageways in that case.
Jo
2015-02-08 19:45 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
2015-02-08 17:48 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com
is it one asphalt way with one track? Then I agree. Or is it one asphalt
way with two tracks, one for each direction of the tram lines? Then I'd
draw 3 ways, 2 for the tracks, and 1 for the highway.
Jo
2015-02-08 21:35 GMT+01:00 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
On 8 February 2015
The 'new' public transport scheme actually has 'binary' keys for bus, tram,
train, etc.
When you ask to have it rendered, one of the arguments for not doing so is
that those extra fields are not imported in the DB specifically set up for
rendering. It's considered too complicated, even though the
.
Both the addresses in Brussels and The Netherlands were imported from
sources with a suitable license.
Jo
2015-01-18 22:23 GMT+01:00 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
On 18 January 2015 at 22:11, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-01-18 20:52 GMT+00:00 Markus Lindholm
broken. Or at least it's easier
to notice that they are broken and where, as long as the ways are ordered.
Jo
2015-02-16 18:58 GMT+01:00 Éric Gillet gill3t.3ric+...@gmail.com:
2015-02-16 13:03 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
There are still cases where forward/backward are useful with P2
.)
Jo
2015-02-16 13:03 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
There are still cases where forward/backward are useful with P2-routes.
E.g. a route with a loop and some members used twice but different
directions.
Personally, I still use forward/backward on any member of a route which
And dedication was proposed.
As one of the first comments in this thread. Then it was repeated when
dedication:wikidata was mentioned.
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
this as
an excercise for other communities.
I think that handling this in a local way is the right move.
- Serge
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes I remove stuff by accident realize it later and instead of
going
back just replace it, because I did more
If this tag is to be useful (assuming it is the sort of thing OSM
should record), maybe using Wikidata should be considered through an
additional tag such as dedication:wikidata=Q33923 for Saint Peter
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q33923
I also think we should add wikidata tags right away
Sometimes I remove stuff by accident realize it later and instead of going
back just replace it, because I did more stuff in that time and don't want
to lose my work.
If you care about preserving the history of that object, you could do the
following in JOSM:
Create new layer
Download data
a
popular language ;-)
The fact is that in French, we use no such words as Blessed.
What about sacré-coeur?
Jo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
