From the key:surface article:
- surface=paved: "This value gives only a rough description; use a
more precise value if possible."
- surface=paving_stones: "A relatively smooth surface paved with
artificial blocks (block pavers, bricks) or natural stones
(flagstones), with a flat top. The gaps betw
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 23:06, marc marc wrote:
> why it isn't a paving_stones ? the max height ?
>
Shape and size.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brick#Optimal_dimensions,_characteristics,_and_strength
I ask myself how and how many mappers 'll see a diff.
>
Any who have ever laid bricks, or han
why it isn't a paving_stones ? the max height ?
I ask myself how and how many mappers 'll see a diff.
Le 08.01.20 à 22:36, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit :
> Is following picture
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paving_being_laid_arp.jpg
> depicting construction of surface=paving_stones?
>
>
On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 07:15 +0900, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> The picture shows clay bricks being laid as paving for a service
> road, in a herringbone pattern.
>
> Perhaps this should be surface=brick/bricks? Both are used a few
> thousand times.
>
That is definitely block paving, not bricks. Not
The picture shows clay bricks being laid as paving for a service road, in a
herringbone pattern.
Perhaps this should be surface=brick/bricks? Both are used a few thousand
times.
- Joseph Eisenberg
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:37 AM Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> Is following picture
> https://commons.
Is following picture
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paving_being_laid_arp.jpg
depicting construction of surface=paving_stones?
Or is it incorrect to tag in this way and
surface=block_paved, or surface=paved + paving=block
should be considered as preferable?
Posted to look for more feedb
