On 24/09/2014 1:27 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:43:07 +0200 From: Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com To: Tag discussion, strategy and related
tools tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] New key
proposal - paved=yes/no Message-ID:
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:46:45 +0100 From: Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com To: Tag discussion, strategy and related
tools tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] RFC Bag shop
Message-ID:
cabptjtczkn_qr+jjhpkiku7dy5cnvtmhjypzxq9dt6kkuv1...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type:
I would tag for the 'usual condition' of the track. And updating the map
for a tempory situation is not realistic? And as you say the indication
of the track should remain, at least while it is visiable and of use to
navigation.
While the smothenss may not go far enough .. tag it as best you
On 4/11/2014 10:30 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:14:11 +0900
From: johnw jo...@mac.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] path vs footway
Message-ID:
On 5/11/2014 12:59 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:58:39 +0100
From: Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] bridleways / Re: path vs footway
Message-ID:
On 8/11/2014 7:27 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:14:45 -0700
From: Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] hitch rack for horses
Message-ID:
of the world would not
these efforts be better spent in improving the map elsewhere? :)
-
Warin
Presently considering a holiday in India .. and making editorials there
to get the routing working (and adding things as I see them while doing
those corrections
On 12/11/2014 9:35 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
A non-potable water introduces two problems:
1) a mapper may not know if the water is potable or not; there may be no
way to check it or he may not be able to do it; still adding a water source
is useful;
2) I don't like creating
On 12/11/2014 8:34 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:06:15 +0100
From: Pierenpier...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31
Message-ID:
On 18/11/2014 9:53 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:25:34 +0100
From: Elena ``of Valhalla'' elena.valha...@gmail.com
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap
Message-ID:
On 4/12/2014 10:14 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:13:43 +0100
From: Kotya Karapetyan kotya.li...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap
Message-ID:
tags. Simply the additional information
can be added.
Warin, I don't know if you followed the discussion and saw the proposal in
the wiki.
In short, it all started with the lack of good option to map a source of
non-potable water, like a water tap. It evolved from there to the current
state
Karapetyan)
Message-ID:
cabptjtaphvzhj31rld1s5awfo2bntryve+mqmv-eu_mubjd...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
2014-12-04 12:03 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
The main choice for water tap is between man_made = water_tap or amenity
= water_tap. I have
On 7/12/2014 11:00 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 19:43:36 +0100
From: Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] man_made=adit_entrance
Message-ID: 54834e58.8000...@volki.at
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 12/12/2014 3:44 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:05:03 -0800
From: Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Moveable objects tagged as
On 22/12/2014 9:09 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
2014-12-22 6:24 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
mailto:matkoni...@gmail.com:
No, no, no.
In my opinion, there are a few nos missing here. So I'll add at least
one more: no. Well, make that two: No.
Let me
On 22/12/2014 11:00 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:53:53 +0100
From: Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Obligatory vs.
On 24/12/2014 11:29 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 17:37:34 +0100
From: Rainer Fügenstein r...@oudeis.org
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] Accuracy of survey
Message-ID:
On 29/12/2014 9:33 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:18:28 -0800
From: Bryce Nesbittbry...@obviously.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap
On 30/12/2014 6:41 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:27:23 +0100
From: Kotya Karapetyan kotya.li...@gmail.com
To: Rainer Fügenstein r...@oudeis.org, Tag discussion, strategy and
related tools tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Accuracy
On 2/01/2015 6:03 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 05:00:24 +
From: Megha Shresthameghashrest...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] Tagging private property
Message-ID:
On 2/01/2015 11:00 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 11:31:36 +0100
From: Martin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap
On 3/01/2015 4:56 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 04:45:24 +0100
From: Andreas Gossandi...@t-online.de
To:tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and
terminal without building tag
On 25/01/2015 5:39 AM, Eric SIBERT wrote:
I wonder if there are enough of them to warrant their own bridge=*,
as there are so many kinds of bridges. I bet we can put a ford tag on
the bridge - it might be a simple solution.
I agree with your suggestion of using boot bridge=yes and ford=yes as
On 4/02/2015 8:59 PM, David Bannon wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 12:58 +0700, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Well, dump_point might be a workable compromise and it plays well with
Dave, are we still looking for a name for a new tag when it seems we can
work with whats already there ?
tourism=camp_site
mentioning it (the same way as we in Europe use centigrade
without underlying it). Taking into account the international nature
of the OSM community, I foresee a significant risk that the map will
get populated with invalid values. Warin is right about SI units, but
SI is not even strictly followed
On 5/02/2015 10:31 AM, David Bannon wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 10:02 +1100, Warin wrote:
...some sensible stuff
Warin, I need to head out now and will look at rest of you questions
later. But one question, how about a 'flatter' approach ?
amenity=dump_point (or dump_station ...)
amenity=dog
On 5/02/2015 9:02 AM, David Bannon wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 08:23 +1100, Warin wrote:
The 'amenity=waste_disposal does not look to have been through an
aproval process ... nor does any tag. The 'approval process' is
voluntary ..
Not sure I agree there ! There is an approval process
On 3/02/2015 8:10 AM, Clifford Snow wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
mailto:j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Once again, we are divided by a common language. In American
usage, a cistern is a holding tank for captured rain water, used
as an
On 3/02/2015 8:46 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 2 February 2015 at 05:56, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Not found an OSM sewer dump point key.
Lots of United Kingdom canals have these. See also:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pumpout
http
Hi,
Reading the wiki on key:amenity=waste_disposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal
says .. it is not for 'watery waste disposal' .. yet the key:waste says
it is for 'watery waste disposal'
It needs a rewrite into a sensible thing! That is consistent! And
waste=* subkeys for recyclable items, paper items, etc.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Reading the wiki on key:amenity=waste_disposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal
says
and human waste, many
caravans and motorhomes have chemical toilets and need a very specific
dump station to empty. In most cases, its not acceptable to empty them
into a a normal toilet, the chemicals some people use can devastate a
septic tank.
Warin, I am a bit surprised you have added
On 5/02/2015 12:04 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean a one step? Like highway= x ?
To do that I'd think a new supper key waste= at the top level!
And maybe that is what it needs
On 7/02/2015 6:03 PM, Alex Rollin wrote:
imho a courtyard is related to leisure.
why for: because a courtyard matters to people with leisure time and
it is a luxury of sorts.
why against: perhaps a courtyard is a sequestered area/way as it is
often tagger highway designated footpath as an
Done. Thanks .. I knew there was one out there somewhere. I think
amenity=dump_station needs to be redone, the reasons for its rejection
by some have been outdated by the quoted tags evolving over time making
amenity=dump_station essential.
. On 2/02/2015 9:29 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
I
Hi,
Request for comment on new tag 'amenity=reception_desk'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dreception_desk
This comes out of the tag ON HT E tourism=camp_site WIKI PAGE which has
a sub key of camp_site=reception.
As 'Receptions' are numerous outside of camp sites I think
I have just proposed a new tag of amenity=reception_desk, this would
obsolete the camp_site=reception as I think reception should be
available for use in hotels, offices etc. Just alereting the camp site
people who may miss the new proposed key.
On 5/02/2015 12:04 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean a one step? Like highway= x ?
To do that I'd think a new supper key waste= at the top level!
And maybe that is what it needs
On 8/02/2015 3:41 AM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
Amenity is the best fit for this tag.
I disagree. (Usually that just means I didn't find anything better)
+1
Amenity is very vague in general (), and a lot of things can be
marked as such. So I'd prefer to use it only when it's an obvious
choice
On 7/02/2015 9:15 PM, Andreas Goss wrote:
Amenity is the best fit for this tag.
I disagree. (Usually that just means I didn't find anything better)
As this tag is always going to be used within another entity
Always is such a large word. What about a hut that is used only for
reception?
On 8/02/2015 1:18 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Actually, I was not referring to a new top level tag of waste=* but to
amenity=dump_point. I quoted from the previous post but that was very
misleading.
I wanted to avoid the proliferation of waste types that must be
associated with a new tag of
On 9/02/2015 1:47 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
From a technical point of view they are typically associated with fire
protection (way to leave the building, access for firefighters),
If the courtyard is fully enclosed by buildings or by one building ..
they are not part of a fire escape
A proposal for a new high level tag of .. Rubbish :-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features_key%3Drubbish
At present there as a number of 'waste' values under the amenity key.
Some people say the amenity key is being over used. There are people
thinking of adding more waste
On 4/02/2015 9:38 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I think dump station is probably intended to refer to facilities
intended to receive the sewage from chemical toilets on board
recreational vehicles, and from man-portable chemical toilets
(basically a bucket with a seat and a tight-fitting lid).
On 3/02/2015 7:51 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Feb 1, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Warin wrote:
On 2/02/2015 10:22 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:50 PM, David Bannon wrote:
I would like to have some of the items on Extend_camp_site page brought onto
the main camp_site page. Specifically the site
On 4/02/2015 9:38 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
There is no documentation of the waste= values .. if you want to
add them go ahead. Anything there would be an improvement.
I check on the UK terms for chemical toilets ..
On 3/02/2015 7:51 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Feb 1, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Warin wrote:
On 2/02/2015 10:22 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:50 PM, David Bannon wrote:
I would like to have some of the items on Extend_camp_site page brought onto
the main camp_site page. Specifically the site
On 3/02/2015 5:03 PM, David Bannon wrote:
In the context where this discussion came up, camp_sites, I'd suggest
waste=chemical_toilet is the one we are interested in. The
waste=excrement mentions boat. Boat facilities are distinctly different,
usually relying on a large hose connecting the two
Done .. well at least a first attempt.
Ok.. I've hacked at the words, added some tag links and given examples
of the waste= key on the main page just so people can see it includes
some things they have not thought of?
I hope it is better , more inclusive - less exclusive.
Complaints,
at 7:02 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/02/2015 9:38 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
There is no documentation of the waste= values .. if you want
to add them go ahead. Anything there would be an improvement.
I check on the UK
; charset=UTF-8
Hi,
On 01/14/2015 01:28 AM, Warin wrote:
What is the basic philosophy of OSM tagging at the top level?
There is no basic philosophy at the top level from which everything else
can be derived. It's like evolution - some things are a bit strange but
you can often understand them
On 20/01/2015 2:44 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:44:20 +0100
From: Hubert sg.fo...@gmx.de
To: 'Tag discussion, strategy and related tools'
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] sidewalk=* or footway=*
Message-ID:
On 20/01/2015 10:38 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:41:27 +0100
From: Peter Wendorffwendo...@uni-paderborn.de
To:tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging road illumination quality
Message-ID:54bd5de7.2070...@uni-paderborn.de
Content-Type:
On 21/01/2015 10:03 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:43:16 +
From: Lukas Sommersommer...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] waterway=wadi problem
Message-ID:
On 20/01/2015 6:55 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:55:37 +0100
From: Volker Schmidtvosc...@gmail.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging road illumination quality
Message-ID:
On 18/01/2015 5:14 PM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:14:36 -0600
From: John F. Eldredgej...@jfeldredge.com
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
tagging@openstreetmap.org, Volker Schmidtvosc...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging road
On 12/02/2015 3:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
A hotel room that has air conditioning may be both heated or
cooled depending on the desired temperature and the ambient
temperature
On 2/02/2015 4:34 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Dave Swarthout
daveswarth...@gmail.com mailto:daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 Nobody votes because it's a borderline pointless endeavor.
Yep.
Thus things don't get approved due to lack of votes because few
On 12/02/2015 10:25 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
On February 11, 2015 3:59:45 PM CST, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/02/2015 3:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Most air conditioners here have the ability to both heat and cool at
least here and in the UK.
Technically, a unit that can either
On 12/02/2015 9:57 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you consider heated and cooled an 'interesting
characteristic' and how do you see it being rendered on to a map?
Is it more 'important
Getting further and further away from tag:temperature=
On 12/02/2015 12:37 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
On February 11, 2015 6:16:39 PM CST, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/02/2015 10:25 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
On February 11, 2015 3:59:45 PM CST, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
Hi,
The OSM data is in English. And the data you are trying to search for is
tagged amenity=recycling or amenity=recycling_point.
Your trying to search for it using French terms (as shown in the table
you have below) .. some work, some don't.
This would be an application issue? Rather than
On 12/02/2015 1:23 PM, johnw wrote:
On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Kotya Karapetyan kotya.li...@gmail.com wrote:
1) +1 to drop Kelvins.
2) heated/cooled is a nice idea, but I wouldn't like seeing too many
top level tags.
Danger-cold
cold
cool
mild
warm
hot
danger-hot
I don’t think is
On 18/02/2015 11:07 AM, John Willis wrote:
Religious landuse is not about saying that the ground is religious, any more than saying
landuse=retail is land that is for sale - it is for the land dedicated to a facility where people
worship - just as retail is where people sell, and residential
On 18/02/2015 11:33 AM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
mailto:bry...@obviously.com wrote:
You can recycle all sorts of existing tags, there is no need to
invent new ones:
Exactly. If we adopt a top level amenity tag for our
On 18/02/2015 5:42 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Jan van Bekkum
jan.vanbek...@gmail.com mailto:jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote for the middle option: waste=dump_station. My main reason
is that it consistent with the existing system and that there will
On 19/02/2015 8:33 AM, David Bannon wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 12:33 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
amenity=elsan_point ?
While it's opaque in the usa, at least it's not ambiguous.
or
amenity=checmical_toilet_disposal_point.
Bryce, here in Australia, we use a lot of UK terms (and frown on the
After over a week of comments on the proposal of a new key rubbish= ..
this is the replacement by a new proposal for the new key:
waste_collection.
The same points for this proposal exist as for the key:rubbish .. but
with a better name.
On 19/02/2015 8:19 AM, David Bannon wrote:
Subject renamed for clarity.
* leaving it as it is - easy choice
* Adding dump_station to waste= - consistent with whats there now.
* Adding dump_station to amenity= - easier to map (?)
...I vote for the middle option: waste=dump_station
On Wed,
On 13/02/2015 3:38 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de writes:
Am 18.01.2015 um 07:14 schrieb John F. Eldredge:
You could use a light meter to measure how bright the light is. That
isn't the only factor in the suitability of the lighting, but it is
objective.
...
On 12/02/2015 9:43 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Why is a node needed? Here some samples..
Do you have any examples where a specific temperature is measurable?
Do you imagine these tags getting used for buildings like motel rooms,
huts and caves: and if so what's the suggested tagging scheme for
On 12/02/2015 6:08 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:51 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com
mailto:jo...@mac.com wrote:
Danger-cold
cold
cool
mild
warm
hot
danger-hot
What are some example nodes, where this proposed tag may apply,
and how you
On 12/02/2015 7:30 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd add the tag to any node where I thought the temperature important,
significant and I knew the temperature .. even if only subjective .. such as
hot. If the temperature changes
On 18/02/2015 8:32 AM, David Bannon wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 10:30 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
It's hard to go far wrong with a dedicated tag for a feature with:
1) A strong clear definition
2) That features prominently on printed recreation maps, with a
standard icon.
3) Has a large
On 19/02/2015 7:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there are also few amenity=maze and historic and tourism.
The key attraction is used according to the wiki for features on a playground
or in a theme park.
Given the huge variety of maze types (ranging from built ones in masonry, ones
made of
On 19/02/2015 8:15 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
The problem with
tourism=attraction
attraction=maze
Is that attraction is a top level tag, not a subtag of tourism=attraction.
So maybe:
tourism=attraction
type=maze
subtypes=labyrinth;hedge
I'd do
tourism=maze ... similar to zoo, theme park,
On 19/02/2015 9:59 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-02-18 23:09 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/waste_collection
I believe there are still some issues with this proposal.
For one the concept
On 19/02/2015 11:01 PM, ael wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:23:38PM -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
It's clear there's on one term that's perfect.
Moving on, here is:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sanitary_Dump_Station
That looks fine. Although not common in UK English, it
Would apply to travellers flying or going on a sea voyage for some time.
The parking= key looks to give information on the physical layout of the
parking - underground/ground level only, multi-story etc. So may not be
the best place for this information?
Would not the tag maxstay give some
Oh .. you want to determine if the parking is covered or not?
then
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
and/or
use the present values of the key parking=
underground, sheds, carports, garage_boxes, multi-storey ?
any other value or missing tags take as uncovered?
Adds no tags ..
On 17/02/2015 6:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, David Bannon
dban...@internode.on.net mailto:dban...@internode.on.net wrote:
To summarise discussion, structures like -
amenity=campsite
campsite=waste_disposal
waste=chemical_toilet
is a bit clumsy given how
On 17/02/2015 6:47 AM, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
Please comment the proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/power_supply%3Dintermittentto
add the value /intermittent /to the key/power_supply./
Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards,
/Jan van Bekkum/
On 17/02/2015 6:50 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Intermittent is an attribute,
not a top level value.
For example, it should be possible to tag a NEMA 5-15 as intermittent.
so a tag sequence of
power_supply=nema_5_15
power_supply:intermittent=yes
?
And then for my previous comments become;
On 16/02/2015 11:26 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-02-08 23:15 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com:
A proposal for a new high level tag of .. Rubbish :-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features_key%3Drubbish
At present
On 16/02/2015 11:33 PM, fly wrote:
Be careful some mast as support for wind generators might be entered.
Thought antenna vs mast might be a problem but not mast vs tower.
Cheers fly
An antenna is not a mast nor a tower, just as a wind generator is not a
mast nor a tower. They may be
On 19/02/2015 8:55 AM, John Willis wrote:
Btw the playground-type zipwires which I see in nearby parks are around
50 meters, are the 10m types predominant in your place?
Richard
Something so dangerous in the US for children's playgrounds were removed a
long time ago, but in Japan, they
On 27/01/2015 9:29 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
(This discussion originated on talk - crossposted to tagging on
Malcolm's suggestion)
On 26/01/2015 21:16, Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 26/01/2015 19:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Harbour#Quay
On 28/01/2015 3:26 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:
E.g.: a 17-degree mapped mountain road or San Francisco street's will get
its actual length a 5% bonus compared to its real-life counterpart.
True, but such roads are not very common (17 degree ~= 30%). There are
a few short streets in places like San
On 28/01/2015 8:41 PM, Rainer Fügenstein wrote:
Hello Warin,
Wednesday, January 28, 2015, 8:48:16 AM, you wrote:
W Request For Discussion
W http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:substance
thanks for picking up thus topic. I have to leave in a few minutes for
a 6 week assignment, therefore
Request For Discussion
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:substance
Pipe lines currently exist for non drinking water in various part of the
world. And have done for some time. They are becoming more numerous as
efforts to save water and reduce environmental impacts increase.
On 29/01/2015 12:28 AM, althio wrote:
removed:
(features that do not exist anymore or never existed but are commonly seen
on other sources)
I propose to remove the part or never existed but are commonly seen on
other sources, because this has nothing to do with removed. If people want
to tag
On 31/01/2015 1:47 AM, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 30/01/2015 14:12, St Niklaas wrote:
From: François Lacombe fl.infosrese...@gmail.com
Since OSM editing tools aren't AutoCAD you can't be 100% precise on the
geometry.
Exactly so.
Francois if you’re using JOSM you’re be able to work up till
The wiki page for temperature
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:temperature has been empty for
some time.. I've taken the plunge and made some entries .. see what you
think!
Any ideas for improvements will be gratefully recived. Critisium without
a suggestion as to how to improve, less
On 31/01/2015 3:18 PM, David Bannon wrote:
On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 14:55 +1100, Warin wrote:
... I think the following things should be mapped to add information
to the map in regards some, mainly commercial, camp grounds that have
communal kitchens;
Warin, I recently was looking
Hi,
Follow a thread on another forum (non OSM, but talking about side
issues) I think the following things should be mapped to add information
to the map in regards some, mainly commercial, camp grounds that have
communal kitchens;
stove top (no, not a bbq)
microwave_oven
fridge (or
On 26/01/2015 12:44 PM, johnw wrote:
Or does this go back to it should be shop:jewelry=watches or
shop=jewelry + jewelry=watches problem?
Javbw
If so, then lets try to decide on a flat or categorized system that
can handle new additions without a lot of hemming and hawing every
time a new
it but I made a few edits I felt will help
clarify what you are proposing.
Cheers,
AlaskaDave
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
The wiki page for temperature
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:temperature has been
On 1/02/2015 8:31 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
cistern in English implies underground or covered.
You want something like
man_made=water_tank (unfortunately often used as fish?-water tank)
or
man_made=storage
storage=water
On 31 January 2015 at 00:49, S Volk svo...@hotmail.com
On 1/02/2015 7:47 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
There is much that needs to be done to bring OSM up to speed regarding
camping facilities IMO. We have only a very few tags
tourism=camp_site, tourism=caravan_site, and in a stretch,
leisure=summer camp to describe the myriad of facilities out there.
1 - 100 of 2283 matches
Mail list logo
