Re: [Tagging] Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

2016-07-28 10:29 GMT+02:00 Michael Reichert : > railway=disused is a very old and established tag. actually, the very old and formerly established way was railway=*, disused=yes railway=disused is not so old, is quite established and often complemented by disused=*

Re: [Tagging] Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

Hello, adding railway=disused additionally to disused:railway=* ensures backward compatibility, so that renderers which do not consider lifecycle prefixes still produce good results. It might also be easier for some renderers just to look at the value of railway=* than using rendering rules like

Re: [Tagging] Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Am 28.07.2016 um 09:31 schrieb Warin: > My understanding is; > > The primary tag is railway=disused. > > Then you have a 'sub tag' to describe what is disused .. a railway > station, light rail line etc. railway=disused is a very old and

Re: [Tagging] Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

sent from a phone > Il giorno 28 lug 2016, alle ore 09:31, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > The primary tag is railway=disused. > > Then you have a 'sub tag' to describe what is disused .. a railway station, > light rail line etc. IMHO this is an old scheme, nowadays you

Re: [Tagging] Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

On 7/28/2016 4:54 PM, David Marchal wrote: Hello, there. I've been told in a JOSM ticket (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/12866#comment:2) that the wiki states that disused:railway=* requires railway=disused, and, indeed, the wiki says that

Re: [Tagging] Does disused:railway=* require railway=disused?

sent from a phone > Il giorno 28 lug 2016, alle ore 08:54, David Marchal ha > scritto: > > the wiki states that disused:railway=* requires railway=disused doesn't make sense to me cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list