Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)

2015-06-02 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Jun 3, 2015 8:06 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
 OSM's k=v design is completely a serious and unnecessary flaw. [...] OSM
is 90% argument, 5% dead-end discussions and 5% progress. The whole is not
a marketable product; it's not fit to be rated as 'beta'. Is this a
significant cause of ex-mappers ? It's a flipping brilliant project but
sadly lacking a great leader.

It seems you are deeply unsatisfied with how OSM works. And your broad
assertions such as that OSM is not fit or is 90% argument are
completely unfounded. Sure, OSM is not perfect but I seriously doubt that
the k=v design or some other point you have raised is the culprit.

Feel free to leave and create a separate project. You can even be the
great leader for that new project that you think OSM needs. If your ideas
are indeed better, then your project will succeed and you can then prove
OSM wrong.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)

2015-06-02 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:04 PM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
wrote:

 iD shows oneway=unknown if it's not set. If it's unknown, iD should not
 show oneway at all.
 OSM's k=v design is completely a serious and unnecessary flaw. Similarly
 are 'categories' like man_made', and 'amenity'.
 Why can we not simply stick to hard facts rather guessing what
 categor(ies) an object fits in

 --
 Mike.
 @millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction -
 For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
 via *the area's premier website - *
 *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family,
 property  pets*


Perhaps http://wikimapia.org/ will better match your needs, and offer more
peace for your family, property and pets.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)

2015-06-02 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On 6/3/15, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:

 On Jun 2, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Jun 3, 2015 8:06 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com
 mailto:pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
  OSM's k=v design is completely a serious and unnecessary flaw. [...] OSM
  is 90% argument, 5% dead-end discussions and 5% progress. The whole is
  not a marketable product; it's not fit to be rated as 'beta'. Is this a
  significant cause of ex-mappers ? It's a flipping brilliant project but
  sadly lacking a great leader.

 It seems you are deeply unsatisfied with how OSM works. And your broad
 assertions such as that OSM is not fit or is 90% argument are
 completely unfounded.


 I don’t know; there are a bunch of fairly key and active OSM people who
 unsubscribed from the lists precisely because they felt it was mostly
 circular argument.

Yes, people leave mailing lists because of the endless arguments and
constant bike-shedding. But that does not constitute 90% of OSM. I am
willing to bet that majority if not 90% of OSM activity is of mappers
actually mapping. Mailing list discussions is a really small slice of
the overall OSM activity.

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] OSM is a right mess (was: Craigslist OpenStreetMap Rendering Issue)

2015-06-02 Thread pmailkeey .
On 3 June 2015 at 01:37, Tom MacWright t...@macwright.org wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 Please propose an alternative.


I see an awful lot of good in OSM and I think it's a great project. I've
had it agreed with another about it being such a mess - but the fact it's
such a worthwhile project it's worth battling on with it - even if, sadly,
others have succumbed to the nightmares around every corner. An alternative
would be wrong, it is this that needs fixing and it needs a lot of 'tricky'
effort to see the good from the not so good. It's like one team at both
ends of a thick 'tug of war' rope, not really sure which way to pull for
the best whilst each has in their hand only a mere strand to that rope. I
think everything is overwhelmed yet the whole thing is clearly in its
infancy - with diseases, viruses and god-knows what being thrown at it at
all times from all angles.

The freedom to make up any tags is brilliant while likely being one of the
biggest problems - that not simply throws simple problems but really
complex multi-dimensional ones with 'language' issues for one thing, the
fact OSM is secretly 2 maps (at least!!) in one where in the main the two
are compatible and other places where clearly they're not. Computers
frequently come up with an answer. OSM rarely does; likely many answers or
none at all. Digital, analogue, fuzzy logic all put into a blender and
whizzed for a few seconds - and each time this is tried a different result
is found. Consistently inconsistent.

I think in the end it will work - but the effort required to get there will
be far greater than the sum of its parts.

Take one aspect - quality - there's the whole gamut from true to false -
anyone can't assume anything about OSM data - and if different people
around the world wrote a report on it, none of the resulting reports would
agree !

I can't produce some magic answer without some agreement :)

-- 
Mike.
@millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *

*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property
 pets*

TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging