[Tagging] Tags versus Maps

Hi, My name is ZMWandelaar (GB: SundayAfternoonHiker) and living in the Netherlands. I’m starting May of this year. Quit active and wondering if there is some documentation about tags rendered on particular maps? Starting on the OSM Base Map what tags are displayed? Thanks ZMWandelaar

Re: [Tagging] Tags versus Maps

/Mapnik. Under the header stylesheet there are details about rendering features described http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapnik#Stylesheet Willi On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info wrote: My name is ZMWandelaar (GB: SundayAfternoonHiker) and living

[Tagging] Mapnik Software

Hi, We all know there lot of our maps are rendered with Mapnik. Does somebody knows if there is development going on on this software. Dows thsi software package evolve in supporting more complex situation in GeoData? Robert___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] New tag?

. If there's not? There is a nice job for you to do. And I can say that it's THE way to learn most of the tags. ;) Robert Elsenaar -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Diego Woitasen try to Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 3:14 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re

Re: [Tagging] Operator in leisure=stadium?

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/ Robert -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Alan Mintz Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:46 AM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Operator in leisure=stadium? At 2010-12-18 12:47, Diego Woitasen wrote: I haven't found an

Re: [Tagging] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state? (response to 2010-12-26 05:29:46)

Totally agree. More over, every time you use the symbol : in your tag, you mean that the subtag is telling something more specific about the maintag thats in front of it. This methode should be introduced more widely all over OSM to avoid annoying new and unnesseccerry tags or values. Robert

[Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys

Hi, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features lists a certain portion of approved tags. - Why only a part of all approved tags are mentioned here? - Where should I go to find the ultimate list of approved tags? -Robert- ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] designated bike lane

hazard:bicycle is the other way round. If there is a key/value e.g. hazard=narrow then you can easily use cycleway:hazard=narrow to tag the fact that the hazard tag is specificly warns for a narrow cycle-lane. highway=* cycleway:right=lane cycleway:width=0.5 cycleway:hazard=narrow I think

Re: [Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys

To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info wrote: Hi, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features lists a certain portion of approved tags. - Why only a part of all

[Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Looking on tags for cycleways I find 3 different types: highway=cycleway: obvious these are free ways like here (http://maps.google.nl/maps?hl=nlie=UTF8ll=51.810446,5.173895spn=0.00589,0.021136z=16layer=ccbll=51.810477,5.173954panoid=AELkS3h8zmUs821tPi1K-wcbp=12,36.33,,0,6.46) cycleway=lane:

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Koppenhoefer Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 8:02 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways 2011/1/5 Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info: Looking on tags for cycleways I find 3 different types: highway=cycleway: obvious these are free ways like

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - deaddrop

No, not the latest virus. You can share your favorite virus. -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: j...@jfeldredge.com Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:20 PM To: OpenStreetMap tagging mailing list Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - deaddrop Sounds like a good way to

Re: [Tagging] What is rtc_rate?

RTC is the abbriviation of Regional Transportation Commission. So the amout of money you have to pay for e.g. a bus ride. -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Nathan Edgars II Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:59 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject:

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Ladies and gentlemen, All great thoughts. Peter i take your critisism on the right way. Still you didn't answer my call for help. Let go back to the base of my question: cycleway=track = Who can give me examples on Google street view of what we have to concider to be

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info wrote: Ladies and gentlemen, All great thoughts. Peter i take your critisism on the right way. Still you didn't answer my call for help. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

is a distinct novelty for the UK!) Richard On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info wrote: Ladies and gentlemen, All great thoughts. Peter i take your critisism on the right way. Still you didn't answer my call for help. Let go back to the base of my question: cycleway

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Peter wrote: If you tag it as cycleway:both=track, it's more clear. Yes you are right. But implicite we have accepted several default in our tags. E.g. we tag highway=residential and more precice would be highway:type=residential And we tag surface=asphalt and more precise would be

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Drawing seperated ways is a workaround for a “Not yet solvable” problem. By drawing a second way, what’s not there, is implicitely wrong. There is NO SECOND WAY so try not to draw it then. And yes I admit, I do use often the “second way solution” to solve complex situations or situations were

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

. -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Georg Feddern Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 5:00 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways Robert Elsenaar schrieb: Peter wrote: If you tag it as cycleway:both=track, it's more clear. Yes you

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Please define seperation? -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Nathan Edgars II Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:54 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Robert Elsenaar rob

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info wrote: -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Nathan Edgars II Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:54 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

\Panda%20Global%20Protection%202011\AntiSpam --- Am 09.01.2011 11:37, schrieb Robert Elsenaar: Ok, great. If that is the ultimate solution for all cycletracks. Can you help me with the remaining

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

Dear Nathan, This replay seems to be a little off-topic, but I want to put it here anyway. Sinds I started this topic it became clear that several people understands that there is a general problem with seperated cycleways not being part anymore of the main road. They mainly try to find a

Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways

10:16 PM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: [SPAM]: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info wrote: Dear Nathan, This replay seems to be a little off-topic, but I want to put it here anyway. Sinds I

Re: [Tagging] RFC: historic:civilization and historic:period Re: newkey civilization

historic:period can also be interprtated by historical periods in fine arts. -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:40 PM To: j...@jfeldredge.com ; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: [Tagging] RFC:

Re: [Tagging] RFC: historic:civilization and historic:period Re: new key civilization

There is always a border where usefull meets unusefull. When mapmakers do not support object information on their maps, every extra information is useless. I think the period of a historic place is within the usefull information tags to a object. -Robert- From: Pieren Sent: Wednesday, January

Re: [Tagging] RFC: historic:civilization and historic:period Re:new key civilization

Certainly not like that. I will start a new thread to discuss this idea more in detail. I think there's nothing wrong when we try to standardize tags and have a moment of retagging when we have a 1:1 substitution. -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: JohanJönsson Sent: Thursday,

[Tagging] Main tags, values and sub tags

Since I updated the Dutch Feature Page I analyzed the tagging system and found out a typically evolution in the way OSM is tagging map objects. 1) Key=Value: Simple tagging system. Every new Tag has to be created. Every Tag and every value has to be documented. You vcan not be creative in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Scuba diving (Shop or spot)

- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: John Smith Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:25 AM To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Scuba diving (Shop or spot) On 18 January 2011 04:46, Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info wrote: * scuba_diving:filling

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Metropolis

Great idea to reactivate is again. New times, new ideas. I think capitals should be tagged to be Metropolis to also when they do not have enough inhibitans to be granted as one. -Robert- -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 5:11 PM To:

Re: [Tagging] associatedStreet

Jo, This correct. Also the terrasser plugin makes relations like that. Robert -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:19 PM To: winfi...@gmail.com ; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] associatedStreet Hi Jo

Re: [Tagging] Footway as painted lane in highway

I would do the same.  Met vriendelijke groeten Robert Elsenaar Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com schreef: Hi I have a country lane where on one side has a dashed white line about 1.5m from the road edge a walking person symbol painted on the surface. It has no adjacent raised kerb footpath