The onsen icon (♨) is commonly used all over Japan (of course), and is a great
icon (a hot bath with steam rising out) to represent a place to get a hot
natural bath vs a natural park's hot-spring. Onsen always means naturally
sourced hot water as well, vs a bathhouse (amenity=spa? showers?),
by a business, similar
to a lap swimming pool vs a pond, or a fire hydrant vs a spring.
Javbw
On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:13 AM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
The onsen icon (♨) is commonly used all over Japan (of course), and is a
great icon (a hot bath with steam rising out) to represent a place
A rice field is a specialized field hat doesn't change . it is Landuse=farm
crop=rice
An eggplant field has almost the exact same setup, though shorter, and it is
landuse=farm crop=vegetable
the hop garden is visually distinctive, as is an orchard or a vineyard, and
those do have their own
On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:38 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
I know of a number of each type of facility that I won't be adding to
the map
This is for an amenity for a building - like Sauna. not a natural=hot_spring
(which is what you are talking about), so cool your waters.
'Onsen' is in the Oxford Dictionary, defined as 'In Japan: a hot spring, esp.
one thought to have medicinal properties; a hot spring resort'.
well hot diggity-dog. There we go.
Javbw
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Well, to me, landuse=civic it is the land that public owned, public accessed
facilities that not covered by a specific existing landuse (works, water
treatment plant, school, landfill, highways, railways).
In the built environment (not natural), there are some *general* landuses, such
as:
-
...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-10 10:52 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
Well, to me, landuse=civic it is the land that public owned, public accessed
facilities that not covered by a specific existing landuse (works, water
treatment plant, school, landfill, highways, railways).
IMHO we should
IMHO we do indeed have no need for building=public / civic.
if I were back in San Deigo, I might agree with that, but having come to Japan,
there is a definite and immediately recognizable distinction of city buildings,
*and* they are used quite heavily.
There is a known difference and a
+1 for dirt. There is a distinct difference between a dirt and gravel roads, as
well as sand.
In the US, dirt roads - especially fire and forestry roads - are maintained for
private and emergency access. Most of these roads are maintained by grading,
but are not surfaced with gravel in any
To me, Amenity=onsen is similar to amenity=townhall.
for many onsen, there is no particular room you would say is the onsen, just
like no particular room is the townhall, It is the title of the facility
itself.. The purpose of the facility becomes it's name.
There might be some small
On Mar 15, 2014, at 5:05 AM, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, any information you add does help. If you could use something
more specific than dirt (gravel is more precise, for instance)
Not when the road is dirt as opposed to gravel.
I live on a gravel road in
In summary:
- tracktype tag=surface:compaction
- smoothness tag=surface:regularity
- surface tag=surface:material_structure
That is how I understand it. the Smoothness is the most subjective one, but the
others should be pretty straightforward.
Javbw
On Mar 16, 2014, at 1:09 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd consider neither courthouses nor government buildings administration.
Federal buildings in the US are the equivalent to branch offices of the US
government - basically national hall - they are very far apart,
when mixed
together? Or is the definition of townhall already that broad?
Javbw
PS: thanks for putting up with my comments and questions, especially when I am
mistaken.
On Mar 16, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 16/mar/2014 um 02:20 schrieb johnw
On Mar 18, 2014, at 1:35 AM, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Replacing 'stiffness'
with something else is absolutely fine with me.
What about firmness? soundness?
Javbw
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Mar 17, 2014, at 10:49 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-03-16 23:11 GMT+01:00 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
I'd like to clarify what I said before that landuse=civic_admin would be
useful. It would be useful for tagging the only the compounds where
On Mar 21, 2014, at 4:06 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-20 19:24 GMT+01:00 Kytömaa Lauri lauri.kyto...@aalto.fi:
They (civil features) don't exist to produce income (even if they somewhat
do) so the commerce part is missing, but they exist because the society
Hey guys - I had a question about tagging wayside shrines. The wiki posits
that they are Christian, but I want to use them for another religion. This led
me to think about other religion-neutral tags main tags, and using a subtag for
the object.
here in Japan, there are probably tens of
On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse=japanese_temple_grounds, or landuse=buddhist_temple_grounds, or maybe
something nicer.
My Parent's presbyterian Church in San Diego has a very large chapel building,
a religious pre-school kindergarten, a meeting
Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 17/lug/2014 um 09:35 schrieb johnw jo...@mac.com:
My Parent's presbyterian Church in San Diego has a very large chapel
building, a religious pre-school kindergarten, a meeting hall, the church
office building, and a playground
Still not convinced about landuse=religious (could be owner_type=religious).
On Jul 17, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 16/lug/2014 um 23:43 schrieb John Willis jo...@mac.com:
It is all a single place, operated by the monks and priests that live
On Jul 17, 2014, at 5:46 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm surprised about this discussion. Think that
amenity=place_of_worship has to be treated like amenity=school. Nobody
is asking to create a landuse=school because it is rendered properly
on the main osm style
Besides this
On Jul 21, 2014, at 10:06 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am not sure if I completely understand your question. I think the rest
(or whole area) can evventually be split over different landuses, that is not
a problem itself. landuse is not suited (IMHO) to create a
Martin - thanks for the thoughtful reply.
I read it carefully, and I think you kind of misunderstood me again, please
bare with me.
On Jul 24, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-24 1:01 GMT+02:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
My Main question is on my
There's an interesting question.
It is a salt evaporation pond , and it is a really old practice of making
salt. the colorful south bay of san francisco is thanks to salt farming.
But is refining a mineral really farming? Refining is usually considered
industrial - but it was practiced with
@ martin -
In Japan, the neighborhood industrial shops are really common, especially
here in car parts land Gunma (Home of Subaru, Mitsuba and Ogura). We're talking
two guys in a garage running (truly) industrial metal stamping machines to make
simple brackets or whatnot for cars. Tokyo's
On Jul 26, 2014, at 5:59 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
in this field (government agencies/institutions/services) we are lacking
almost all tags, but I would prefer to use something different than landuse
(or subtag for landuse)
We're talking about a very simple
been tagging a while in Japan, and a lot of larger infrastructure things -
roads, motorways, train stations, have english names added in parenthesis, such
as for
Tokyo Station [東京駅] :
name=東京 (Tokyo)
Name:ja=東京
name:en=Tokyo
There are hundreds of things that care labeled that way, I continued
On Sep 13, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
No local mapper wants to read München (Munich) on the map. So why should
Japanese or Chinese mappers want to read something on their map?
- if they were using a Japanese only map, then I can understand, but that would
.
Javbw
On Sep 13, 2014, at 11:41 PM, Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
johnw
Japan local community had discussed about that on 2014/03.
Thread is started here (quite long!)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2013-September/007600.html
Summary is
* Japan
Missed that in August. Great to see it is being discussed at any level.
On Sep 14, 2014, at 12:21 AM, Satoshi IIDA nyamp...@gmail.com wrote:
wow!
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/803
My previous text should be insisted (past, at that time).
I'll follow the
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like the end goal is:
- to have junction names in korea, regardless of if they are traffic lights,
and the symbol used there doesn't imply traffic lights, just a junction.
- In Japan, the old junction system evolved to be named traffic signals, and
the
17.09.2014 00:06, schrieb johnw:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like the end goal is:
- to have junction names in korea, regardless of if they are traffic
lights, and the symbol used there doesn't imply traffic lights, just a
junction.
- In Japan, the old junction system evolved
On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:59 AM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
* Here, I still do not see your point. What would you gain in doing so? You
have more tags, which means more work. But can you do anything that you can
not do with the current, yet existing tagging?
Differentiated tagging
I don't know much about how the rendering system parses the tags. I thought t
would be non-trivial for it to work out how to display signal icons without a
new tag, so I thought a new tag might be necessary, and gave my suggestion.
I'm aware the current system is in use a lot for simple 1
On Sep 20, 2014, at 6:37 AM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
After thinking more about the tag name question: It may be useful to use for
the complex situation at least the same key as for their conterpart in simple
situations. This is intuitive (usability), and at the same time the
So the solution for a complex intersection is to have a signal_area area with
an outline that intersects with all the nodes where the signal would affect the
traffic? This would let the renderer use one icon, and still have the ways
marked in the proper spot for the intersection, right?
On Sep 21, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
As described in the proposal, the area is simply drawn around the
approximative area that is affected by the traffic signals. It encloses
everything, but shares nodes only with the incoming and outgoing highways.
So the
On Sep 22, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
It should be pretty trivial to have the area share nodes with the highway
ways where the signals would normally be mapped.
Like drawing a square around a tic-tac-toe board, but the shared nodes are
only on one side at
Wow, you really went over it very carefully, thanks for all the input. I will
go over your list of issues again, but can you fix it to as how you would see
this tag used? I'm very interested to see how you would properly tag it, as you
know the parsing methods much better than I do ('cause I
Yea, it's a brothel - but it is avery particular style of brothel in Asia to
get around the laws , and AFAIK has very different customs than what I imagine
a more european or australian brothel is. because of the type of service that
is expected, I don't believe it meshes well with what someone
I have a question on highway link roads.
I came across some trunk_links that seemed really out of place today, but they
were recently added by a tagger that usually knows what they are doing.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/36.30046/139.19574
The frontage road for local access to the
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:39 PM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand it, the local access roads would be an unclassified road
with bollards or a kind of barrier at each end, and with trunk links, (or
one way unclassified roads?) that lead onto the actual new trunk road.
Sometimes you have frontage roads who mostly don’t give local access. Example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=39.47925mlon=-0.45146#map=17/39.47925/-0.45146
Here the mapper decided to use “tertiary”. The road has mostly
through-traffic. I would not make a strict rule for all cases, but
If we are going to use landcover=forest/wood/ to unify the meaning of trees on
the ground, then the current implementation of forest - the bright green with
tree markers - should probably use the same color of wood green, as they are
all just a large amount of trees. The forest still uses the
Or make Highway=trunk a little brighter green, so it stands out against the
wood even more.
On Sep 25, 2014, at 8:59 AM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
If we are going to use landcover=forest/wood/ to unify the meaning of trees
on the ground, then the current implementation of forest
a few months ago I laid out the case for landuse=civic It's literal definition
is a little restrictive, but basically all government admin and services. from
a brance office of the city hall to the UN building. local to supranational.
There was so much back and forth over it - do we need a
On Oct 5, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno 04/ott/2014, alle ore 06:58, johnw jo...@mac.com ha scritto:
Usually the government services are monopolistic - courts, police, elected
officials (there's only 1 mayor) tax offices, DMV, etc
On Oct 9, 2014, at 9:18 PM, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
Other possible descriptions would be:
“haulage” for large loads. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haulage
“courier” for smaller items. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courier
Distribution logistics is the *planning* of
Distribution logistics is the *planning* of moving goods from a factory to
the customer - the post office isn't a logistics company. Fedex or UPS, wich
will pick up, store, warehouse, and ship another company's goods as they
request them to be shipped to the customer for them is a
It sounds like the parking is an amenity of the the trailhead. maybe tagging
the trailhead as a point/area is a good thing. (amenity=trailhead or similar
tag that could be for a point or area. This si especially useful for larger
facilities where the whole reason for being is that the the
There are several other uses of the service key, like on waterway=canal +
service=irrigation.
So there must be other tags where the documentation exists for the other uses
of the service tag only with the parent key.
Javbw
On Oct 20, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Jack Burke burke...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't shopping centre a collection of disparate stores grouped together for
connivence (same parking lot), whereas a mall is a singular large (or several
large) buildings full of little shops, primarily accessed by a pedestrian
Thoroughfare in the center?
To me the defining characteristic is
The second is in no way, shape or form, a mall, in the modern usage of Mall'
to define a shopping plaza destination. The word mall can also define a
pedestrian walkway with shops, But the singular noun of Mall - meaning a
large pedestrian centric shopping plaza - is very different than 5 shops
On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:21 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
To me analyzing the given examples it seems as if a mall was
I was going to suggest Waste Transfer station
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_transfer_station
But after reading the wiki for it, it was not at all what I expected.
In America, at least in most suburban areas, waste is collected from individual
residences via bins/cans
is that odd locked box for).
johnw wrote on 2014-10-31 07:00:
I was going to suggest Waste Transfer station
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_transfer_station
But after reading the wiki for it, it was not at all what I expected.
In America, at least in most suburban areas, waste
'.
But
as in amenity={hospital|school}, amenity=embassy can be applied to an area
without hassle.
tom
John Willis wrote on 2014-10-07 23:47:
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 7, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-10-07 14:57 GMT+02:00 johnw :
For example, I'm a foreign resident
AFIK - footway and path are more toward the width, surface, smoothness,
maintenance level, and expected use of the way. a sidewalk often gets tagged as
footpath, as would be a concrete walkway in a garden.
Paths are usually less maintained, less even, narrower, and lower grade
surfaces.
, johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com
wrote:
Civic is what I suggested a few months ago. but where the line is drawn is up
for debate: what is included in this catch-all, and what isn’t.
I’ve tried arguing that each class should have their own catch-all landuse -
eg: we have residential
,
so it would be nice it the other contributors to this discussion would
indicate under which title we should start it.
tom
johnw wrote on 2014-11-04 00:40:
and the line between public and private is not one OSM singles out very
much (is is a public school vs a private school
Went hiking on mt Miyogi yesterday in Gunma, and like other steep mountain
parks, sections of the trail were near vertical or completely vertical sections
of trail that have to be climbed by chains and occasional footholds. the
longest was over 30m. the shortest was about 4m.
Thanks Alberto, Mike Martin for the suggestions. I was a avid hiker in the
US, but this was the first time for me to encounter such assistance devices
myself. never knew their collective name until now.
Dan - I understand about “tagging for the renderer” , but what you personally
consider
To me, Civic is short for Civic Services. Maybe I should make that clear. I
updated the RFC page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/civic
: of or relating to a city or town or the people who live there
: relating to
to me, as long as we get a new landuse and some
subtags out of it.
On Nov 5, 2014, at 9:27 AM, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl
wrote:
On 5 November 2014 00:23, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
Business-government-citizen-military-religion-farm-park. There's some mixing
between them
opposing civil or civic by the definitions you cited above,
[...]
What about using more specific definitions, e.g.
landuse=public_administration?
johnw wrote on 2014-11-04 03:56:
Assembling a draft page. it is my first draft page, so my syntax is kinda
crap.
I will be working
I’m not sure of other countries, but at least in the US, parking on top of
retail structures is exceedingly rare - usually there are adjacent multi-story
parking structures. It always seems that there is some kind of code or cost
savings preventing it, always forcing it to be underground or
I was thinking of just.. Um.. drawing an area of the building, with levels=x,
layer=1, then drawing the parking lot on top of it (it usually is a bit smaller
and less than 100% of the top, elevators and AC and all), and then tagging the
parking with Amenity=parking parking=rooftop / layer=2
.
Javbw
On 11.11.2014 06:38, johnw wrote:
I assume there is a need to create a new parking=rooftop or similar tag,
which can then be used to create more accurate renderers (perhaps by also
placing the parking=rooftop tag onto the service=parking isle service
roads, so
First Principle?
However in a multistory buliding .. what are people coming to the building
for? Should 'we' not map the purpose of the building
The purpose of the building is indeed retail (almost always), but the purpose
of the map is navigation.
I wish to accurately tag and render
level=roof sounds fine to me. Roof always gets special treatment (it’s usually
never a floor number)
On Nov 12, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:22 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
2014-11-11 12:53 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de
, at 8:33 PM, Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com wrote:
What about more complex buildings with multiple roofs?
2014-11-12 12:27 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com:
level=roof sounds fine to me. Roof always gets special treatment (it’s
usually never a floor number
in the late 1980’s, they put non-potable signs on many springs in national
parks because of the uncertainty of bacteria in the water (from horse poop),
though people had been drinking from them since the parks creation (and
earlier).
There are places where access to water via spring or other
If we are to split landuse=civic into civic_services and civic_admin, Then I
would like some feedback on the categories things fall into.
On the discussion page, I listed out some building types that would fall into
either one, and I would like opinions on removals or additions to the lists.
.
This seems to really require a non-binary solution.
On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:16 AM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
Now that the tagging structure can handle roads, driveways, tracks and trails
with very high levels of detail, the effort to refine the tags for even
smaller and more local
A couple more landuse cases were added. I’m going to ask now if it is a good
idea to specifically exclude Police/fire/safety and give them their own
landuse(s).
Safety could cover the lifeguard/ski patrol/ranger buildings that are public or
privately operated for the purposes of interacting
On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:03 AM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
A couple more landuse cases were added. I’m going to ask now if it is a good
idea to specifically exclude Police/fire/safety and give them their own
landuse(s
On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:29 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
it is a subkey for the buildings, to go with building=civic.
My concern is about splitting a landuse polygon just to refine
information that could be stored
Updated and clarified the split of civic into 3 separate keys - civic_admin,
civic_service, and civic_safety. Also discussed judicial and penal.
civic_safety and penal are interesting, because there is no landuse for police
stations, fire stations, jails or prisons. Martin suggested splitting
How would I go about documenting the garbage/refuse cabinets? Just get a
picture and put it into the wiki, or is there some other way?
because it is a brand new proposal, I’m unsure of the procedure to extend it.
Javbw
It has been documented as voted yesterday
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-11-14 5:03 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com:
A couple more landuse cases were added. I’m going to ask now if it is a good
idea to specifically exclude Police/fire/safety and give them
On Nov 17, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
On 17/11/2014 15:14, althio forum wrote:
I may have been stretching the 'Openstreetmap' case a bit.
We were discussing how to properly tag kilns, with their method of firing and
how many chimneys they have, so I
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
there will be more people with even more ideas and classification needs.
Therefor the foo=bar, bar=x way of subtyping, which implies there is only one
kind of subtyping, should generally be deprecated in
Then how did mail relay box sneak through then? It was part of the initial
proposal. It’s a box full of letters/parcels.
Javbw.
On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:33 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-11-18 8:32 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com:
updated
I have a question about creating custom road shields, and I know this ties into
-carto - but I think it needs tags to work, so I’ll start here in the tagging
list.
I was thinking of a method for adding custom badges or shields to roads and
generic objects - usually country specific things,
I think having it on the relation is a great idea, especially since adding the
tags to all the road segments sounds like an insane amount of tagging . Is this
something that we should ask Phil to create a formal proposal page for the
tags, so we can start adding symbol key values to relations?
On Nov 28, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 11/27/14 6:48 PM, johnw wrote:
I think having it on the relation is a great idea, especially since adding
the tags to all the road segments sounds like an insane amount of tagging .
Is this something that we
On Nov 29, 2014, at 4:26 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:11 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com
mailto:jo...@mac.com wrote:
That looks really good. Some graphic designers need to remake the shields for
icon size (bigger lettering, details ignored
Maybe in Japan a convenience store doesn't have food in it.
Japan has the nicest conbinis you can find - you could actually eat a real
(premade) lunch every day from a convenience store here, rather than getting
food poisoning from a hot dog at one in the US.
However - to them Fast food
One of the driving schools I went to is a permanent course laid out on a flood
plain ( as is the soccer fields and helipads), but as it is inside a leveed
flood canal, they are not allowed to build permanent buildings.
So the driving school uses a bus. It has a desk, a waiting room, and
working on a proposal for civic landuses, and a subtag for building=civic for
all kinds of governmental buildings and services.
Your input is appreciated.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic
javbw
On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:30 AM, John F. Eldredge
The best way is probably locals developping a tagging scheme for their
field. The only problem then would be cuisine types that don't exist in the
country of which they pretend to come from ;-)
Yep - I’m sure the traditional, sushi, soba, udon, and maybe even the
imported-from-china ramen
johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com:
working on a proposal for civic landuses, and a subtag for building=civic for
all kinds of governmental buildings and services.
Your input is appreciated.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic
http
. I had no
idea there were so many kinds of pizza in Italy!^__^
Javbw
On Dec 16, 2014, at 9:04 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-12-16 12:36 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com:
Building=Civic + civic=civic_services if it offers something
It’s interesting that wherever you go, the “builder” people all seem to have
their own culture and identity - and uniform. The construction workers in
america that frame houses all seem to be part of of a big club, and the
specialty wooden house people here in Japan - daiku-san (大工さん) , with
usually, the purpose of visiting a playground is to, um, visit the playground.
The purpose of a play area is (AFIK) a place to deposit the kids while (one of)
the adults do something else, or as a amenity to a more serious or boring place
place where the kids can have their attention taken
It's also time perhaps to talk about a trailhead symbol.
+1 being able to tag (then get renderings for) trailheads would be a big plus.
names should also be rendered in a distinct manner as well.
___
Tagging mailing list
perhaps use the =destination tag instead of =private on the road you are
supposed to use.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
I think that unless you are an invited guest and have a drawn map and
permission from the owner, a private
I'm micromapping some public areas, in this case train stations. two questions:
1) there are large open concrete areas for pedestrians, but there are also
covered walkways through them as well.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/36.38380/139.07281
I mapped the open sections as
On Dec 30, 2014, at 4:29 PM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 5:27 AM, johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com
wrote:
I mapped the open sections as highway=pedestrian+area=yes, while I traced the
covered walkways (that connect the bus shelters) and tagged
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo