Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 15:25, Volker Schmidt wrote: > Thanks for the pointer, but It does not help. I'm an iD occasional basic > user only. > Ah. I thought one of your main gripes was the iD was warning you about stuff you weren't editing. I am talking about the behaviour of JOSM. > I'm in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

Thanks for the pointer, but It does not help. I'm an iD occasional basic user only. I am talking about the behaviour of JOSM. Maybe I am also JOSM ignorant regarding its functionalities. Virus-free.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 09:02, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > That we will have to live with two tags, or more, for the same thing is > nothing new, what I don't like is to be pestered continuously to do things > to objects that happen to be in my downloaded area, and which I had no > intention even

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

2020-12-21, pr, 11:02 Volker Schmidt rašė: > Mass deprecations are counter-productive in general and independently of > whether they the new tagging is better in some way.. +1 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

Yep. I know that. But for the tag to be on the deprecated tag list, it has to be deprecated in the wiki, I presume at least. That is my point. I don't think that JOSM will flag it deprecated because ID deprecated it, while the wiki still has it as a valid tag. That we will have to live with two

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

Thanks, Brian, for taking the lead on this. I generally agree with the overall direction of the proposal. There's a lot of details on the proposal page but I guess we can discuss them on the wiki talk page. On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:58 PM Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: > A proposal[1] to clarify

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

2020-12-21, pr, 01:10 Clifford Snow rašė: > Please refrain from calling out others as outlined in the Etiquette > Guidelines [1] Can you be more specific? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

Tomas, Please refrain from calling out others as outlined in the Etiquette Guidelines [1] [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Etiquette Best, Clifford On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 12:38 PM Tomas Straupis wrote: > 2020-12-20, sk, 17:59 Paul Allen rašė: > > Too late, at least for iD. Its

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

2020-12-20, sk, 17:59 Paul Allen rašė: > Too late, at least for iD. Its authors have already decided to deprecate > landuse=reservoir. All this proposal does is document the fact. Strange sequence/logic tho: 1. iD brakes the rules, does something contrary to what OpenStreetMap/mappers do,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 15:29, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > > > In addition, please consider that deprecated features are being flagged by > editor sw on > saving any changeet that contains an deprecated tag, even if it has nothing > to do > with your actual editing, this would be adding another

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reservoirs, lakes, and ponds

383 813 *landuse* *reservoir* 334 450 *water* *reservoir* I think it does make no