Am 14.10.2012 18:09, schrieb Fabien SK:
- I create an OSM account for this task
highly appreciated.
And discussing it with the Japanese community as already mentioned is a
very good idea.
Best regards,
Michael.
___
Tagging mailing list
On 31.01.2013 12:06, Martin Vonwald wrote:
I'm looking for some alternatives to map tunnels and bridges that
contain several ways. I'm not really happy with the proposed relation
-1
The current method is used and well established since years and for my
point of view works fine. So I clearly
on 28.01.2014 12:28, Janko Mihelić wrote:
because it's not a common problem.
???
there are e.g. a lot of shopping centers out there...
Best regards,
Michael.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Am 22.02.2014 00:32, schrieb ueliw0:
with wikidata now operational, I was wondering if it would make sense
to use (tag) wikidata items instead of the wikipedia links.
for me wikipedia still makes sense: I think that there is not a wikidata
page/ID available for every article.
And: article
On 03.07.2014 21:55, Fernando Trebien wrote:
Is there anyone routing over runways today?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibraltar_Airport;-)
Cheers,
Michael.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Am 15.07.2014 17:58, schrieb Pieren:
I discover that OSM contains 1575 relations of type=network
(taginfo). I guess its definition is coming from this wiki proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Network
As a hint for further inverstigations: I guess this might be public
Am 16.07.2014 05:23, schrieb Marc Gemis:
In Belgium and The Netherlands a network-relation is used to group
together all nodes and routes of a walking network.
relations are NO CATEGORIES in OSM, that's agreed since years!
Please delete these relations.
BTW: it's not possible to keep such a
On 16.07.2014 13:31, John Packer wrote:
but not without adding the appropriate tags to it's members
of course! I never wanted something different.
Cheers,
Michael.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Am 01.09.2014 12:20, schrieb Severin Menard:
How should we map the livestock pens in farmyards?
barrier = fence
And (IMHO): it should be a permanet installation and no temporary thing...
Cheers,
Michael.
___
Tagging mailing list
Am 15.09.2014 13:26, schrieb Dave F.:
oneway=yes to access:backward=no
oneway=yes is used sinde 10 years, IMHO there is no reason for a change!
just my 2 cents,
Michael.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 26.10.2014 17:12, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Please, try mapping bays as areas - not as nodes.
but if you - for whatever reason ever - can't map it as area then it's
better to map it as node instead not mapping it at all...
Just an example: I did it some times ago with something (can't
On 30.10.2014 12:51, Richard Z. wrote:
their definition of gulf of mexico is obviously
not compatible with our definition of bay
IMHO: this has some similarities to definition of regions like the
Alps or the Rocky Mountains...
Cheers,
Michael.
Am 23.12.2014 um 11:36 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Ulrich, please modify the subject line to something that describes the
topic when writing to the list.
I even would ask NOT AT ALL to comment on digests but on the individual
posts. Reason: commenting on digests destroys the comment linking =
Am 23.12.2014 um 17:37 schrieb Rainer Fügenstein:
what is needed here is some tag, saying don't touch these
coordinates, they've been surveyed with high(est) accuracy.
maybe just add a note to the pipeline (note = maped mit GPS with
guaranteed accuracy of blahblah).
Cheers,
Michael.
Am 15.01.2015 um 02:02 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann:
This is for grouping features that are more or less of the same kind. See
examples.
No, this is not the same as a site relation.
I for myself would put all related objects inside a multipart relation
and add the attributes (key/values) to that
Am 02.01.2015 um 07:33 schrieb Megha Shrestha:
Do we tag the whole area as owner =* ???
Oh no, please try to avoid this!!! We collect GEO-FACTS in OSM and are
no land title register.
Please also try to take care of privacy concerns.
And think about that the fact needs to be checkable easily by
16 matches
Mail list logo
