Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-24 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On 24 July 2018 at 18:49, François Lacombe wrote: > > No because water always flows, look at the left picture on the danger sign. > Sorry, couldn't see the water - just looked like a dry gully It's just that sometimes, hydroelectric operator releases big amount of > water wich completely and

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging: hazard?

2018-07-24 Thread Yves
The tag 'hazard' can be found on the whitewater wiki page, so I guess whatever tag is found here would be worth mentioned there. Yves Le 24 juillet 2018 12:51:39 GMT+02:00, ael a écrit : >On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:48:05PM +0200, François Lacombe wrote: >> >> As the discussion about

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging: hazard?

2018-07-24 Thread ael
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:48:05PM +0200, François Lacombe wrote: > > As the discussion about intermittent/seasonal/... on waterways goes on, > there is another thing to map: how waterways banks can be dangerous due to > sudden rise or lower water level. The obvious tag is hazard, but for some

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-24 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Dave, I agree about monsooon or snow melt. Regarding industrial operations involving downstream rivers, there are precise restrictions and perimeters may be publicly displayed like this https://imgur.com/a/TLhZcgE Regarding this particular place : The stream

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-24 Thread Dave F
Hi This is another one of those discussion which comes up every year or so. The perception of danger is subjective; which never fits well within OSM. Waterways are not dangerous in themselves. They are inanimate objects. They don't jump out & attack you as you walk by. It's the naive way

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-24 Thread François Lacombe
Hi Graeme, 2018-07-24 0:12 GMT+02:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick : > > On 24 July 2018 at 06:48, François Lacombe > wrote: > >> >> Then what could be the best way to tag it? >> No existing tag sounds suitable for this, even the idea of a single >> "permanence" key. >> > > I think intermittent would

Re: [Tagging] Dangerous waterways tagging

2018-07-23 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On 24 July 2018 at 06:48, François Lacombe wrote: > > Then what could be the best way to tag it? > No existing tag sounds suitable for this, even the idea of a single > "permanence" key. > I think intermittent would still be correct, because the water is only sometimes there? Saw reference to